Skip to comments.
Saddams Bodyguard reveals secrets, possible link to North Korea involved
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=30836 ^
| 2-3-03
| judicial meanz
Posted on 02/03/2003 2:18:35 PM PST by judicial meanz
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41 next last
I have seen this article in three places now, so I guess its heading to be some bigger news in a few days. it draws a neat parallel with North Korea.
Apparently the NK's supply Saddam with missile parts and he assembles them near Ramdi.
Wonder how much this leads in to the North Korean escalation of hostilities?
Interesting questions here.
To: judicial meanz
It is beginning to appear more and more as if there is joint collusion between Iraq and North Korea, and that North Korea will try something provocative (not quite big enough to get the world against them or a UN resolution) but something in the way of causing trouble, right after we enjoin the battle with Iraq. And, after all, they are in an alliance, so it will be no surprise that they have been coordinating in this respect.
2
posted on
02/03/2003 2:24:55 PM PST
by
AmericanInTokyo
(And, it wouldn't hurt to 'rumor' to the DPRK that visiting knucklehead peacefreeks WERE ' G-2')
To: judicial meanz
North Korea and China. Interesting. You can only access Saddam by phone right now if you do not have the proper inner circle access code. In a situation like this, the leader himself could have died years ago. Nonone would ever know since he has too many enemies to ever be seen in public. Very creepy situation.
To: justa-hairyape
The unsaid here is just as interesting as the said. Case in point: The China, NK, Iraq collusion, the Marxist anti-war movement with monetary support from all three, and now this.
This is definitely gonna be an intersting year.
To: judicial meanz
read later
To: judicial meanz
The maniacal Saddam, betrayed by one of his own stand-ins. This is so rich, I absolutely love it!
6
posted on
02/03/2003 2:31:09 PM PST
by
jpl
To: AmericanInTokyo
they are in an alliance Our President called it an 'Axis of Evil Alliance'. Back in the cold war there was a moment that sent chills down my backbone. It was when Regan called the Soviet Empire an 'Evil Empire'. That seemed to break the 'spell' the communists had over the world. Their empire began crumbling from that day on. We should not forget the third member of the axis of evil, either. My guess is Saddam has sent some of his WMD to them.
To: justa-hairyape
Gee, if this this guy is supposed to be sodom insane's double....how can anyone 'tell' that it's not the ORIGINAL himself?
To: judicial meanz
It always astonishes me to see Dems taking positions that they know will be refuted easily. They are going to be humiliated. So why do they do it?
If normal folks can get a good idea what Saddam has, just from reading widely and having a long memory, the Dems in Washinton must surely know much better, having as they do access to intelligence briefings.
So when they demand "proof", or deny that proof exists, they must surely know it will all come out in the end, anyway. Why place yourself out on a limb and then start sawing?
I can only assume they are playing to the crowd, and they are banking on a crowd that does not read, that does not have a memory, and that is given to the most shallow of analysis.
Oh, never mind.
9
posted on
02/03/2003 2:39:54 PM PST
by
marron
To: mommadooo3
Got me! Maybe by the hair on his knuckles or something...LOL
To: marron
Rush Limbaugh was talking about that today. He stated that the Democratic strategists had decided the only way they could get political points was to oppose the war at every tack to differentiate themselves from President Bush and undermine his success as a President. That was if the war went bad, they looked good, if it went good, they still had their core constituency, and if it made a lot of casualties and still was won, it would come out in favor of the Democrats.
Apparently, the fact that decisive world opinon could stop this war before it began if a consensus among people and nations occurred never entered into their minds, and all they want is to regain power at any cost.
Couple that with the fact every anti-war Senator and Congresman probably voted for the war resolution, and you being to see their strategy for the next election cycle and how they are going to play the cards.
The most annoying thing is that the Democraps dont care about the young American heros who will die in this war, or anyone else, only about gaining power and putting more of their stupid anti American policies in acion.
Next question- Whats so important about gaining power that your country, its soldiers, and the citizens in it come second?
To: *war_list
To: judicial meanz; All
I think this is a set-up!
I just keep thinking that since all the sites HAVE BEEN MADE PUBLIC - Sadaam has already moved the stuff. When the inspectors get there - ooops, sorry, we have no WMD ...!!
Iraq: Seeeeee ... the U.S. is lying about us.
13
posted on
02/03/2003 3:19:17 PM PST
by
CyberAnt
( Yo! Syracuse)
To: justa-hairyape
It would seem the 'axis of evil' phrase is becoming more and more evident by the hour.
15
posted on
02/03/2003 3:34:31 PM PST
by
Republic
(tommy daschle is a WEASEL OF MASS DISTORTION (tractorman)-so truthful, it almost HURTS!)
To: judicial meanz
The bodyguard one of the reported many doubles Saddam deploys to confuse potential assassins is named Abu Hamdi Mahmoud. Which one is Abu Hamdi Mahmoud?
To: CyberAnt
Yes, it could be a setup.
17
posted on
02/03/2003 3:39:02 PM PST
by
Cicero
To: judicial meanz
When Dubya said "Axis of evil".....a lot of people laughed at the stupid thing, said by what they perceived to be...a stupid man. It's harder...much harder, for those people to reverse their positions now, because their whole world caves with it.
The evidence mounts....and Saddams end grows near. Shudder to think, if Clinton was still here......
To: judicial meanz
Whats so important about gaining power that your country, its soldiers, and the citizens in it come second? A world wide socialist/progressive utopia. Where 'greed' and 'exploitation' of people and mother earth are no more. Just read some of the remarks Nelson 'Cop killer' Mandela has said in the last few years. They still believe in the marxist lie that when a utopian sociallist/marxist controlling structure is in place, there will be no more exploitation and greed. As the world has learned more times then can be counted, just because you do not refer to government greed and exploitation as 'greed' and 'exploitation', that does not mean that 'greed' and 'exploitation' has ceased to occur. Just look at the excesses of any socialist ruling government. Lets randomly pick one. How about the Ba'ath party in Iraq. Gee, that would make a good case study.
On a personnal note, when the State of California impounded my old truck because I could not get it to pass the smog check, I told everyone that the police (acting on behave of the californian state government) stole my truck. You would not believe the wierd looks I got. Like gee man, the government can never 'steal'.
To: judicial meanz
How long will the lamestream press sit on this one? They never learn.
Yoohoo, lamestream press, don't you know by now that this is going to come out, and eventually you will have to report it, no matter how much you hate Republicans?
FR is now officially recognized (and cited) on The Wall Street Journal editorial page. Do you think we're just going to go away after that?
We know you are here, reading.
You know it is going to come out; the groundswell is just starting.
So you might as well be the first to break this. We don't care if you cite us; we just want the truth known, good or bad.
Some of you journalists are arguing with your editor about the article you just wrote about this, but he/she won't let you publish. Show him/her this post.
Yoohoo, Mr. Editor, aren't you sick of being last?
20
posted on
02/03/2003 3:43:43 PM PST
by
MonroeDNA
(What's the frequency, Kenneth?)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson