Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Stuck with Sharpton: Why the Democrats can't shake a race-hustling demagogue
FrontPageMagazine.com ^ | Friday, February 14, 2003 | By Robert Novak

Posted on 02/13/2003 11:51:44 PM PST by JohnHuang2

Stuck with Sharpton
By Robert Novak
Townhall.com | February 14, 2003


Ever since Democrats gathered in Washington Jan. 21 to celebrate the 30th anniversary of legalized abortion, the party's deep thinkers have been brooding. The Rev. Al Sharpton, who preached before he could read or write, made five white opponents for the presidential nomination look prosaic. In the three weeks since, more prominent Democrats have come to regard the 48-year-old Pentecostal minister from Harlem as their worst nightmare.

How could the world's oldest political party be threatened by a professional troublemaker accused of not paying his taxes and found guilty of defaming innocent public officials? The answer is found in two independent polls. Zogby shows Sharpton with 20 percent of the African-American vote for president, and InsiderAdvantage gives him 28 percent. These startling numbers come in advance of Sharpton's campaign to extend his presence beyond the boundaries of New York City.

This is a problem waiting to happen for the Democratic Party thanks to reliance on black voters, particularly in the South. Democrats dodged the bullet when the Rev. Jesse Jackson ran for president (and succeeded in ruining young Al Gore's 1988 bid aimed at sweeping Southern primaries). This reliance is much stronger 15 years later, and a black candidate promises to distort an already confused contest for the nomination.

An expected African-American vote of 40 percent gives Sharpton an edge in South Carolina's crucial early primary. While he will not be nominated, he poses an omnipresent embarrassment at multi-candidate debates and will demand a major speaking slot at the national convention in Boston. So, the party is stuck with Sharpton.

Until the Roe v. Wade celebration, many prominent Democrats were in denial about Sharpton. They dismissed a discredited rabble-rouser who never has been elected to public office. A warning came from New York City, where Sharpton has killed Democratic chances in the last two mayoral elections, by his own candidacy in 1997 and by refusing to endorse the party's nominee in 2001. Democratic political operative Howard Wolfson, a veteran of the New York wars, said of the other presidential candidates: "These guys have no idea what they're in for."

The NARAL Pro-Choice America dinner Jan. 21 was an eye opener. All six declared presidential hopefuls delivered dutiful but uninspired affirmations (with Sen. Joe Lieberman, treasuring his social conservative credentials, enshrining abortion as an American tradition). Sharpton stirred the audience by declaring: "It is time for the Christian Right to meet the right Christian."

Who will cut down Sharpton and expose his flaws? Not major Democratic players, and certainly not the other presidential candidates. Former Sen. Carol Moseley-Braun, defeated for re-election from Illinois in 1998 after a scandal-scarred single term, was suggested as a second black presidential candidate. It was too transparent a ploy to dilute Sharpton's vote to succeed.

While big-gun Democrats stay silent, the party's advocates mount a barrage against Sharpton. The February cover story of the left-wing American Prospect magazine, "Al 'The Rev.' Sharpton vs. The Democrats," excoriates his public record. The same accusations were made to Sharpton's face on CNN's "Crossfire" by former Clinton presidential aide Paul Begala. Normally, the American Prospect and Begala reserve their attacks for George W. Bush and members of his administration.

However, Sharpton is tougher than usual Republican targets. Whenever Begala interrupted him, Sharpton interrupted back. When Begala demanded a "yes or no" answer to whether he would support any Democratic presidential nominee, Sharpton responded: "I'm going to answer it my way. You know, you all have to get used to (it). You all can't give orders no more, Paul. There are grown up folk in this party now, and we're going to answer the questions the way we believe."

Sharpton's rivals for the Democratic nomination dread such a riposte. Nor do they relish being the brunt of the Reverend's counterattacks. When asked by a reporter about his role in the Tawana Brawley non-rape case, he replied: "The next time anybody wants to know about Tawana Brawley, I'm going to ask them: 'Do you ask Teddy Kennedy about Chappaquiddick? Do you ask Hillary Clinton about her husband?'" If the Democrats don't dare risk abuse by challenging an African-American candidate, the alternative is enduring the Sharpton nightmare.



TOPICS: Editorial; News/Current Events; US: New York; US: South Carolina
KEYWORDS: democrats; sharpton
Friday, February 14, 2003

Quote of the Day by Mr. Bird

1 posted on 02/13/2003 11:51:44 PM PST by JohnHuang2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
"The next time anybody wants to know about Tawana Brawley, I'm going to ask them: 'Do you ask Teddy Kennedy about Chappaquiddick? Do you ask Hillary Clinton about her husband?'"

If I were voting in the Democratic primary (now there's an idea), Sharpton would get my vote!

Go Al! But mind your man-nerisms. There is a high correlation between challenging Hillary's political ambitions, and prostate cancer. Males are particularly vulnerable. Better watch your, uh, back.

2 posted on 02/14/2003 12:24:35 AM PST by wai-ming
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
The rat race entre is shaping up to be quite entertaining fare.
3 posted on 02/14/2003 12:29:47 AM PST by Jeff Chandler ( ; -)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wai-ming
Is it kosher for us indys to register as Democrats, in order to undermine Demo primaries?
4 posted on 02/14/2003 3:32:22 AM PST by Solamente
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
At least Sharpton has dared to appear on Bill O'Reilly's show. I don't know how many of the others have. The Clintons never did. Nor did Rev. Jesse Jackson who is petrified of O'Reilly.
5 posted on 02/14/2003 4:39:26 AM PST by Dante3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rdb3; Khepera; elwoodp; MAKnight; condolinda; mafree; Trueblackman; FRlurker; Teacher317; ...
Black conservative ping

If you want on (or off) of my black conservative ping list, please let me know via FREEPmail. (And no, you don't have to be black to be on the list!)

Extra warning: this is a high-volume ping list.

6 posted on 02/14/2003 4:41:26 AM PST by mhking ("The home team Iraqis have won the toss and elected to receive...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Solamente
If Sharpton wins the SC primary, that could be the end of John Edwards' candidacy.

I'm lovin' this!
7 posted on 02/14/2003 4:42:51 AM PST by Republic If You Can Keep It
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Solamente
If Sharpton wins the SC primary, that could be the end of John Edwards' candidacy.

I'm lovin' this!
8 posted on 02/14/2003 4:43:46 AM PST by Republic If You Can Keep It
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
Let's not overlook Al's Running Mate . . .

GO AL GO!
PROUD DEMS FOR AL!

9 posted on 02/14/2003 4:56:15 AM PST by Happy2BMe (It's All About You - It's All About Me - It's All About Being Free!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
Clinton has managed to rid his party of numerous troublemakers via various methods. To rid the party of Sharpton should be a particularly welcome challenge for him. He will relish that challenge firstly for the opportunity to employ his clever and wily nature and secondly for the chance to ingratiate his party to him once more.
10 posted on 02/14/2003 6:29:43 AM PST by randita
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Solamente
I'm a rebublican, but in Texas I can vote in either primary and I do intend to vote for Sharpton, just to raise the level of irritation for the Dims.

Of course W gets this vote in the Real Race.
11 posted on 02/14/2003 6:39:09 AM PST by Ace the Biker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: mhking
When asked by a reporter about his role in the Tawana Brawley non-rape case, he replied: "The next time anybody wants to know about Tawana Brawley, I'm going to ask them: 'Do you ask Teddy Kennedy about Chappaquiddick? Do you ask Hillary Clinton about her husband?'"

You gotta love the guy.

"I'll show that suckah Clinton who's the first Black president."

12 posted on 02/14/2003 7:07:50 AM PST by Liz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
Can't help but love the guy! He's so far off the wall that he just might get the nomination. His answer about the Brawley case is a classic. It'll be fun to watch but I'm still voting Republican.
13 posted on 02/14/2003 7:47:37 AM PST by Marysecretary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Solamente
It's not only "kosher" to vote for Sharpton in the primary, it's encouraged.

Send checks to:

Rev. Al Sharpton Presidential Exploratory Committee
PO Box 25812
Washington, DC 20007

http://www.sharptonexplore2004.com/
14 posted on 02/14/2003 10:02:17 AM PST by WaveThatFlag
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: randita
To rid the party of Sharpton should be a particularly welcome challenge for [Clinton]....

Decisions, decisions....


15 posted on 02/14/2003 10:21:58 AM PST by Plutarch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
Look at this poll the St. Louis Post-Dispatch pulled after some Freeping!

Question of the day:

At this point, who would you like to be the Democratic presidential candidate next year?
Howard Dean 1%

Dick Gephardt 4%

John Kerry 2%

Joe Lieberman 2%

Carol Moseley-Braun 8%

Al Sharpton 80%


Surveys are unscientific and for entertainment only.

16 posted on 02/21/2003 12:53:46 PM PST by Paleo Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson