Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

California: Planners seek to ease Prop. 13 rules
Orange County Register ^ | Feb 1, 2003

Posted on 02/01/2003 1:10:19 PM PST by John Jorsett

Edited on 04/14/2004 10:05:45 PM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]

SACRAMENTO

(Excerpt) Read more at 2.ocregister.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events; US: California
KEYWORDS: calgov2002; knife
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-43 next last

1 posted on 02/01/2003 1:10:19 PM PST by John Jorsett
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
Ping. Looks like we're in an eternal battle with the forces of darkness tax-raising.
2 posted on 02/01/2003 1:11:43 PM PST by John Jorsett
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: John Jorsett
Well,
Looks like it's time for another tax revolt in California.
3 posted on 02/01/2003 1:13:11 PM PST by Commander8
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: John Jorsett
"Characterizing it as a modest change"

Modest change. Sure, all it does is remove a very important protection for the taxpaying propery owners, to keep them from getting raped by those who endlessly want to raise taxes.

Modest change, my butt.
4 posted on 02/01/2003 1:15:21 PM PST by sd-joe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: John Jorsett; *calgov2002; snopercod; Grampa Dave; Carry_Okie; SierraWasp; Gophack; RonDog; ...
Thanks for posting this!

calgov2002:

calgov2002: for old calgov2002 articles. 

calgov2002: for new calgov2002 articles. 

Other Bump Lists at: Free Republic Bump List Register



5 posted on 02/01/2003 1:21:02 PM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach (Impeach Davis!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Commander8
Representatives of nearly 5,000 California urban, environmental and transportation planners.....

Note these are not elected representatives, but then noting the elected representatives (rat majority) have decided to increase vehicle registration fees (taxes) by over 100% without a state constitutionally mandated two-thirds majority (what are laws to rats anyway)it looks like this state may just as well let anybody run it.

6 posted on 02/01/2003 1:24:38 PM PST by vger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: John Jorsett
Representatives of nearly 5,000 California urban, environmental and transportation planners say they'll fight this year for changes in Proposition 13...

I translate that introduction to mean that these are people who receive their livelihood from the government, either municipal, county, state or federal and want more money to spend. Their health insurance, their vacations, their retirement are all funded by government sources and they cannot understand why anyone wouldn't want their taxes raised. After all, when taxes go up, so do their wages/salaries due to built in COLA's.

Hey! why don't we just tax ourselves to PARADISE!

7 posted on 02/01/2003 1:31:42 PM PST by elbucko (Sacramento, Moscow by the river.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: John Jorsett
you are essentially allowing those who don't own property to levy taxes on those who do," said Jon Coupal

Why were non-taxpayers ever allowed to vote in the first place? It's not their money that gets spent.

8 posted on 02/01/2003 1:34:01 PM PST by FITZ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: John Jorsett
Representatives of nearly 5,000 California urban, environmental and transportation planners say they'll fight this year for changes in Proposition 13 to raise more money for parks, transit-oriented growth and farmland preservation.

Reads:

Representatives of nearly 5,000 California urban, environmental and transportation planners demagogues say they'll fight this year for changes in Proposition 13 to raise steal more money for parks, transit-oriented growth and farmland preservation their leeching, non-profit ponzi schemes.

9 posted on 02/01/2003 1:34:08 PM PST by Sir Francis Dashwood (LET'S ROLL!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: John Jorsett
I heard last night on Al Rantel's program here in So Cal, maybe it was posted here before, that 45,000 Californian's pay 33% of the state's income tax. That's amazing.
10 posted on 02/01/2003 1:34:46 PM PST by socal_parrot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Commander8
Well, Looks like it's time for another tax revolt in California.

Quote:

"Then the new Los Angeles County property tax assessments came out. The average assessment would increase 125%. Some would triple. Finally, in the weeks leading up to the election, the state surplus was reveled to be $5 billion. The anti-Prop 13 campaign collapsed.

From "Revolt of the Haves" by Robert Kuttner.

Time to rebel or time to leave. California is doomed.

11 posted on 02/01/2003 1:42:17 PM PST by elbucko (Sacramento, Moscow by the river.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: John Jorsett
Prop. 13 has confused the state's tax system

Limiting the ability of elected Democrats to gogue property owners is "confusing"?. Seems a simple concept to me. Look elsewhere to fund your utopian state.

disrupted state development patterns to encourage sprawl

The state has a "development pattern"? My guess is the group is complaining that resonable taxes are not forcing sale of land to developers near the urban margins

and created a severe housing shortage.

4 million illegal aliens (and their progeny), in the last twenty years, have created the housing shortage, not prpoerty tax relief.

12 posted on 02/01/2003 1:42:30 PM PST by Amerigomag
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sd-joe
Modest change, my butt.

Perhaps Jonathan Swift is among them. He's the satirist who authored "A Modest Proposal," in which he advocated the Irish devouring their children so that they wouldn't be a burden to their parents or country.

13 posted on 02/01/2003 1:47:37 PM PST by John Jorsett
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: John Jorsett
so --- fire the planners.
14 posted on 02/01/2003 1:51:53 PM PST by Dan(9698)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vger
the elected representatives (rat majority) have decided to increase vehicle registration fees (taxes) by over 100% without a state constitutionally mandated two-thirds majority

You might be interested in this press conference by Tom McClintock detailing how the Republicans are going to fight this increase.

15 posted on 02/01/2003 1:57:03 PM PST by John Jorsett
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: FITZ
Good point. Why are non-property owners allowed to vote on property taxes. In early colonial days didn't you need to be a property owner to vote? Perhaps we should just have government workers NOT vote as a conflict of intererest. (ok a bit of sarcasm here)

It does however, point out why the founding fathers did NOT want a pure democracy. The rif raf vote themselves access to the national treasury.
16 posted on 02/01/2003 2:18:45 PM PST by longtermmemmory
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: John Jorsett
"in which he advocated the Irish devouring their children so that they wouldn't be a burden to their parents or country."

LOL, yeah it just depends on what the meaning of modest is.

That is probably what we will have to do to pay the taxes these jerks want.
17 posted on 02/01/2003 3:29:16 PM PST by sd-joe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: John Jorsett
A politician who robs Peter to pay Paul WILL ALWAYS HAVE THE SUPPORT OF PAUL. And there are a sh*tload more Pauls in California than just about anywhere.
18 posted on 02/01/2003 3:37:59 PM PST by Lizavetta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: John Jorsett
Sounds like a few bureaucrats are ready for a new career?

Names, please...

19 posted on 02/01/2003 3:42:37 PM PST by Publius6961
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: John Jorsett
"There's not a lot of incentive for cities to build houses...."What does this mean?
I am in Pennsylvania and things work differently here. In Pennsylvania, homes are built by builders who develop parcels of land and then sell these newly constructed homes to homebuyers.

Representatives of nearly 5,000 California urban, environmental and transportation planners...

Bury these sick scumbags - - do not give them an inch.
I recommend keeping them busy with lawsuits.

20 posted on 02/01/2003 4:12:47 PM PST by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-43 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson