[Dimensio]

It's the evolutionists who have rejected science.

When in doubt, rely on intellectually bankrupt arguments like 'evolution is not science'.

[Schnucki]

When in doubt, rely on intellectually bankrupt arguments like 'evolution is not science'.

I'm talking about macro evolution: I don't know of any scientists who have a problem with micro evolution. I don't know any religious folks who might have a problem with this either.

However, macro evolution is proveably a complete crock.

[Dataman]

When in doubt, rely on intellectually bankrupt arguments like 'evolution is not science'.

Let's define science: 1. The observation, identification, description, experimental investigation, and theoretical explanation of natural phenomena.

What is observable about

the big bang
the beginning of time
the evolution of elements
the spontaneous generation of life from non-life
the suspension of the law of biogenesis
the evolution of plant to animal
the evolution of animal to man?