Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Albright: I Don't Know Why Clinton Turned Down Bin Laden Deal

Posted on 02/09/2003 10:49:02 AM PST by Free ThinkerNY

NewsMax.com

Sunday Feb. 9, 2003

Albright: I Don't Know Why Clinton Turned Down Bin Laden Deal--

Former Secretary of State Madeleine Albright said Sunday that she couldn't explain why ex-president Bill Clinton turned down a deal with the government of Sudan to take Osama bin Laden into custody seven years ago. But she admitted that, "obviously, in hindsight, one would wish that some other action had been taken."

Albright feigned ignorance of the Clinton-bin Laden extradition deal during the following exchange with NBC "Meet the Press" host Tim Russert:

RUSSERT: In May of 1996 under pressure from the United States and Saudi Arabia, the Sudanese government asked bin Laden to leave. He returned to Afghanistan permanently..... Was it a mistake to let Osama bin Laden leave Sudan - or at least not apprehend him in Qatar on his way to Afghanistan?

ALBRIGHT: As I understand it, and I was ambassador to the U.N. at the time, was that basically we felt that he was too intricately involved with some of the activities in Sudan, which was a major issue for us. And that it was better to get him out of there.

Obviously, in hindsight, one would wish that some other action had been taken. But, for the most part, that was a decision made on the basis of information at that time, that he was playing the terrorist game there and that there had in fact been terrorist activity. As you know, there was an attempt on President Mubarak's life that came out of that area. And that it was probably better to move (bin Laden) out.

RUSSERT: But why not capture him, apprehend him while he was refueling in Qatar?

ALBRIGHT: I can't answer that question. (End of excerpt)

While Ms. Albright claims she doesn't know the answer to that question, Mr. Russert certainly does - though he declined to challenge her. But in fact, in May 1996, ex-President Clinton gave the order not to take bin Laden into custody, a blunder he confessed in a speech to a Long Island, N.Y. business group last year.

"Mr. bin Laden used to live in Sudan. He was expelled from Saudi Arabia in 1991, then he went to Sudan," Clinton told the Long Island Association in on Feb. 15, 2002.

"And we'd been hearing that the Sudanese wanted America to start dealing with them again. They released him. At the time, 1996, he had committed no crime against America so I did not bring him here because we had no basis on which to hold him, though we knew he wanted to commit crimes against America."

Clinton continued:

"So I pleaded with the Saudis to take him, 'cause they could have. But they thought it was a hot potato and they didn't and that's how he wound up in Afghanistan." (End of Excerpt)

Though Mr. Clinton's confession has been widely covered in such high profile venues as the Fox News Channel's "O'Reilly Factor," "Hannity & Colmes," WOR Radio's "The Bob Grant Show" and, just the night before Albright' protested her ignorance, WABC Radio's "Batchelor & Alexander Show," network news organizations like Russert's NBC News have embargoed coverage of the bombshell development. ( Click Here to listen to Bill Clinton admit that he let bin Laden off the hook.)

The big media cover-up has allowed New York Sen. Hillary Clinton to escape confrontation on the issue of her husband's blunder. And two weeks ago, in an interview with WLIE Radio's Mike Siegel, she tried to blame President Bush for "mishandling" North Korea and for not stopping Osama bin Laden before 9/11.


TOPICS: Activism/Chapters; Extended News; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-152 next last
To: timestax
bttt
101 posted on 03/02/2003 11:26:56 AM PST by timestax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: muggs
bump
102 posted on 03/02/2003 11:31:57 AM PST by timestax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: timestax
BTT
103 posted on 03/02/2003 2:57:59 PM PST by Bigg Red (Defend America against her most powerful enemy -- the Democrats.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: timestax
BTT
104 posted on 03/02/2003 2:57:59 PM PST by Bigg Red (Defend America against her most powerful enemy -- the Democrats.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: timestax
BTT
105 posted on 03/02/2003 2:58:00 PM PST by Bigg Red (Defend America against her most powerful enemy -- the Democrats.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: timestax
BTT
106 posted on 03/02/2003 2:58:02 PM PST by Bigg Red (Defend America against her most powerful enemy -- the Democrats.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: timestax
bump
107 posted on 03/03/2003 3:45:11 PM PST by timestax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: Free ThinkerNY
"Albright: I Don't Know Why Clinton Turned Down Bin Laden Deal"

Maddie clearly does not understand the principle of "professional courtesy".....

108 posted on 03/03/2003 3:53:07 PM PST by tracer (/b>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Arkinsaw
buumpppp
109 posted on 03/03/2003 3:56:47 PM PST by timestax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Free ThinkerNY
bump for newbies to rad, and Albright to read also!!
110 posted on 03/03/2003 4:18:08 PM PST by timestax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: timestax
bttt for newbies to read!
111 posted on 03/03/2003 11:35:07 PM PST by timestax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: muggs
bump
112 posted on 03/04/2003 9:36:49 AM PST by timestax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies]

To: timestax
bump
113 posted on 03/04/2003 2:11:07 PM PST by timestax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies]

To: Free ThinkerNY
bump
114 posted on 03/04/2003 2:34:30 PM PST by GOPJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sacajaweau
bump
115 posted on 03/04/2003 4:11:10 PM PST by muggs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Mo1
bump to the top
116 posted on 03/04/2003 10:46:29 PM PST by timestax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: muggs
bttt
117 posted on 03/05/2003 4:10:48 PM PST by timestax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies]

To: timestax
bttt
118 posted on 03/05/2003 5:48:05 PM PST by timestax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies]

To: Captain Beyond
bump to the top
119 posted on 03/06/2003 10:35:07 PM PST by timestax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: muggs
bump
120 posted on 03/06/2003 10:37:58 PM PST by timestax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 119 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-152 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson