Your funny just because your trying to prove that God exists I'm wrong for unmasking your deception . My goodness what a ego you guys have. You imply there is a creator therefore you are trying to prove his existence and you claim that DNA is the proof. My goodness you creationists are adept at double speak did you take your lessons from the Clinton's. I also have every right to attack you as your trying to "fool" people on this board into believing your something your not.
Of course you are no longer trying to defend your proof as I have unmasked it for the logical fallacy that it is. The shame is you'll just move on to some other thread and try to pull off this deception on some other poor souls.
"Of course you are no longer trying to defend your proof as I have unmasked it for the logical fallacy that it is. The shame is you'll just move on to some other thread and try to pull off this deception on some other poor souls." 
No, I simply asked that YOU show where I made such a claim of your so-called "proof".
And so far, you haven't managed to show where I ever said it or made it.
But that little fact hasn't stopped you from knocking down said strawman as if I really had said it.
So come on Sentis, put up or shut up, in WHICH specific post on this thread did I say that it was incontravertibly proven that God exists?
Surely such a fact will be easy for a mind as scientific as yours to produce, right?! I mean, you won't have to babble-on, try to change the subject, or flee this thread, right? You'll just be able to say "Post # so and so" by Southack made that claim, right?!
I mean, you wouldn't be lying about that claim, would you? I mean, your own argument wouldn't be so flimsy as to have been based upon a false premise, right?!
So come on little Sentis, which specific post # will you cite as "proof" rather than opinion?