Posted on 01/31/2003 5:22:56 AM PST by SJackson
It may be the ultimate weight-loss plan.
No diet, no exercise, no surgery, no pills. Just a little digital wizardry. Point and click here, point and click there, and unwanted pounds melt magically away - from your photographed image, that is.
This is what the British edition of GQ magazine recently did, altering photographs of actress Kate Winslet - without her knowledge or permission, she says - to give her that svelte look common to heroin addicts and supermodels. Winslet has responded angrily. "This is me," she says. "Like it or lump it. ... I'm not a twig, and I refuse to be one. I'm happy with the way I am."
Let the church say amen.
Winslet, it should be pointed out, is not what we delicately describe as a "plus-size woman." She's just a woman with womanly curves, some of which she displayed quite openly in her star-making turn as Rose in "Titanic."
I wish I had a convenient theory for when and why womanly curves became a bad thing, wish I could explain our fascination with a kind of woman who does not, as a rule, exist in nature: Stick legs, sunken cheeks, waist in to here, chest out to there.
It was not always thus. I mean, by those standards, sex symbols of an earlier era would never have heard the first wolf whistle. Marilyn Monroe was not, after all, a beanpole. And that famous pinup of Betty Grable, which, we are told, inspired the GIs to go out and win World War II, did not show a woman who had missed many meals.
By contrast, a 1997 Psychology Today article reported on a researcher who had quantified the fact that Playboy centerfolds and Miss America contestants - purported icons of feminine physical perfection - had been getting skinnier over the years.
Our perception of beauty has changed. And if you're wondering why that matters, it's because our girls are watching. Watching and learning from all this how it is they should be. Much of what they have learned has proved dangerous if not deadly to body and spirit.
Approximately 5 million to 10 million women and girls (and 1 million boys and men) suffer from eating disorders - primarily anorexia and bulimia - which are sometimes fatal. That same Psychology Today recounted the results of a body image survey of 4,000 women and men. Almost 90 percent of the women wanted to lose weight.
Score one for pop culture. I mean, one of its primary functions is to make us dissatisfied with what we are, make us want what it is selling. Right now, it's selling the canard that the average supermodel's body is achievable or even desirable for the average girl. And girls are getting sick, even dying, as a result.
There are those feminists who would argue that the solution is for men to stop objectifying women, but their reasoning flies in the face of human nature. If somebody hadn't objectified somebody else, none of us would be here to argue about it. And anyone who doesn't think women fantasize about a masculine ideal has never seen a soap opera or romance novel.
I'm not out to stop - as if I could! - the endless mating dance of male and female. I'd just like to see something done to protect our girls and women from its more insidious effects.
(Excerpt) Read more at jewishworldreview.com ...
I have no problem with homosexuals or homosexuality. I'm merely making an observation about an obvious, observable fact: many clothes designers are homosexual men. Do you dispute that homosexual men are attracted to men, and that their design ideas might be skewed to what they're most attracted to?Or that the design ideas of this cadre of top-level NY designers influences clothes design everywhere? Or that it drives the high fashion industry, and thus fuels the high fashion media, or that women like to wear the latest, trendiest, nicest clothes?
Oh but I'm very much afraid that it is.
I caught an episode and was quite surprised to see two 'big' gals with 'big' voices doing quite well. They were confident, entertaining, and radiated their love of music and performing. I hope they continue to do well in the contest.
Kimberley Locke
and Frenchie Davis
But you're right. The lion's share of the contestants I saw in that episode were reflecting a rather unhealthy trend. Pop culture demands that hip men look and act weak and effeminate. Hip women be shaped like children, or boys, but be as agressive as a man (using the feminazi definition). I won't buy into it and don't mind issuing a bit of scorn to those who do.
Any society that thinks Marylin was fat is borderline insane. Marylin was, physically, absolute perfection.
While your statement is true, it is beside the point. The media crams the heroin-junky look down America's throat every day. It is thus romanticized as the ideal look to which all females should aspire. Perfectly healthy and attractive little girls look into mirrors and fret that they are "too fat," and have to "go on a diet," so they can look more like the anorexic bulemics on TV, movies or in magazines.
That is unhealthy and also unattractive.
And absolutely breathtaking. I think that's the point.
She says she can tell a homosexual a mile away because he is impeccably groomed, his hair is perfect and his clothes are trendy and fashionable. Her implication is that if a man looks good to her, he must be gay.
I've got a T-shirt that says "By the time I am thin, fat will be in", LOL!
A rich, thin person.
That is my only point, and I believe it is inarguable.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.