Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Tailgunner Joe; TLBSHOW; bonesmccoy; Dog; Lael; Gracey; XBob; Budge; wirestripper; DoughtyOne
This ET story is nothing. We had another O-ring failure similar to the one which brought down Challenger because of the switch to AlGore-Friendly solvents. Why is nobody talking about that one?
KENNEDY SPACE CENTER SPACE SHUTTLE STATUS REPORT
(UPDATED) FRIDAY, JULY 12, 1996 (7:07 PM EDT)

Mission managers decided late today to not roll Atlantis back out to the pad in order to destack the vehicle from its current set of solid rocket boosters and re-stack it to another set. Atlantis has been in the Vehicle Assembly Building since Wednesday when it was taken off Pad 39A due to threats from Hurricane Bertha.

This decision will delay Atlantis' launch until mid-September.

Atlantis' boosters are being replaced because of hot gas seepage into the field joints of the Columbia STS-78 boosters, which was launched on June 20.

An investigation found that the most probable cause of the seepage was related to the use of a new adhesive and cleaning fluid.

The investigation also concluded that the risk of a field joint failure was improbable and that the STS-79 boosters were safe to fly. The decision to replace the STS-79 boosters, which utilized the new adhesive used on STS-78, was made to provide an opportunity to better understand the J-joint failure and to improve the safety margin of the field joints.

Additional information and timelines for destacking and restacking Atlantis will be available next week.


35 posted on 02/06/2003 4:39:20 AM PST by snopercod
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]


To: snopercod
Good catch.
42 posted on 02/06/2003 6:49:21 AM PST by DoughtyOne (Freeper Caribbean Cruise May 31-June 6, Staterooms As Low As $610 Per Person For Entire Week!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]

To: snopercod
use of a new adhesive and cleaning fluid.

Does this have to do with elimination of the FREON "bath" replaced with the WATER "bath?" I asked why NASA didn't ask for a waiver to continue with FREON solution since it left no residue. I'm not too swift on this subject, but know that we spent big $$'s to change the facility to please Clinton's EPA mandates. Again, I don't understand why we couldn't get waivers.

57 posted on 02/06/2003 9:14:47 AM PST by Gracey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]

To: snopercod
Thanks for the ping!
69 posted on 02/07/2003 5:53:29 AM PST by Budge (God Bless FReepers!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson