1 posted on
02/07/2003 8:44:22 AM PST by
RCW2001
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-33 next last
To: RCW2001
What's France?
2 posted on
02/07/2003 8:44:42 AM PST by
jriemer
To: RCW2001
"The word is no. I am therefore going anyway."--Admiral James T. Kirk
3 posted on
02/07/2003 8:48:28 AM PST by
mhking
("The visiting American team will be kicking off shortly...")
To: RCW2001
Looks like Blair got doublecrossed by the French in their hint of abstaining. What do the French have to hide in Iraq?
Time to tell the United Nations Security Council to stuff it and if the UN wants money ask France, Germany, Russia, and China.
If we have to go with a coalition of Governments outside the UN, then the UN is worthless and doesn't deserve another red cent from this Country. Use the money for the US to fund our War on Terrorism. At the same time, give them an eviction notice to vacate the United States!
5 posted on
02/07/2003 8:51:30 AM PST by
PhiKapMom
(Bush/Cheney 2004)
To: RCW2001
I think its seriously time to pull our interests out of France and possibly vacate the UN altogther.
To: RCW2001
The burden isn't on us to show that the inspections have failed. The burden is on Iraq to disarm and comply.
There's a huge difference there, and one that France knows is totally disingenuous on its part.
Nor will we accept their premise that only the UN can authorize war. We have not surrendered our sovereignty or authority to act in our national interest to a UN committe with veto power.
It's sad that France has.
If they block the NATO decision to send forces to Turkey on Monday, there is a strong chance that NATO will dissolve. Perhaps not immediately, but inevitably.
France is playing an international game of chicken here, in more than one way.
7 posted on
02/07/2003 8:52:21 AM PST by
Dog Gone
To: RCW2001
"If we don't agree, well then, we won't agree," the aide added. "And that won't be the end of anything..."Oh, it'll be the end of something, little Mr. Man. Wait and see.
8 posted on
02/07/2003 8:53:28 AM PST by
wizardoz
(I'll show you "imperialist"!)
To: RCW2001
Perhaps a more appropriate HQ building for the UN would be the old League of Nations building. Thanks to la belle France, the United Nations is achieving the same level of relevance as the League.
(See -- we should thank the French.)
9 posted on
02/07/2003 8:53:46 AM PST by
No Truce With Kings
(The opinions expressed are mine! Mine! MINE! All Mine!)
To: RCW2001
The frogs don't understand that their veto is not going to matter. The frogs are irrelevant!!
To: RCW2001
"And that won't be the end of anything, just like de Gaulle's decision to pull out of NATO or his Phnom Penh speech did not mean the end of French-American relations. Those ties have a thick skin." Cowardly fools still don't get it. I wouldn't be particularly sorry to see us break relations with France over this.
To: RCW2001
From where I'm sitting, it appears as if Jacques is strapped...
13 posted on
02/07/2003 8:55:24 AM PST by
Snowy
(Tick off a lib -> Work hard, earn lots of money, and be happy)
To: RCW2001
"An unnamed Chirac aide told Le Monde that France was ready to risk serious strains in its relations with pro-war powers United States and Britain to defend its view that only the United Nations has the right to declare a war on Iraq." Stupid POS!
17 posted on
02/07/2003 9:00:00 AM PST by
blam
To: All
Who CARES what the Frenchies say?ALLIES FOR LIBERTY & FREEDOM?
THESE ARE the 20 ALLIES for IRAQI FREEDOM
U.S., Britian, Hungary, Bulgaria, Romania, Poland, Italy, Portugal, Turkey,
Slovakia, Denmark, Czech, Spain, Quatar, Jordan, Albania, Kuwait, Israeli, Australia and Japan
U.S., British, Hungarian, Bulgarian, Romanian, Polish, Italy, Portugal,
Slovakia, Denmark, Czech, Spanish, Quatar, Kuwaiti, Israeli, Australian, Albanian and Japanese
FREE the IRAQI women & children!!! GRAPHICAL VERSION: WHO has joined the ALLIES FOR LIBERTY & FREEDOM?
THESE ARE the 26 ALLIES for IRAQI peoples (women & children included) FREEDOM
U.S., Britian, Australia, Hungary, Bulgaria, Romania, Poland, Italy, Portugal, Turkey, Lithuania
Slovakia, Denmark, Czech Republic, Spain, Quatar, Jordan, Albania, Kuwait, Israel, Slovenia, Estonia, Latvia, Macedonia, Croatia, and Japan
FREE the IRAQI people!!!
|
What OTHER countries want the IRAQI citizens FREEDOM? |
|
UK |
AUSTRALIA |
|
ISRAEL |
POLAND |
SPAIN |
CZECH |
PORTUGAL |
KUWAIT |
HUNGARY |
QATAR |
ITALY |
JAPAN |
JORDAN |
DENMARK |
SLOVAKIA |
TURKEY |
ESTONIA |
LATVIA |
LITHUANIA |
MACEDONIA |
SLOVENIA |
ALBANIA |
CROATIA |
BULGARIA |
goodnesswins |
|
|
20 posted on
02/07/2003 9:02:48 AM PST by
goodnesswins
(Thank the Military for your freedom and security....and thank a Rich person for jobs.)
To: RCW2001
This is interesting and I don't see valid reasons for France to have agreed to the Security Council resolution. France is completely out of line because they agreed to the resolution, but they're trying to play games figuring they can do this to the United States because we aren't Iraq. I believe France is concerned with its dealings with Iraq coming to the fore when war happens and Iraq's secrets are revealed. Why doesn't France just admit they find it acceptable for Saddam Hussein to have weapons of mass destruction and continue on with the programs. The French are just sick and we've got to show them they are betraying our country and putting the security of the world at risk due to their OWN GREED and refusal to deal with Iraq and letting Iraq continue on. They are the problem too. We should dig up every American serviceman on French soild, it is a disgrace. That country is a disgrace and we should never offer assistance to them in their own times of national security because they show repeated nonconcern for our own.
To: RCW2001
First Baghdad, then Paris.
Big Food wants the truffle fields siezed to provide a cheap Perigeaux Sauce precursor.
So9
22 posted on
02/07/2003 9:04:16 AM PST by
Servant of the Nine
(We are the Hegemon. We can do anything we damned well please.)
To: RCW2001
France; The only country to have a monument for each one of its defeats.
To: RCW2001
It must truly suck to be an irrelevant, has-been, self-serving, corrupt, decadent country. I can't wait to find out the extent of French "cooperation" with Iraq after we go in and turn on the spotlight of truth.
27 posted on
02/07/2003 9:13:33 AM PST by
arm958
To: RCW2001
France does not seem to understand the logistical realities of an invasion, doing it while forces are available and in position, before the summer heat, and so forth. They are playing right into Iraq's hands, Iraq knowing full well that if it can only delay things a couple months it probably won't be invaded at all until next year and that the expense and strain of the US keeping forces that long will make the whole project collapse. At which point, France can puff itself up as the big defender of peace, Hussein can keep building up his WMD stockpile and become the leader of anti-American sentiment, and the US can just go crawl under a rock for all the influence it will have in global affairs.
To: RCW2001
On a another post, a FReeper by the name of Mr. B, succintly identified France's reason for not supporting disarming Hussein. He said that much of the Iraqi war material (WMD) will have "Made in France" labels.
To: RCW2001
"If the question were put today, France would say no to a resolution authorising the use of force," Apparently the only country the France won't surrender to is the one resposible for it's existence.
38 posted on
02/07/2003 9:44:12 AM PST by
HumanaeVitae
(If Eminem's music is not crap, then the term 'crap' has no meaning.)
To: RCW2001
I hope they do veto. We'll attack anyway along with our real allies, and thereby clearly demonstrate the UN's irrelevance.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-33 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson