I am stating DNA is a set of instructions you claim DNA is a processor. I have not changed my claim as a template is a set of instructions, it is not a processing mechanism. YOu are now claiming you said the "DNA system" rather than DNA... how quaint that you are changing what you claim. There is no "DNA system" there is the CELL that is not a DNA system as DNA is simply one part of the whole. I think you can go back and look at my previous posts where I said you cannot take DNA as a single part but as the whole system. You then insulted me and said I didn't understand DNA. Now you claim you were talking about this system... what a joke. I stated in post 423 that we are discussing DNA not the whole system. I quote myself "look at DNA as its own structure not as a part of the whole". You now change what you claim to be talking about when you are proven wrong.
You do not know how DNA functions you prove it everytime you post. I wrote a very clear statement of why DNA is not a processor it is merely a template and I have stated DNA is a template in every post that I have made. Are you intentionally twisting my words?
Of course you are twisting my words and you also take every chance to insult me. Both tactics are major flaws in your debating style. If you wish to debate the processing power of the Cellular system I am all for it, but you will have to back down from your claim that DNA processes anything. You have been proven wrong and all anyone has to do to see you are wrong about DNA is open a textbook on the subject.
Just to make this clear to everyone I quote Southack from post # 425 where he stated "DNA actually PROCESSES the Base 2/Base 4 instruction sets that are represented in its mathematically represented sequences of nucleotides."
He claims he is talking about the "DNA system" now at the time he said only DNA and stated it was only DNA even after I in post # 423 said that we must discuss DNA as a single part not the whole system. He obviously knew we were talking about DNA by itself not the system.
He has twisted my words and I think everyone should be aware that a person that needs to do this is not a fair witness for his side of the debate.
"If you wish to debate the processing power of the Cellular system I am all for it, but you will have to back down from your claim that DNA processes anything. You have been proven wrong and all anyone has to do to see you are wrong about DNA is open a textbook on the subject." 
First, I honestly encourage you to open such a text book on the subject. It won't hurt you, honest!
Second, I'm MORE THAN HAPPY to change my nomenclature if mere semantics will sway you. If you will agree that the Cellular system processes instructions and data, then I'll be happy to say "Cellular system" instead of "DNA system."
Third, I have no problem "backing down". This debate isn't about me. No, this debate is about science.
What I am forcing people on this thread to admit is that our cellular system processes Base 2/Base 4 mathematical commands and data. This is a key point toward understanding the difference between 19th century theories (e.g. Evolution) from that of 21st century science.
The cellular system is not a blind "template" like a crystal. No, the cellular system is a mathematical instruction-processing system.
Finally, as best that I can tell you seem to be speaking English as a 2nd language. What is your native tongue?
This is probably why you feel your words are being twisted. At least, that's my best guess.