"Of course you are no longer trying to defend your proof as I have unmasked it for the logical fallacy that it is. The shame is you'll just move on to some other thread and try to pull off this deception on some other poor souls." 
No, I simply asked that YOU show where I made such a claim of your so-called "proof".
And so far, you haven't managed to show where I ever said it or made it.
But that little fact hasn't stopped you from knocking down said strawman as if I really had said it.
So come on Sentis, put up or shut up, in WHICH specific post on this thread did I say that it was incontravertibly proven that God exists?
Surely such a fact will be easy for a mind as scientific as yours to produce, right?! I mean, you won't have to babble-on, try to change the subject, or flee this thread, right? You'll just be able to say "Post # so and so" by Southack made that claim, right?!
I mean, you wouldn't be lying about that claim, would you? I mean, your own argument wouldn't be so flimsy as to have been based upon a false premise, right?!
So come on little Sentis, which specific post # will you cite as "proof" rather than opinion?
As you have misquoted me several times i will restate what I said.
I said and I quote "I don't see how your argument proves the existence of God"
Your posts clearly presupposes that there is a god and I quote you "That's just gibberish. Base 4 math is an order of magnitude of complexity GREATER than Base 2 (i.e. Binary) math. Yet show me where Binary programs form without Intelligent Intervention and THEN we'll be able to discuss whether the vastly more complex Base-4 instructions in DNA could even potentially be formed without Intelligent Intervention.
But the burden of proof is on you. Where is that mystical non-intelligence-formed Base-2 software program?!
After all, I can show PLENTY of examples of such software that has been made WITH intelligent intervention (so I've done my burden of proof - that leaves you out in the cold again)..."
Here is one of several places where you imply that God exists because you can see no evidence which suggests he doesn't.
You have twisted my words and used what is at best Double speak because I never stated what you accuse me of stating. These supposes that you are lying about what I stated in my post and as I quote what i said everyone reading this knows you are twisting my words.