Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Don't let Hillary electronically 'brand' U.S. babies!
http://thelibertycommittee.org ^ | thelibertycommittee.org

Posted on 02/05/2003 10:07:46 PM PST by justrepublican

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-39 last
To: justrepublican
Pretty soon someone will show up and comment:

"Well if you've done nothing illegal, then you have nothing to worry about."

And then they'll realize that their NWO-supporting auto-response comment is misplaced on this thread.

21 posted on 02/06/2003 11:04:02 AM PST by asformeandformyhouse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hocndoc
Frightening. I know an allergist who dropped Medicare for this very reason. I wonder if he'll remain unaffected under this new act?
22 posted on 02/06/2003 11:25:17 AM PST by Scupoli
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: justrepublican
This sounds like an urban legend
23 posted on 02/06/2003 11:25:53 AM PST by AppyPappy (Caesar si viveret, ad remum dareris.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: justrepublican
Is my ss# being shared internationally?

Your ss# is on record with virtually anyone and everyone you have dealings with.

C'mon, we're not talking about a government-implanted microchip here, it's just a medical ID # for Christ's sake!

24 posted on 02/06/2003 11:37:20 AM PST by winin2000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: justrepublican
Don't you have a serial number on your birth certificate...Don't worry any day now they will chip you from day one at the hospital at the same time they give you your shots...
25 posted on 02/06/2003 12:14:41 PM PST by MD_Willington_1976
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mistaken1
You are right, of course, if one uses characters.

However, the article specifically said, "ID number"

26 posted on 02/06/2003 12:49:50 PM PST by Elsie (I trust in Jesus.... THOUSANDS OF EXISTING MANUSCRIPTS speak of Him!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: justrepublican
It sounded like they were all going to get little chips at the base of their little necks.

I'd think Hitlery would go for the tatto on the forearm like her name sake did in the 40's.

27 posted on 02/06/2003 1:07:44 PM PST by AFreeBird
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: justrepublican
Hitlery is really an ugly soul.
28 posted on 02/06/2003 3:26:18 PM PST by Man of the Right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Elsie
True. Based on the recent track record of the vast majority of our esteemed press corps I was assuming that this reporter would be just as imprecise with the details of the plan. {:^)>
29 posted on 02/06/2003 4:20:18 PM PST by mistaken1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: justrepublican
Bumping for a later barf...er...read...:<).

Here in the state of Oregon, we are beyond broke, I should say scammed by the legislooters, but we are still getting a new plan whereby all newborns will be visited 4 times in their homes by social services. They layed off 100plus state troopers and cut off aid to the elderly, but we will get their social engineering no matter what it costs!

30 posted on 02/06/2003 5:06:34 PM PST by AuntB (YOUR RIGHTS STOP WHERE MY NOSE STARTS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: justrepublican
It is nothing new. 150 years ago it became fashionable in America to tatoo a baby's name and address on it's bottom in case the child was stolen or lost.
31 posted on 02/06/2003 5:08:59 PM PST by Ruy Dias de Bivar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Scupoli
Not if he practices in Texas. Our State legislature wrote a Privacy Act more restrictive than the Federal law, which, in effect forces all Texas medical "providers" to be "compliant."
32 posted on 02/06/2003 6:03:48 PM PST by hocndoc (Choice is the # 1 killer in the US.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: AppyPappy
This sounds like an urban legend

Yes it does, unfortunately it is also true.

33 posted on 02/06/2003 6:13:04 PM PST by StriperSniper (Start heating the TAR, I'll go get the FEATHERS.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: StriperSniper
I'd be more convinced if it was a real source.
34 posted on 02/07/2003 5:40:32 AM PST by AppyPappy (Caesar si viveret, ad remum dareris.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: justrepublican




35 posted on 02/07/2003 5:50:34 AM PST by P.O.E.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: justrepublican
I don't know for sure. However given the globalist pigs big plan I would have to say YES!
36 posted on 02/08/2003 8:31:16 AM PST by ChefKeith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: winin2000
I agree, Hillary knows very well how many Americans react when it comes to number assigning.

No number attached to any human being can control their mind, and the number that too many people get concerned about is not an actual number assigned or placed on their body.

It is what's in the mind that counts, not a number a government assigns.

Hillary is a master of muddying the water, and I am more concerned about what she does with the information she gets from Armed Service Committee briefings that her attempt to start tagging us.
37 posted on 02/08/2003 8:47:19 AM PST by Just mythoughts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: justrepublican
Well what do ya mean by the UK is "branding" babies with numbers? Why is "brand" in quotation marks? We all got numbers anyway-- SSN, driver's licence #, bank account #, telephone #, credit card #, apartment #, # of the beast, etc...
38 posted on 02/08/2003 8:55:47 AM PST by maxwell (Well I'm sure I'd feel much worse if I weren't under such heavy sedation...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: justrepublican
MAKE OUR DAY...RUN HILLARY RUN
39 posted on 02/08/2003 8:58:22 AM PST by Bill Davis FR
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-39 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson