Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Al-Qaeda made 'dirty bomb' (in Afghanistan with help from the Taliban)
The Daily Telegraph ^ | January 31 2003

Posted on 01/30/2003 4:33:53 PM PST by knighthawk

OSAMA bin Laden's al-Qaeda terrorist network successfully built a crude radiological device known as a "dirty bomb" in Afghanistan, the British Broadcasting Corp has reported.

British intelligence agents infiltrated the network and learned that terrorists had built the device near Herat in western Afghanistan, the BBC said, citing unidentified British government officials.

Britain's Foreign Office said today the report substantiated expert opinion that al-Qaeda wanted to develop a nuclear weapon.

"The evidence presented in the BBC report speaks for itself," a spokesman said.

"It provides proof to substantiate expert opinion that al-Qaeda was interested in developing nuclear weapons."

According to the BBC, the Taliban regime helped al-Qaeda construct the device, which has not been recovered, by providing medical isotopes.

There has been previous evidence of al-Qaeda's interest in developing a "dirty bomb" - a conventional bomb that would scatter radioactive material. Such a radiological weapon would be far less deadly and damaging than a nuclear explosion.

Computers found by journalists and US troops at a variety of facilities in Afghanistan indicated al-Qaeda had sought to obtain and develop nuclear and other potent weapons.

During a New York trial two years ago stemming from bombings at two US embassies in Africa, a former bin Laden aide testified he was ordered in 1993 to try to buy uranium on the black market for an effort to develop a nuclear weapon. Jamal Ahmed Al-Fadl said al-Qaeda was prepared to spend $US1.5 million ($2.5 million), but he did not know if a purchase was made.

In addition, US officials have said captured al-Qaeda lieutenant Abu Zubaydah told American interrogators the terrorist network was working on a "dirty bomb".

Authorities also have said that Jose Padilla, the former Chicago gang member charged with plotting with al-Qaeda, attended two meetings in Karachi, Pakistan, at which senior al-Qaeda operatives discussed the possible use of a "dirty bomb".

A United Nations report issued by experts monitoring al-Qaeda movements warned that al-Qaeda has the potential to obtain nuclear material and build "some kind of dirty bomb".

The BBC said documents discovered by the intelligence agents were sent to the British Government's weapons research facility in Porton Down, southern England. Scientists concluded al-Qaeda had constructed a small "dirty bomb", not a full-blown nuclear device.

In November the British Government issued - and then hurriedly withdrew - a statement warning that al-Qaeda might be prepared to use a "dirty bomb", or some kind of poison gas. It was replaced with a more general warning of terrorist threats.


TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: afghanistan; alqaeda; alqaida; bbc; dirtybomb; oef; southasialist; taliban; talibanlist; terrorwar
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-128 next last
To: PhiKapMom
And who supplied the Taliban would be my question

,,, let's spin the bottle and see if it points to the Ukraine.

41 posted on 01/30/2003 5:29:51 PM PST by shaggy eel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: cmsgop
It's like all of a sudden the Dems want to be Americans..........LOL!!!!!

Boy didn't they seem to be in shock .. like a light bulb finally was turned on ..

IMO it was only because there were camera's in the room .. by hey what do I know

42 posted on 01/30/2003 5:30:28 PM PST by Mo1 (I Hate The Party of Bill Clinton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: shaggy eel
Maybe rogue elements in Ukraine...I doubt such a thing would be Ukrainian national policy.
43 posted on 01/30/2003 5:30:43 PM PST by Petronski (...he asks rhetorically.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: steveegg
No more hajj

It's symbolic anyway. They'll just keep right on with or without the rock. Won't make any difference at all.

44 posted on 01/30/2003 5:31:08 PM PST by RightWhale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
Yep, him and Biden and a few others acted like they had no idea this was happening

I guess we know who hasn't been showing up for all the meetings huh??
45 posted on 01/30/2003 5:32:49 PM PST by Mo1 (I Hate The Party of Bill Clinton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Petronski
I doubt such a thing would be Ukrainian national policy.

,,, the only policy there is everything's for sale.

46 posted on 01/30/2003 5:33:14 PM PST by shaggy eel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Dog
Days? Bush said that the diplomatic process has weeks, not months, to work.

My guess is about 3 weeks....say Feb. 21st.

47 posted on 01/30/2003 5:34:03 PM PST by HardStarboard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Petronski
Powell will speak.....on the 5th....President will speak to the nation...on the 7th.......then...
48 posted on 01/30/2003 5:35:31 PM PST by Dog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale
It's symbolic anyway. They'll just keep right on with or without the rock. Won't make any difference at all.

I don't pretend to know the inner mind of the average Islamist, so I can't fully evaluate the accuracy of that statement. There is a competing school of thought that symbolism is extremely important, which is supported by the hajj and the fact that the 5-times-a-day prayer sessions involve facing Mecca.

What I do know after studying wars that involve fanatics is that if you can sufficiently shock them (either through killing a sufficient number in a sufficiently-horrific method or through destroying everything they think is sacred spectacularily), they will lose the fanaticism. Why did Japan fold after 2 nukes, while it took Allies crawling over virtually every square inch of Germany to get the Nazis to quit?

49 posted on 01/30/2003 5:38:44 PM PST by steveegg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: HardStarboard
Not that long....Saddam is pushing for Blix to visit Baghdad on Feb 10th.....so he kick the can down the street for a couple of months....his survival is at stake..

We will move before that date. This invasion will be launched from a running start.....we can't afford to wait any longer....and risk a strike by Saddam or AQ on our forces.

50 posted on 01/30/2003 5:40:14 PM PST by Dog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: shaggy eel
Sure is beginning to make sense that some of these countries are really nervous about what we are going to find when we go into Iraq and what we are finding in Afghanistan.
51 posted on 01/30/2003 5:40:38 PM PST by PhiKapMom (Bush/Cheney 2004)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: PhiKapMom
Explains why Patches Kennedy after viewing the evidence yesterday....sided with Bush about taking out Saddam.

Something is causing all these RATS to run for cover and tonight I think we know what it is...

52 posted on 01/30/2003 5:44:31 PM PST by Dog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: milestogo

Hmmmm...M-S-F G-C-T 'N'...what could this mean? How about:

'Multinational Special Forces Gonna Crush Towel-head Neandertalers'... or 'Muslim Sheep Fornicators Group of Cowardly Terrorists in Near-east'... or 'My Special Fetish - Grabbing Camel Testicles at Night'

Any suggestions?

53 posted on 01/30/2003 5:44:57 PM PST by struwwelpeter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: steveegg
Consider this: Alqaida struck the WTC and the Pentagon and attempted some other targets because they believed that the West considered these to be important symbols. Muslims don't hold much stock in external symbols, but they thought we did. They were highly dissappointed when the West didn't collapse as the symbols did. Turns out we don't have sacred icons any more than they do. They and we don't dabble in idol worship.

What do you think?

54 posted on 01/30/2003 5:49:48 PM PST by RightWhale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Mo1
My FR bet date has been February 14, Valentine's Day.
55 posted on 01/30/2003 5:54:47 PM PST by Gracey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Dog
It is getting funnier and funnier to watch them jump Ms. Clinton's/Daschle's/Pelosi's sinking ship!
56 posted on 01/30/2003 5:58:03 PM PST by PhiKapMom (Bush/Cheney 2004)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Dog
Explains why Patches Kennedy after viewing the evidence yesterday....sided with Bush about taking out Saddam.

He did?? .. Does Teddy know??

I know none of this is funny but it is interesting how the Rats are running

57 posted on 01/30/2003 5:59:01 PM PST by Mo1 (I Hate The Party of Bill Clinton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Gracey


Mine is Feb 13 We will be close.
58 posted on 01/30/2003 5:59:29 PM PST by woodyinscc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: Mo1
Fox and Friends talked about it this morning.
59 posted on 01/30/2003 6:00:00 PM PST by Dog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: PhiKapMom
Speaking of Hilda .. I haven't heard squat from her

What's she been up to and where is Bill??
60 posted on 01/30/2003 6:04:27 PM PST by Mo1 (I Hate The Party of Bill Clinton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-128 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson