[Dataman]

When in doubt, rely on intellectually bankrupt arguments like 'evolution is not science'.

Let's define science: 1. The observation, identification, description, experimental investigation, and theoretical explanation of natural phenomena.

What is observable about

the big bang
the beginning of time
the evolution of elements
the spontaneous generation of life from non-life
the suspension of the law of biogenesis
the evolution of plant to animal
the evolution of animal to man?

[Dimensio]

What is observable about
the big bang

Remnants, evidence.

the beginning of time

I'm not aware of any leading scientific theories on "the beginning of time". In fact, from what I've seen most scientific principles break down once you get into Plank time, and as such there's no way to discern what happened 'before' that, much less whether or not there was a 'beginning'.

the beginning of time the evolution of elements

I'm not quite sure what you mean by this.

the spontaneous generation of life from non-life

Life is made up of various chemicals, all of which occur in nature. Unless life has existence since the beginning of the universe, it is logical to assume that at some point a collection of chemicals that were 'non-life' came together somehow in a fashion that made them 'life'. It is true that no one has managed to cause 'non-life' to form into 'life', but that's partly why speculation on abiogenesis is hypothesis, not theory.

the suspension of the law of biogenesis

What is the "law of biogenesis"?

the evolution of plant to animal
the evolution of animal to man?

I'm not aware that current theory has plants evolving into animals. I was under the impression that plants and animals were two different offshoots from more 'primitive' forms. As for man from animal....man is an animal!