"If you wish to debate the processing power of the Cellular system I am all for it, but you will have to back down from your claim that DNA processes anything. You have been proven wrong and all anyone has to do to see you are wrong about DNA is open a textbook on the subject." 
First, I honestly encourage you to open such a text book on the subject. It won't hurt you, honest!
Second, I'm MORE THAN HAPPY to change my nomenclature if mere semantics will sway you. If you will agree that the Cellular system processes instructions and data, then I'll be happy to say "Cellular system" instead of "DNA system."
Third, I have no problem "backing down". This debate isn't about me. No, this debate is about science.
What I am forcing people on this thread to admit is that our cellular system processes Base 2/Base 4 mathematical commands and data. This is a key point toward understanding the difference between 19th century theories (e.g. Evolution) from that of 21st century science.
The cellular system is not a blind "template" like a crystal. No, the cellular system is a mathematical instruction-processing system.
Finally, as best that I can tell you seem to be speaking English as a 2nd language. What is your native tongue?
This is probably why you feel your words are being twisted. At least, that's my best guess.
Quote from Southack "Finally, as best that I can tell you seem to be speaking English as a 2nd language. What is your native tongue?
This is probably why you feel your words are being twisted. At least, that's my best guess. "
More mindless insults. Hmm does it make you feel good that you had to back out on your claim of DNA's processing power. Does it make you feel intelligent that this non-english speaker, ignorant, foolish and what ever other insults you threw at me made you back down from your claim that DNA processes information. You called me a fool but who looks like one now.
What I am forcing people on this thread to admit is that our cellular system processes Base 2/Base 4 mathematical commands and data. This is a key point toward understanding the difference between 19th century theories (e.g. Evolution) from that of 21st century science When an E. coli goes through 10 cycles of division, all that results is you have 1024 identical copies of the same E. coli. In what sense is information processed, rather than simply duplicated?