1 posted on
02/08/2003 4:40:22 PM PST by
Pokey78
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-34 next last
To: Pokey78
... "He has this lunatic view he is the voice of the people" ...
Indeed.
2 posted on
02/08/2003 4:48:15 PM PST by
Asclepius
(hoping for the best)
To: Pokey78
Isn't it refreshing to live in a country that had the balls to tell their former king to go to hell? May the inbred, adulterous bonnie Prince Charlie rot there as well...
3 posted on
02/08/2003 4:51:43 PM PST by
egarvue
(Martin Sheen is not my president...)
To: Pokey78
Does anyone care what the human tampon thinks?
4 posted on
02/08/2003 4:52:59 PM PST by
Hugin
To: Pokey78
That big-eared bloke has good taste too.
Seems like he would have rather kept the horse-faced gene in his family, considering the old ugly bag he preferred over Diana.
To: Pokey78; MadIvan
What relation, exactly, is Chuck to the pro-NAZI Duke of York of the WWII era?
To: MadIvan
Enlighten us, please. What is Mad Ivan's take on this?
7 posted on
02/08/2003 4:57:44 PM PST by
NonValueAdded
("Either you are with us, or you are with the terrorists." GWB 9/20/01)
To: Thinkin' Gal; Jeremiah Jr
Charleswho reads the Koran every day and often adopts Islamic dress at homespends long hours discussing the Middle East's problems with Saudi royal family members. As the head of the Church of England, does he ever read his Bible ?
Me thinks the Crowns's fear of a Muslim too close to the throne (in the case of Dodi Fayed and Princess Di) was misplaced. It seems that Charles has taken on alien robes.
9 posted on
02/08/2003 4:58:24 PM PST by
happygrl
To: Pokey78
Charles should know by Bubba's example that the American public doesn't care about the opinions of a man who has made a living off of the public dole his entire life.
To: Pokey78
"Charleswho reads the Koran every day and often adopts Islamic dress at home"What the?
This bozo is supposed to be "the defender of the Faith (Christianity)"
12 posted on
02/08/2003 5:02:13 PM PST by
keithtoo
To: Pokey78
If it weren't for Tony Blair, there would be no more monarchy following Princess Diana's death.
Ugly man should just shut up and go back to talking to his veggies.
16 posted on
02/08/2003 5:08:17 PM PST by
OldFriend
(THE GAME IS OVER)
To: Pokey78
More meaningless drivel from the big eared, adultery committing, horse faced woman shagging, pompous twit.
To: Pokey78
Buckingham Palace was red faced, a few years ago, as taped convos surfaced between Charles and Camilla-suspected of being leaked by British intel.No one disputed their authenticity . From eonline-
" The tabloid press broke the news of their earthy relationship three years ago, publishing excerpts from phone conversations, including one in which Charles expressed his wish to be reincarnated as a tampon so that he might always be in her knickers"
To: Pokey78
"Prince Charles...is...AGAINST America."And IF this be true, then he is a fool.
To: Pokey78
Yes...this and the way he treated his ex-wife just proves that the Windsors are living proof that intermarriage produces imbeciles.
MadIvan, what do you say?
28 posted on
02/08/2003 5:50:18 PM PST by
Keith
To: Pokey78
To: Pokey78
I can see why the British decided that the Royals should only be around for ceremonial affairs and were to stay out of the politics of the country.
I wonder if the Queen now sees that Charles shouldn't be King.
31 posted on
02/08/2003 5:59:39 PM PST by
chantal7
(Carter and Clinton aren't relevant anymore. When are they gonna get the msg?)
To: Pokey78
England basically has a constitutional monarchy. Ever since the Glorious Revolution of 1688, and especially after they brought in the House of Hanover, British monarchs have done whatever the government said they should do.
We don't know what Queen Elizabeth II thinks about most political matters, because she simply does what she's told and keeps her private views to herself. By doing that, she has accumulated considerable authority and admiration.
I'm inclined to agree with Ivan that it would be wise to skip over Charles. Even the good things he has done, such as attacking modern architecture, have been done in an absurd and eccentric way. This current behavior is really the last straw. He cannot be trusted. If he did anything like this after he were crowned king, parliament would simply be forced to abolish the monarchy, and that would be a pity.
32 posted on
02/08/2003 6:00:51 PM PST by
Cicero
To: Pokey78
Tag Line Clear
33 posted on
02/08/2003 6:05:57 PM PST by
chantal7
To: Pokey78
To: Pokey78
Critics say the prince likes to cut a dash in the Paras' coveted red beret?strutting around with a chestful of medals on his tunic. What a disgrace. This is one of the most unpleasant things about royalty and aristocracy. Cosseted toffs and nancy boys like Chuck Windsor have not earned the right to wear those berets and medals.
Imagine some pimply young Kennedy or Bush or Rockefeller whippersnapper being made an honorary commandant of Seal Team Six, and going around sporting the budweiser badge on his uniform. Absolutely repellent.
I was born in England and love it dearly, but it is time to get rid of these foreign parasites.
Let them swan around in colliery-band costumes and gold braid all they want, let them award each other the most ridiculous medals and orders they can dream up, let them continue their inbreeding and preening for the paparazzi, let them award themselves any preposterous title they like-- but turn them out of the public's castles and manors, let them earn their keep like anyone else.
And don't give them medals and commissions for which working-class Tommies like my grandfather fought and bled and died.
-ccm
40 posted on
02/08/2003 6:49:31 PM PST by
ccmay
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-34 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson