Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 02/15/2003 4:51:52 PM PST by Pokey78
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Pokey78
Wow! This is an awesome speech!
2 posted on 02/15/2003 4:58:11 PM PST by Tennessean4Bush
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pokey78
This man's leadership impresses me more each day.
3 posted on 02/15/2003 4:58:58 PM PST by Lando Lincoln (God Bless the arsenal of liberty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pokey78
Al-Qaeda attacked the US, not the other way round. Were the people of Bali in the forefront of the anti-terror campaign? Did Indonesia 'make itself a target'? The terrorists won't be nice to us if we're nice to them. When Saddam drew us into the Gulf war, he was not provoked. He invaded Kuwait.

That's right. We never wanted to be in the war of terrorism. But we are drawn into it, and we must finish the job. That means eliminating dictators like Saddam Huessin.

4 posted on 02/15/2003 5:00:49 PM PST by MinorityRepublican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pokey78
Bump.
5 posted on 02/15/2003 5:03:45 PM PST by Rocko
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pokey78
ALERT...

JOY JUNCTION.org: "ARE BRITISH MUSLIMS PLANNING SURPRISE TERROR ATTACK IN THE UK?" by Jeremy Reynalds (February 15, 2003)
http://www.joyjunction.org/bulletin/showarticle.php?threadid=329&postid=352
###

COMPUTER WORLD:
UPDATE: OMAR BAKRI: MUHAMMAD: BIN LADEN'S MAN IN LONDON" by Dan Verton
(November 18, 2002)
http://www.idg.net/english/crd_bakri_965289.html

###
WWW.MEMRI.DE: "RADICAL ISLAMIST PROFILES: SHEIK OMAR BAKRI MUHAMMAD IN LONDON" by Yotam Feldner (December 24, 2001)
http://216.239.37.100/search?q=cache:_UOyqYdvgsEC:www.memri.de/uebersetzungen_analysen/themen/islamistische_ideologie/isl_bakri_24_10_01.pdf+%22Omar+Bakri+Muhammad%22&hl=en&ie=UTF-8
6 posted on 02/15/2003 5:09:46 PM PST by Cindy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pokey78
[So if the result of peace is Saddam staying in power, not disarmed, then I tell you there are consequences paid in blood for that decision too. But these victims will never be seen, never feature on our TV screens or inspire millions to take to the streets. But they will exist none the less.]

This is the sad reality not acknowledged by most "war protestors".
7 posted on 02/15/2003 5:13:52 PM PST by Diddley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pokey78
"If there are 500,000 on the [Stop the War] march, that is still less than the number of people whose deaths Saddam has been responsible for. If there are one million, that is still less than the number of people who died in the wars he started."

Powerful stuff; worth repeating.

10 posted on 02/15/2003 5:22:37 PM PST by Right_in_Virginia (May God bless President Bush and our troops)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pokey78
The need to disarm Iraq seems to me to be a 'no-brainer.' Maybe that's what the problem is with the French, Germans, and hans Blix?
12 posted on 02/15/2003 5:32:44 PM PST by eeriegeno
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pokey78
"The terrorists won't be nice to us if we're nice to them."

This is the whole matter distilled down to its essence. They will not be nice to us because we carry signs and sing folk songs. They will loathe that weakness even more.

AR

13 posted on 02/15/2003 6:22:16 PM PST by arkady_renko
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pokey78
Thanks for posting this Pokey. Very powerful words. I'm just amazed that the opposition can't see it. Or, is it that they don't want to see it?

15 posted on 02/15/2003 6:48:38 PM PST by baseballmom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pokey78
Excellent ! Thanks for the post !

This bears repeating. Not too unlike Churchill's speech of yesteryear?

But there are also consequences of 'stop the war'. There will be no march for the victims of Saddam, no protests about the thousands of children that die needlessly every year under his rule, no righteous anger over the torture chambers which if he is left in power, will remain in being.

I rejoice that we live in a country where peaceful protest is a natural part of our democratic process. But I ask the marchers to understand this.

I do not seek unpopularity as a badge of honour. But sometimes it is the price of leadership and the cost of conviction.

If there are 500,000 on the [Stop the War] march, that is still less than the number of people whose deaths Saddam has been responsible for. If there are one million, that is still less than the number of people who died in the wars he started.

So if the result of peace is Saddam staying in power, not disarmed, then I tell you there are consequences paid in blood for that decision too. But these victims will never be seen, never feature on our TV screens or inspire millions to take to the streets. But they will exist none the less.


17 posted on 02/16/2003 3:25:51 AM PST by MeekOneGOP (Bu-bye SADdam. You're soon to meet your buddy Stalin in Hades.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

bump
19 posted on 02/19/2003 2:05:13 PM PST by GretchenEE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson