Skip to comments.
SUN TZU ON THE ART OF WAR
SUN TZU ON THE ART OF WAR ^
| 1910
| Translated by LIONEL GILES
Posted on 01/31/2003 4:22:06 PM PST by Alpha One
SUN TZU ON THE ART OF WAR
THE OLDEST MILITARY TREATISE IN THE WORLD
Translated from the Chinese with Introduction and Critical Notes
BY LIONEL GILES, M.A.
Assistant in the Department of Oriental Printed Books and MSS. in the British Museum
First Published in 1910
To my brother Captain Valentine Giles, R.G. in the hope that a work 2400 years old may yet contain lessons worth consideration by the soldier of today this translation is affectionately dedicated. This publication is based on an Etext version provided by the Project Gutenberg. Dr. Giles's commentaries are inluded for the benefit of those who are not familiar with the Ancient Chinese History (500 BC).
TOPICS: Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; Free Republic; Philosophy
KEYWORDS: suntzu
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-77 last
To: Clive
I would say that at least as integral to Roman "strategy" was basically a willingness to continue attritional warfare indefinitely. Hence Hannibal, despite technical and tactical superiority, was doomed to failure in the long run because mercenary armies will always lose attritional wars (it also didn't hurt that Hannibal never understood the difference between strategy and tactics, that all his brilliance at the latter would be worthless if he could not organize it into a decisive strategy). Hence the assorted barbarians, accustomed to short incursions, distribution of spoils, and withdrawal, could rarely withstand protracted campaigns, even when it was their own turf they were defending.
Aggressiveness is an interesting part of Roman history; it seems there was rarely a moment where continual expansion was not desired by their leadership.
To: ScholarWarrior
"FYI Sun Tzu is a primary text at the Army War College and West Point."
and the only text other than your rules and regulations and the bible that you are allowed in Marine Corps OCS...
To: Alpha One
Just a joke, and only about the interior decorating technique, not the military stragy principles.
To: Jeff Head
BTTT!
64
posted on
02/01/2003 11:06:53 AM PST
by
martian_22
(We're the New Galactic Order and nobody's sweet-heart.)
To: Travis McGee; Squantos
I agree...not the customary orifices...lol
My interests in the good old days of traveling the globe aside from girls, adventure, and money (in that order) never were too much into that salacious stuff. I loved women the world over but they could always leave their pets at home.
My partner did indeed have a brief liasion with a stripper snake dancer in Zurich's old town....he wasn't much on snakes so it was quite brief.
I do regret that I never perused the obvious bounties in the old East Bloc nations like Czech and Hungary in particular. Were I a young scoundrel now, that's where I'd head for sport....and Croatia and Lithuiania and Russia ....a veritable nirvanaland for young lad these days from what I glean. Alas...we're only in our 20s once....sigh.
Not to worry..mid 40s with Mrs Wardaddy sure ain't chopped liver...lol
Regards to both ya'll
65
posted on
02/01/2003 11:18:29 AM PST
by
wardaddy
(Honey....I'm only admitting these things cause Travis has a gun to my head...I swear)
To: wardaddy
Youth is wasted on the young. Now the best I can do is write tall tales.
66
posted on
02/01/2003 11:45:13 AM PST
by
Travis McGee
(----- www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com -----)
To: The Pheonix
I am curious how you can place the 1879 Battle of Isandlwana in the "1900"? It does not give you much credibility really.
67
posted on
02/01/2003 5:57:57 PM PST
by
KiaKaha
To: Alpha One
Col. John R. Boyd brought the art of war into the 21st century. He was truly a genius.
68
posted on
02/01/2003 6:03:36 PM PST
by
Malichi
To: The Pheonix
+Similarly, Hilter did NOT follow Sun Tzu and tried to fight on TWO FRONTS at one time, the Western Front and Eastern Front. And the Allied opened up yet a THIRD FRONT, the Southern front to teach the arrogant NAZIs a lesson or two+
If you'll recall, the whole purpose of German strategy from the first world war's Schlieffen plan (and long before that) was to avoid having such a war on two fronts. The error Hitler made was failing to take out Moscow directly and rather swerving towards Baku for the oil; the subsequent stalling gave the allies much needed breathing space (albeit at an unbelievable cost to the Soviets, which I am hard pressed to be torn up about).
If you think the "Southern Front", as you refer to it, was anything other than yet another futile manifestation of the British search for a "soft underbelly" rather than a direct strike, I would say that there is quite a bit of disagreement with your contention. It was a drain of manpower, rapidly stalled despite the best efforts of the Italians to collapse as soon as possible. If you mean North Africa, that was yet another call of questionable value.
Sun Tzu may have expounded on all this, but what you refer to in your post is less the domain of military philosophy and more that of military common sense. All the books in the world cannot teach that to a commander. I would also say that the British had much larger problems than the splitting of their army, although that was certainly a factor.
To: Poohbah
Did this guy get fragged? Because he sure does look like fragging material from here.
To: The Pheonix
The British had lots of machine-guns and modern weapons when they fought a famous battle against the half-naked primitive Zulus Warriors, armed only with spears and wooden clubs in South Africa, in the early 1900s. I'm not so sure about machine guns, but didn't someone figure out that the rifle the Brits were using was faulty and jammed after a few rounds. Good point on dividing forces.
To: I got the rope
Did this guy get fragged? Because he sure does look like fragging material from here.You mind telling me why a mathematician should get fragged?
72
posted on
02/02/2003 11:50:19 AM PST
by
Poohbah
(Beware the fury of a patient man -- John Dryden)
To: Alpha One
Thank for providing this. ;-)
To: Ff--150
Very good reading.It is an art, isn't it? Think about how it is being used against US, as a nation and for our beliefs.
;o)
74
posted on
02/03/2003 1:19:37 PM PST
by
4CJ
(Be nice to liberals, medicate them to the point of unconsciousness.)
To: 4ConservativeJustices
Gonna study up this art later. Getting x42's wife back in the Oral, I mean Oval, Office is so real. Gotta know their plans...?
75
posted on
02/03/2003 1:28:55 PM PST
by
Ff--150
Comment #76 Removed by Moderator
To: nutmeg
bookmark bump
77
posted on
02/03/2003 7:16:18 PM PST
by
nutmeg
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-77 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson