To: Blood of Tyrants
So what if he is a liberal and an anti-Christian (which you have no proof of). He's a scientist who has to vouch for future scientists. That's the only criterion here.
7 posted on
01/30/2003 9:46:30 AM PST by
stanz
To: stanz
The vast majority of medical doctors are not so much as "scientists" as mechanics for the human body. You study the symptoms, make test measurements, come up with possible diagnoses, select the most probably, and then treat accordingly.
AGAIN: Why is the belief in evolution necessary to be a doctor? Humans are not going to evolve in the doctor's lifetime and he won't be required to treat a "pre-human".
10 posted on
01/30/2003 9:51:34 AM PST by
Blood of Tyrants
(Even if the government took all your earnings, you wouldn’t be, in its eyes, a slave)
To: stanz
P.S. He states the case for the "evolution" of bacteria to become anti-biotic resistant. This evolution has been proven to be untrue. Specific bacteria strains have ALWAYS been resistant to antibiotics. It is now that we are finding that the "weak" bacteria were killed off long ago in industrialized countries. In third world countries where people rarely get medical attention, penicillin and streptomycin work fine on infections.
22 posted on
01/30/2003 9:58:00 AM PST by
Blood of Tyrants
(Even if the government took all your earnings, you wouldn’t be, in its eyes, a slave)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson