Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 02/14/2003 9:20:29 PM PST by Indy Pendance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Indy Pendance
Well, this is interesting.
2 posted on 02/14/2003 9:22:43 PM PST by Jean S
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Indy Pendance
Last year the Conference was not able to reach agreement on a program of work -- the fourth consecutive year during which it was unable to do so -- and so was unable to start work on substantive issues.

4 Years they haven't done squat???

4 posted on 02/14/2003 9:24:10 PM PST by Mo1 (I HATE The Party of Clinton!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Indy Pendance
[UNITED NATIONS, Feb. 14 (UPI) -- A U.N. spokesman Friday night said, without explanation, that Iraq has relinquished its four-week turn as president of the Geneva-based Conference on Disarmament, making way for Ireland to take up the slack.] Well dang. Don't they have a sense of humor? I was looking forward to many "Animal Farm" moments over the next four weeks. Like putting Joseph Mengele in charge of the Council of Humanitarian Affairs, or Castro in charge of the Council on Economic Development. Let the UN commit suicide in our time. LOLOLOL.
6 posted on 02/14/2003 9:26:32 PM PST by Mad_Tom_Rackham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Indy Pendance
"Iraq relinquishes disarm panel chair"

They know they will be on the run by then

8 posted on 02/14/2003 9:27:46 PM PST by Hannibal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Indy Pendance; Miss Marple; Dog; Howlin; MJY1288; rintense; Brad's Gramma; ABG(anybody but Gore); ..
How interesting!
10 posted on 02/14/2003 9:35:08 PM PST by kayak (God bless President Bush, God bless our military, and God bless America!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Indy Pendance
The Iraqi Mission to the United Nations informed the Secretary-General today that the Iraqi government had sent a letter to the Conference on Disarmament in Geneva saying that they would not be assuming the rotating presidency of the Conference, which they were scheduled to assume on March 17

That's because you're be assuming room temperature by then.

12 posted on 02/14/2003 9:43:19 PM PST by Liberal Bob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Indy Pendance
While there was agreement on most of the elements of a program, the main differences remained on the matter of prevention of an arms race in outer space

They're worried about arms in outer space while not the least bit concerned with the massive proliferation of illegal arms right here on earth. The UN has got to be the biggest joke in the world.

13 posted on 02/14/2003 9:45:23 PM PST by McGavin999
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Indy Pendance
if the UN had found some backbone and not allowed Iraq and Iran not chair these committees - and had not let Libya chair the Human Rights committee, then I *might* say there was some hope for this international clown convention. I don't believe that is the case, though.
16 posted on 02/14/2003 9:48:14 PM PST by Pinch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Indy Pendance
Iran, Iraq, Ireland. They pick who's in charge by alphabetical order?! Sounds kinda grade schoolish.
20 posted on 02/14/2003 10:08:14 PM PST by Boiler Plate
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Indy Pendance
Following in the presidential rotation were to be, in English alphabetical order, Indonesia, the Islamic Republic of Iran, Iraq, Ireland, and Israel.

I am amazed that they were actually able to agree to rotate in "English alphabetical order" - Probably after years of debate.
22 posted on 02/14/2003 10:37:33 PM PST by LayoutGuru2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Indy Pendance
The UN had received so much negative publicity on Iran chairing the Disarmament Conference, that they probably asked their cash cow Iran to back down.

This Disarmament Conference is typical of what the UN does.

They go to an expensive place like Geneva and spend a small fortune on holding the meeting.

Then, we find out that for 4 years they have done nothing at this conference.

Of course we know that the UN has done nothing for over 50 years re disarming the bad guys who are members of the UN. The rich cash cows like Iraq and Iran have armed themselves with whatever they can buy in the open. Then the UN does nothing just like their latest fiasco this week with Iraq.
27 posted on 02/15/2003 4:07:18 AM PST by Grampa Dave (Stamp out Freepathons! Stop being a Freep Loader! Become a monthly donor!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Indy Pendance
BUMP
28 posted on 02/15/2003 5:08:08 AM PST by RippleFire (Hold mein bier!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Indy Pendance
"Last year the Conference was not able to reach agreement on a program of work -- the fourth consecutive year during which it was unable to do so -- and so was unable to start work on substantive issues."

FOUR YEARS?? WANNA BET THE MEMBERS STILL GOT PAID BY OUR TAX DOLLARS TO DO NOTHING??? Proof positive that the U.N. is an irrelevant debating society.

29 posted on 02/15/2003 7:36:14 AM PST by cake_crumb (Without dictators, what reason would we have to keep the UN?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Indy Pendance
Yes. I expected this. The French got them to do it to avoid the embarassing irony of Iraq effectively chairing their own disarmament. The French are also behind Saddam's ban on WMD and probably Asiz's little trip to hide behind the pope's skirts. Damn frogs. They have no shame.
30 posted on 02/15/2003 9:56:23 AM PST by George W. Bush
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson