Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

NASA Press Conference Thread

Posted on 02/01/2003 10:14:13 AM PST by ksen

NASA Press conference any minute now....


TOPICS: Breaking News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: columbia; columbiatragedy; feb12003; nasa; spaceshuttle; sts107
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180 ... 241-258 next last
To: Bronco_Buster_FweetHyagh
The NASA rep went on to say that they don't have the capability to walk to the underside of the craft.
141 posted on 02/01/2003 1:48:31 PM PST by Tree of Liberty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 129 | View Replies]

To: mewzilla
mewzilla, totally agreed. This "well we couldnt fix it so why bother" line of responses is not helping this guy.

Sounds to me like he is feeling very guilty. His evasive responses, and broken logic is telling.

Does he really expect us to believe that they couldn't go out and look at the wing? Good grief.

I wonder, did the shuttle crew even get informed that a massive piece of insulation had broken off the launch tank and struck the left wing leading-edge?
142 posted on 02/01/2003 1:50:06 PM PST by Bronco_Buster_FweetHyagh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 139 | View Replies]

To: seamole
Well, we don't know, we, though I suspect the EVA would have ment losing stuff in the cargo bay since I think that was the only way to go out. Plus the robotic arm was not on board, so that would have made getting to the area difficult supposedly. But the point is NASA obviously didn't even consider the possibility an EVA could be needed for a damage assessment, or that a visual assessment might be useful. Very farsighted of them, wasn't it? NOT.
143 posted on 02/01/2003 1:50:44 PM PST by mewzilla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 138 | View Replies]

To: Bronco_Buster_FweetHyagh
You are incorrect. After the NASA rep said there was no means of doing repairs, the journalist then asked about just inspecting for damage. The NASA rep then said they cannot walk to the underside of the vehicle.
144 posted on 02/01/2003 1:51:39 PM PST by Tree of Liberty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 137 | View Replies]

To: Tree of Liberty
TOL, what I heard him say was that they didnt have the ability to space-walk under the ship AND REPAIR TILES.

That was totally non-responsive to the question.

Did Nasa consider a space-walk? He never said yes or no. I don't care if they can repair tiles or not. What I do care about is whether or not they adequately investigated the damage potentially caused during launch.

Does this guy think we are going to believe that the shuttle crew does not have the ability to put on a space-suit, and walk out to the wing to look at it?

145 posted on 02/01/2003 1:53:44 PM PST by Bronco_Buster_FweetHyagh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 141 | View Replies]

To: Tree of Liberty
Tree of Liberty writes
"You are incorrect. After the NASA rep said there was no means of doing repairs, the journalist then asked about just inspecting for damage. The NASA rep then said they cannot walk to the underside of the vehicle."


Do you believe him?

And by the way, the debris during launch struck the LEADING EDGE OF THE LEFT WING. Not the underside of the shuttle.
146 posted on 02/01/2003 1:54:54 PM PST by Bronco_Buster_FweetHyagh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 144 | View Replies]

To: Bronco_Buster_FweetHyagh
I agree the answer was not responsive. But, as way of excusing this, consider whether the person answering the question is at a level where all inquiries are answered in terms of what has been rehearsed; i.e., if they have never gone or planned for going below the wing to look, then that possibility is in fact not considered. Might not be prudent, but may in fact be true.

We'll probably know in due course.

147 posted on 02/01/2003 1:55:44 PM PST by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 129 | View Replies]

Comment #148 Removed by Moderator

To: Bronco_Buster_FweetHyagh
Do not know if this would be any help. From this web site. http://spaceflightnow.com/shuttle/sts107/030201columbia/launchincident.html
149 posted on 02/01/2003 2:00:48 PM PST by luv2ndamend
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 146 | View Replies]

To: Bronco_Buster_FweetHyagh
Do you believe him? I don't have enough facts at my disposal to make a judgment call in that regard. Contrary to your assertion, though, he did answer the question. However, I'm sure the veracity of the answer will be debated.
150 posted on 02/01/2003 2:01:12 PM PST by Tree of Liberty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 146 | View Replies]

To: ksen
bump
151 posted on 02/01/2003 2:02:19 PM PST by foreverfree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: snopercod
7:53 AM CDT we saw an indication of Offscale/Low temp msmts on left IB and OB Hydraulic systems and - and this was loss of temperature msmt - not an indication of high or low ...

7:56 In the left main gear tire wheel-well brake line and tire tempeatures - there we saw an increase.

I need to tell you that during this time the vehicle was performing fine.

We had no indication

7:58 We have what we call Bon-line tempeartures ... these are temp sensors embeded in the vehicle ... in left wing area ... these were Offscale/Low readings

7:59 Left IB and OB Tire temperatures and Pressures - Offscale/Low. Ahh ... about 8 msmts total during that time.

One of these msmts ... gave the crew a msg an indication that they could look at on their display, and they - we think that they were acknowlinging that message that htey saw ...


152 posted on 02/01/2003 2:02:48 PM PST by _Jim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies]

To: snopercod
Is it just me or does the guy giving the NASA briefing look like what Tom Dashole would look like if he had a pair?
153 posted on 02/01/2003 2:04:47 PM PST by bribriagain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies]

To: Bronco_Buster_FweetHyagh
Do you really think at this very moment in time should be likened to a deposition?

I am not an attorney, but truly find it sad to hear that you are suggesting this person is ignoring a smoking gun. If what you are suggesting is true then an immediate criminal investigation should be started.

I believe that this press conference should be stopped and all be ordered by their attorney to answer no more questions.

Do you really believe that these people willingly and knowlingly ignored something that allowed this to happen?



154 posted on 02/01/2003 2:04:51 PM PST by Just mythoughts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 129 | View Replies]

To: steveegg
Could you link to it? Thanks.

Off a local HD? ... maybe sometime in the future ...

155 posted on 02/01/2003 2:04:57 PM PST by _Jim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 132 | View Replies]

To: snopercod
Are there redundant sensors and wiring?
156 posted on 02/01/2003 2:06:53 PM PST by bribriagain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]

To: _Jim
Off scale meaning zero reading, a major concern. I have no doubt at least one of the crew knew something was terribly wrong, a few moments before the event......
157 posted on 02/01/2003 2:08:01 PM PST by Joe Hadenuf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 152 | View Replies]

To: Just mythoughts
It wouldn't be the first time someone in a government-funded program or agency skirted the truth in order to justify their mistakes, or to avoid negative fallout.

I don't know what he knows or doesn't know. All I know is what I heard in the press conference. And, as someone who has professional experience in Question and Answer sessions dealing with serious or touchy subjects, I'm just trying to offer my reaction to his response.

Noone asked him if tiles could be repaired. All that was asked was if Nasa had considered a spacewalk to investigate the impact that occurred during launch.

His answer was totally defensive. Between several of his responses, the "theme" was "Nothing could have been done to repair tile damage" - I don't believe that for a minute. Regardless, who cares if it couldn't have been repaired? That is NO justification for failing to fully investigate before re-entry.

158 posted on 02/01/2003 2:08:46 PM PST by Bronco_Buster_FweetHyagh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 154 | View Replies]

To: _Jim; snopercod
Looks like we both got it. Thanks, Jim.
159 posted on 02/01/2003 2:12:04 PM PST by steveegg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 152 | View Replies]

To: Just mythoughts
Do you really believe that these people willingly and knowlingly ignored something that allowed this to happen?

I am also an attorney and do not equate the press conference to a deposition. Depositions only ocur after there are allegations of fault or malfeasance.

That being said, it came to light after Challanger that NASA ignored indicators of problems with the seals and freezing temeratures. People do not often willingly put others lives at risk nut the sometimes do negligently and carelessly.

160 posted on 02/01/2003 2:13:37 PM PST by CharacterCounts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 154 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180 ... 241-258 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson