Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

I watch my son die every time I see the twin towers on TV
The Daily Telegraph ^ | January 31, 2003 | Kate Connolly

Posted on 01/30/2003 5:46:26 PM PST by MadIvan

Relatives of September 11 victims wept yesterday as for the first time they confronted an alleged plotter, frequently breaking down and sometimes shouting as they delivered emotional testimony to a Hamburg court.

A bereaved husband, two widows, a mother and a father who are among 20 co-plaintiffs in the first September 11 trial spelt out the horrendous impact the attacks had had on their lives.

On trial is Mounir el Motassadeq, 28, a Moroccan student accused of acting as a logistician for the Hamburg-based gang that planned the attack and of assisting in the murders of 3,045 people.

"We wanted to present the faces of the victims and their families today so that they're not just statistics," said Maureen Fanning, who lost her fireman husband Jack, 54, when the World Trade Centre collapsed. Mrs Fanning told the court his death had forced her to place one of their two severely autistic sons into a care home.

"Sean and Patrick have very little in their lives. They can't read or write. They have no friends to ring the doorbell. They had Jack to walk in the door and smile at them, something special. That was stolen from them on 9/11."

Mrs Fanning said the only possession of her husband's recovered was his helmet. Joan Molinaro, who lost her fireman son Carl, 32, reduced many in the court to tears, including the interpreter, when she described how she was haunted by the images of the plane attacks.

"I have watched my son die 100 times, every time I see videotapes of the towers falling," she said through tears. When I watch, I lean towards the TV and my mind screams: 'Carl run, run, run. This time you'll make it out'. I look at the faces of the people coming out but his face is never there."

Deena Burnett, whose 38-year-old husband Thomas was on United Airlines flight 93 which crashed in a field in Pennsylvania, looked directly at Motassadeq as she told how her three young daughters had yet to comprehend fully their father's loss.

"I hear them talk to their Dad at night by whispering prayers. They stuff crayon drawings into helium balloons and watch in the childlike hope that angels will carry them to Tom."

Michael Low, whose daughter Sarah, 29, was a flight attendant on American Airlines 11, which was rammed into the north tower, said all that had been recovered of his daughter were small bone fragments and two rings.

The impact of her loss meant "I'll never get to walk her down the aisle or to experience the joy of her first child".

As he spoke, Motassadeq, in a grey shirt, listened attentively, sometimes resting his chin in his left hand or clutching his beard. The co-plaintiffs are being led by Stephen Push, whose wife Lisa Raines, 42, a lobbyist for the pharmaceutical industry, was on board the plane that hit the Pentagon.

Since her death, his life "has had no joy in it" and he was constantly bombarded with reminders of the attacks.

"A sunny day reminds me that the hijackers selected a cloudless day better to see their targets at a distance," he said. "The mere sight of a commercial plane gives me a sick feeling in my stomach."

Mr Push, who founded the Families of September 11 organisation, said he had received his wife's body parts in a sealed coffin as well as a bent anniversary ring and half a burnt credit card.

Motassadeq, who denies the charges, dropped his gaze as Mrs Fanning delivered an angry outburst. "The defendant has chosen to associate himself with the forces of evil.

"Under the guise of religion, he has submitted himself freely and voluntarily to be educated and brainwashed in hatred and murder," she said, calling for a sentence of life imprisonment.

The trial continues.


TOPICS: Extended News; Foreign Affairs; Germany; Government; News/Current Events; US: District of Columbia; US: New York; United Kingdom
KEYWORDS: 911; alqaeda; attack; binladen; september11; trial; wtc
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081 next last
To: OldFriend
You sound like the typical dem, or are you a defense attorney. Either way, you have my sympathies......it must be hard to live without a heart......or brain cells. No the right to a fair trial is many centuries old. Only in the media age has such nonsense been added to the trials. Have a fair trial and then hang'em when they are found guilty.
21 posted on 01/30/2003 6:26:14 PM PST by GermanBabies
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan
Never Forget! Never Forget!


22 posted on 01/30/2003 6:29:22 PM PST by geedee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibKill
yes it is ... when I did those pages (there is a similar one on the site but with a slightly different image from the artist ... this one here is his second version) I wanted something to be touching and respectful ... an airline passenger/crewmember or a policeman or an office worker or pedestrian would be appropriate too ... I found the angel on the firefighter a proper summation of the terrible grief that befell so many on that day ... God rest their souls ...
23 posted on 01/30/2003 6:29:51 PM PST by Bobby777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: dagnabbit
He will be avenged.

Don't count on it.

Patience, FRiend.

The Al Queda was first on the list.

Paid.

Saddam is next on the list.

In WWII this country had to make nice with the kommies. Later, Ronald the Great put them out of business, now the former kommunist nations of the Soviet bloc are either on our side (Poland) or they are on the sidelines.

We will fix the Saudis later.

Take the long view. America is not only the most powerful nation since Rome, we are also spreading FReedom. FReedom is a seed that will take root in the toughest, stoniest soil and will still bring in a bountiful harvest.

24 posted on 01/30/2003 6:30:37 PM PST by LibKill (ColdWarrior. I stood the watch.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: caisson71
"I wonder if we can get these same people to testify before the US Senate as to the liberals question of a "smoking gun".

I agree with you. What greater proof do people need of a "smoking gun" than September 11, 2001 when over 3,000 of our innocent citizens were slaughtered? I think that is over 3000 "smoking guns".

25 posted on 01/30/2003 6:31:12 PM PST by harpo11 (I Proudly Stand With My President and America's Brave Troops--God Bless)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan
American relatives are at this trial. Is their government?

U.S., Saudis not helping in 9/11 suspect's trial, Germans say
New York Times / Minneapolis Star Tribune ^ | 8 Dec 2002 | By DESMOND BUTLER

Posted on 12/11/2002 9:41 PM EST by dagnabbit

BERLIN -- German authorities investigating a Moroccan man on trial on charges that he was involved in the Sept. 11 attacks in the United States say there is evidence that he had contact with a Saudi diplomat as well as the leaders of an extremist group in Saudi Arabia.

But despite their requests for help following up on these leads, German officials said, responses had not been forthcoming from U.S. or Saudi authorities.

In Washington, a Justice Department spokesman named called questions about the German authorities' requests "too sensitive" for comment.
Excerpted - click for full article ^
Source: http://www.startribune.com/stories/484/3482399.html


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Extended News; Foreign Affairs; Germany; Government; Click to Add Topic
KEYWORDS: 911; GERMAN; GERMANY; HEARING; SAUDI; <a
26 posted on 01/30/2003 6:32:54 PM PST by dagnabbit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OldFriend
Aren't all defense atty's Dems by default?
27 posted on 01/30/2003 6:33:21 PM PST by FBD (Pleaze pardun my speling; I brok my spel cheker with a hamer.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: LibKill
One more I just found...


28 posted on 01/30/2003 6:33:40 PM PST by geedee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: geedee
That's good. You brought tears to these old cynical eyes.
29 posted on 01/30/2003 6:38:55 PM PST by LibKill (ColdWarrior. I stood the watch.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan
Poor people. But they are wasting their time attempting to make terrorists realize what they have done.
30 posted on 01/30/2003 6:43:48 PM PST by wizardoz (Bomb Hollywood!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan
Greetings MadIvan, FReepers, et al:
Perhaps Mr. Mounir el Motassadeq should watch this little clip each day before appearing in court?

Just listening to the music brings tears to my eyes.

31 posted on 01/30/2003 6:51:16 PM PST by OneLoyalAmerican ( Iraq has not accounted for 20,000,000 envelopes worth of weaponized anthrax.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #32 Removed by Moderator

To: LibKill
Libkill, thanks for standing watch during the Cold War. I grew up during the Cold War--free. Thanks.
33 posted on 01/30/2003 7:02:14 PM PST by exit82
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: mvpel
Actually, it is an entirely relevant and sometimes critical step in a trial. A typical part of the defense's "strategy" is to deflect attention as much as possible from the murder victim's identity, dignity and worth as a person. The more the defense can make the jury feel like they are actually hearing about a "parking ticket" versus a life snuffed out, the better chance they have at gaining sympathy for their client's stated "defense" story.

It will continue this way as long as courts use an "adversarial" attorney system where a jury is presented to two opposite versions of "truth" regarding an event and expect the poor jurists to expertly navigate all the smoke and mirrors - unless the American Bar Association starts actually putting it's money where it's mouth is and strictly enforces an ethics code that outlaws any attorney from blatantly lying in a courtroom. Everyone else in court is subject to severe penalties for any type of knowing falsehood or deceit.... except the defense attorney (who are sworn officers of the court in the U.S.A).

And that's why you have to "humanize" the murder victim during a trial....

Tammy
34 posted on 01/30/2003 7:09:10 PM PST by Tamzee (Listening to Dems requires a turntable)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: exit82
Libkill, thanks for standing watch during the Cold War. I grew up during the Cold War--free. Thanks.

You are very welcome.

I, myself, give thanks to the WWII generation. They are leaving us now, soon there will be none left. If you know a WWII veteran, please visit him (or her) and thank them for saving the world.

Also, I pay homage to the Korean Veterans, and (never forget) the VietNam veterans. Last, but not least, the Gulf War Veterans.

Standing the watch was good and neccesary, but compared to the sacrifices of these warriors it was a walk in Disneyland.

I did see some combat in dockside bars. Usually when some (censored) made a derogatory comment about the USA.

I always won. And I'm a little-bitty Marine.

35 posted on 01/30/2003 7:12:49 PM PST by LibKill (ColdWarrior. I stood the watch.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: LibKill
I don't share your optimism, but I'd love to be proven wrong by some real justice in the 9-11 case. The capture, and Nuremberg-like trial of all the Saudi officials, "diplomats", "charity" heads and others directly linked to the 9-11 hijackers or to the rest of al-Qaeda would be good. Driving our armed forces South after Iraq would be better.
36 posted on 01/30/2003 7:13:58 PM PST by dagnabbit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

Comment #37 Removed by Moderator

To: dagnabbit
Patience FRiend.

The awful truth is that we need their oil to drive our civillisation.

What is true today may well not be true tomorrow.

If my optomism is right there will come a day when we don't need these (censored) or their oil.

If, in the long run, we still need their oil, we will be in a very good position to dictate terms of contract.

They'll get what is coming to them. No Fear.

38 posted on 01/30/2003 7:20:48 PM PST by LibKill (ColdWarrior. I stood the watch.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: AllSmiles
We can't bring back the dead. We can't bring back the towers. But we can Rock the muslim world!

I applaud your fighting spirit.

You are mistaken on one little detail.

We can rebuild the towers. We can rebuild them taller than before.

This would be the ultimate "F--- YOU!" to our enemies.

We must never give in, never bow down.

39 posted on 01/30/2003 7:25:16 PM PST by LibKill (ColdWarrior. I stood the watch.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: LibKill
Libkill, there's no such thing as a little-bitty Marine;)

You're right about the WW2 vets. I live in central NJ, by the Shore--we have the third largest group of retirees in the country.

My three kids are grown now, but I told them never to make fun of the many seniors around us. I told them you don't know their story--some of these bent over men were some of our country's biggest heroes.

The all had a history teacher that had the seniors come in and talk about their real life experiences in WW2. For some, it was the first time they ever told their story. The kids were amazed every time.

I saw an elderly couple in an informal restaurant a few years back. He had on a cap saying "USS Franklin". As he left, I got up, and approached them and said to the man--thank you for serving on the Franklin, fighting off the kamikazis, and for bringing her back to the United States(1945). His eyes teared up and he shook my hand, and so did his wife, who proceeded to tell me how she anxiously waited for his return after learning of the attack.

These are men, like you, who served all of us and gave us a legacy of freedom. May we be able to keep it.
40 posted on 01/30/2003 7:26:18 PM PST by exit82
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson