Skip to comments.
THE FIRST LATINO SUPREME COURT JUSTICE? [MIGUEL! Hint: LBJ appointed Thurgood Marshall]
FindLaw's Legal Commentary ^
| Oct. 17, 2002
| KEVIN R. JOHNSON
Posted on 02/13/2003 7:14:11 PM PST by Ragtime Cowgirl
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-25 next last
To: Ragtime Cowgirl
To the Democrats, no-one else's voice matters other than their own.
2
posted on
02/13/2003 7:32:46 PM PST
by
P.O.E.
To: Ragtime Cowgirl
I thought it was rumored that the first Latino Supreme Court Justice would be W.H. Counsel, Gonzales?
3
posted on
02/13/2003 7:34:18 PM PST
by
Pan_Yans Wife
(Lurking since 2000.)
To: Ragtime Cowgirl
The democrats will do everything in their power to prevent the first latino justice from being chosen by the GOP. They will not allow the GOP to have that feather in their cap. That trophy on their shelf etc....
To: Howlin; Utah Girl; PhiKapMom; Mo1; Darlin'; justshe; Carolinamom; hchutch; votelife; TLBSHOW; ...
FYI.
But even so, the appointment of a Latino to the Supreme Court would signal a movement toward full membership for Latinos in American social life, just as Thurgood Marshall's appointment did for African Americans.Why the Dems. are fighting this so hard? They think Miguel will understand hispanic discrimination and bring hispanics to the GOP? I agree.
5
posted on
02/13/2003 7:38:15 PM PST
by
Ragtime Cowgirl
("This nomination in no way deserves a filibuster." - Washington Post)
To: Ragtime Cowgirl
Democrats still believe they own all minorities. They look at this as theft of their property. They feel as though all minorities are bought and paid for with social programs and broken promises. Latinos will not be taken advantage of, the way blacks have been with their 95% plus, voting block, sheep mentality.
To: Pan_Yans Wife
Certainly a possibility, but I think the Dems. are more concerned with Miguel.
Mr. Gonzalez angered a few on both sides when he revised President Bush's U of M affirmative action position, I think.
7
posted on
02/13/2003 7:41:32 PM PST
by
Ragtime Cowgirl
("This nomination in no way deserves a filibuster." - Washington Post)
To: Ragtime Cowgirl
Check out this article that Norm's Revenge posted:
Bush nominates Palo Alto Latina for appeals court bench (9th)
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/842916/posts
And in Post #12 on that thread from Jackbill he discusses the MO Circuit!
You all are going to love that thread! Filibuster time straight ahead!
8
posted on
02/13/2003 7:44:08 PM PST
by
PhiKapMom
(Bush/Cheney 2004)
To: Ragtime Cowgirl
This has got to be a tidal wave building on the dems.
9
posted on
02/13/2003 7:45:10 PM PST
by
swheats
To: Ragtime Cowgirl
The most obvious answer to you rhetorical question is that most Hispanics are Catholic and pro-life. It's about abortion. Pure and simple.
10
posted on
02/13/2003 7:45:12 PM PST
by
RJayneJ
(Are there any quilters out there?)
To: Ron in Acreage; RonDog
They will not allow the GOP to have that feather in their cap.This is the argument, isn't it? Not abortion, or any other single issue - they're terrified Miguel might someday be a GOP 'Thurgood Marshall'.
That puts the battle in a whole new light.
11
posted on
02/13/2003 7:45:44 PM PST
by
Ragtime Cowgirl
("This nomination in no way deserves a filibuster." - Washington Post)
To: PhiKapMom
Wow. Thanks for the link! Henry Waxman must be furious. (^: If President Bush is willing to fight this hard with everything on his shoulders, how can we not?
12
posted on
02/13/2003 7:52:00 PM PST
by
Ragtime Cowgirl
("This nomination in no way deserves a filibuster." - Washington Post)
To: Ragtime Cowgirl
Fair enough article, although the fawning over Marshall was a little much. Marshall was a civil rights pioneer, but after his appointment to the USSC he never seemed to grow - - he just got bitter and went overboard with the goofy, liberal activism. Clarence Thomas is far brighter and certainly has more respect for the Constitution than Marshall ever did.
By the way, I thought it was curious that this article omitted Reagan's appointment of the first woman Supreme Court justice. That was pretty ground-breaking too.
13
posted on
02/13/2003 8:37:57 PM PST
by
Lancey Howard
(Gotta love televised Democrat Party suicide! Filthy scumbags.)
To: Ragtime Cowgirl
Anyone who thinks the White House isn't going to win this one just hasn' been paying attention for the past 2 years.
14
posted on
02/13/2003 8:56:50 PM PST
by
Darlin'
(The choice is clear, you stand with us or you stand with terrorist)
To: Darlin'
Bump
15
posted on
02/13/2003 9:33:12 PM PST
by
PRND21
To: Darlin'
Anyone who thinks the White House isn't going to win this one just hasn' been paying attention for the past 2 years.
LOL! I believe that President Bush is going to have to single-handedly save the Democratic Party from extinction if we are to have a two-party system.
To: PhiKapMom; Ragtime Cowgirl; All
You all are going to love that thread! Filibuster time straight ahead! Do you suppose that if he keeps stringing conservative appointments he can wear the 'RATS out?
The 'RATS are shameless, caring only about power for themselves, and not at all for their constituents...


I'm a Dirty 'RAT !
17
posted on
02/14/2003 4:53:37 AM PST
by
MeekOneGOP
(Bu-bye SADdam. You're soon to meet your buddy Stalin in Hades.)
To: MeeknMing
Love the drip, drip, drip of nominees for the bench! Absolutely perfect strategy IMO!
18
posted on
02/14/2003 6:33:54 AM PST
by
PhiKapMom
(Bush/Cheney 2004)
To: Ragtime Cowgirl
If my memory serves me well, I think the first Hispanic Supreme Court was Benjamin Cardozo. This might turn on how you define Hispanic.
19
posted on
02/14/2003 6:44:24 AM PST
by
monocle
To: RJayneJ
I hope you're right. Members of the Hispanic and Black Congressional Caucus(ses), along with their Hollywood allies, US professors, ANSWER and the DNC - and under the deceptive piety of the NCC - cry racism if anyone questions their patriotism - after they publically support Lula, Chavez, Castro, the WSW and condemn America. Miguel is not
their man - and they are loud and
organized...
...and some of them are working on Capitol Hill.
20
posted on
02/14/2003 6:50:23 AM PST
by
Ragtime Cowgirl
("This nomination in no way deserves a filibuster." - Washington Post)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-25 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson