Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

N Korean military says it would nuke US in self-defense
Taipei Times ^ | 2/14/03

Posted on 02/14/2003 1:02:51 PM PST by pabianice

North Korea yesterday warned it could strike US targets anywhere in the world as pressure mounted for it to scrap its nuclear weapons drive after the UN's atomic watchdog referred the crisis to the Security Council.

"In case there is a self-defensive measure, the attack can be taken to all military personnel and all military commands of the United States in the world," senior foreign ministry official Ri Kwang-hyok said in an interview in the North Korean capital.

"Wherever they are we can attack them.

"There's no limit to our attack ability. The strike force of the Korean People's Army will take on the enemy wherever he is," he said.

Asked if that meant North Korea had missiles capable of reaching Washington, the official replied: "I'm not an expert so I am not sure but we have long-range missiles and our people have the ability of striking enemies far away."

Defense analysts say North Korea has long-range Taepodong-2 missiles which could be capable of reaching parts of the continental US.

On Wednesday, CIA Director George Tenet said the North could already have the capacity to target the US West Coast with a nuclear-capable missile.

Ri also warned that other countries surrounding the Korean Peninsula would inevitably be drawn into any war there.

Pyongyang's provocative comments followed the referral of North Korea to the Security Council by the UN's International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) for breaches of non-proliferation accords.

Ri responded by saying that if North Korea was to be investigated by the UN then Washington should be as well.

"The US is threatening our country with nuclear weapons so this must also be discussed in the Security Council," he said. "We insist that the responsibility of the US must be discussed too."

The vote by the 35-member IAEA board is a major setback to the Stalinist regime, which has been holding out for direct talks with the US and rejecting moves to internationalize the crisis.

Russia, with close diplomatic ties and keen economic interests in North Korea, is also championing direct talks, calling the vote to take it to the Security Council, from which it abstained, "premature."

China, Pyongyang's only other ally, has also insisted that the matter be resolved between the US and North Korea, cautioning that pressure and sanctions "may exacerbate the confrontation and further complicate the issue."

Washington insists the matter is of global concern and has refused negotiations with Pyongyang, saying it must first dismantle its nuclear programs before talks can take place.

South Korea's foreign ministry said Pyongyang now has a "window of opportunity" to resolve the standoff, warning that the UN Security Council would not tolerate defiance.

Japan meanwhile, alarmed by reports that North Korea could set in motion a production line of nuclear bombs within months, urged Pyongyang to respond immediately by dropping its nuclear schemes.

Ri said that while Pyongyang hoped the UN would play fair, it remained wary of the US.

"The US may have influence in the UN Security Council. It is one of the US maneuvers ... they are playing tricks," he said.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; Government
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-31 next last

1 posted on 02/14/2003 1:02:51 PM PST by pabianice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: pabianice
Nuke them first and hard.
2 posted on 02/14/2003 1:07:06 PM PST by boomop1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: boomop1
Ha
3 posted on 02/14/2003 1:10:47 PM PST by Conspiracy Guy (RW&B)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: boomop1
Seconded .... this is getting ridiculous.

Rational people do not threaten to nuke each other repeatedly.

4 posted on 02/14/2003 1:11:08 PM PST by Centurion2000 (Chance favors the prepared mind.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: pabianice
And how will all this Bravo Sierra talk feed their people? Maybe it will just keep their minds off their stomachs.
5 posted on 02/14/2003 1:11:16 PM PST by Bringbackthedraft
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pabianice
Ri responded by saying that if North Korea was to be investigated by the UN then Washington should be as well.

Slap leather, cowboy.

6 posted on 02/14/2003 1:14:53 PM PST by RightWhale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: boomop1
South Korea's foreign ministry said Pyongyang now has a "window of opportunity" to resolve the standoff, warning that the UN Security Council would not tolerate defiance.

After what I watched and heard from the UN today, somehow this statement rings a bit hollow.

Is it any wonder that N. Korea has thrown the UN IAEA inspection process out of the country?

7 posted on 02/14/2003 1:16:57 PM PST by Jambe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: pabianice
"There's no limit to our attack ability. The strike force of the Korean People's Army will take on the enemy wherever he is," he said.

Yea, whatever.

8 posted on 02/14/2003 1:19:17 PM PST by DoctorMichael (Tag THIS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Centurion2000
One word for Kim,Thermo.
9 posted on 02/14/2003 1:22:34 PM PST by oyez (Is this a great country...........Or what?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: pabianice
"There's no limit to our attack ability. The strike force of the Korean People's Army will take on the enemy wherever he is," he said.

Except that after launching two of your missiles (whose capabilities are still in doubt), your nuclear arsenal is depleted, and your capital becomes a wasteland. Yeah, real scary.

North Korea's leaders are just being opportunistic in the timing of their thumb nosing. If we weren't so occupied in so many other areas of the world, none of this would be going on. They're like the dumbass oaf who pulls stunts while the teacher is out of the room...

That being said, the prospects of conventional warfare in the region are much more realistic, and ironically, more horrific to contemplate.

10 posted on 02/14/2003 1:23:38 PM PST by D. Brian Carter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pabianice
Hopefully will take care of Dear Leader and his crybabies as soon as we take care of Iraq.

This a clear blatant threat to the United States of America.
11 posted on 02/14/2003 1:30:02 PM PST by RecentConvert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pabianice
Does anyone have an address for Ri Kwang-hyok? I'm thinking I might send him a pair of cheap sunglasses. He's gonna need 'em.
12 posted on 02/14/2003 1:30:05 PM PST by shadowman99
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pabianice
Pyongyang's provocative comments followed the referral of North Korea to the Security Council by the UN's International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) for breaches of non-proliferation accords.

Dear Leader must be having temper tantrums for not being allowed direct negotiations with the United Sates.

13 posted on 02/14/2003 1:33:12 PM PST by RecentConvert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pabianice
The North Koreans threaten U.S. personnel with fiery nuclear death...and the response is a giant, collective yawn.

Kim's gotta be wondering where he went wrong...

14 posted on 02/14/2003 1:33:24 PM PST by Billthedrill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pabianice
This is an interesting variant of "suicide by cop"....
15 posted on 02/14/2003 1:34:11 PM PST by tracer (/b>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pabianice
Antbody want to bet which Hollyweirdo leaves first or which one builds the first bomb shelter
16 posted on 02/14/2003 1:34:20 PM PST by uncbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pabianice
The good news is they would target blue states.
17 posted on 02/14/2003 1:34:45 PM PST by Paleo Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pabianice
I think the rub will be in defining "self-defense". /sarcasm
18 posted on 02/14/2003 1:34:47 PM PST by Let's Roll (Whether we bring our enemies to justice, or bring justice to our enemies, justice will be done.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RecentConvert; Alamo-Girl; belmont_mark
And also it takes care of all those DemocRATS (allies of the Axis of Weasels) who were loudly complaining about the total non-necessity, and 'irrelevance', of deploying an National Missile Defense. We're in a 'War on Terror', after all, not a nuclear war.... Oops. Dear Leader has really upset their little apple cart. Wonder how long before Hitlery! is claiming that GWB has been negligent in getting a Missile Shield up....
19 posted on 02/14/2003 1:45:59 PM PST by Paul Ross (From the State Looking Forward to Global Warming! Let's Drown France!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: pabianice
So, let me get this right....we get rid of Pyong-Yang and DC at one time??? .... Hmmmm....that's a tempting offer Mr. Kim, can I get back to ya on that tommorrow?
20 posted on 02/14/2003 2:03:17 PM PST by The Duke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-31 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson