To: stanz
The vast majority of medical doctors are not so much as "scientists" as mechanics for the human body. You study the symptoms, make test measurements, come up with possible diagnoses, select the most probably, and then treat accordingly.
AGAIN: Why is the belief in evolution necessary to be a doctor? Humans are not going to evolve in the doctor's lifetime and he won't be required to treat a "pre-human".
10 posted on
01/30/2003 9:51:34 AM PST by
Blood of Tyrants
(Even if the government took all your earnings, you wouldn’t be, in its eyes, a slave)
To: Blood of Tyrants
Well there is the whole problem of how bacteria cultures reproduce quickly enough to 'evolve' in a matter of months. Someone who understands the selective pressure created on bacteria when antibiotics are introduced into their environment might be more likely to administer them responsibly.
13 posted on
01/30/2003 9:54:38 AM PST by
Dimensio
To: Blood of Tyrants
He finds it necessary I suppose because he espouses this view and feels that anyone seeking his recommendation should be in agreement. Why would he want to recommend someone who would be at odds with evolution which is a biological discipline?
15 posted on
01/30/2003 9:54:52 AM PST by
stanz
To: Blood of Tyrants
Humans may not evolve over the doctor's lifetime, but their diseases will.
79 posted on
01/30/2003 11:07:55 AM PST by
Doctor Stochastic
(The world is a solemn place, with room for tennis. - John Berryman)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson