War-torn Democrats (If this is not treason, then treason has no meaning) ANN COULTER

worldnetdaily ^ | 1/28/2003 | Ann Coulter

[TLBSHOW]

The excitement was noticeably muted on the Democrats' side of the aisle. The vast majority of Democrats remained firmly in their seats, sullen at the thought that America would be protected from incoming ballistic missiles. To paraphrase George Bush: If this is not treason, then treason has no meaning.

Ann Coulter

[BreitbartSentMe]

You GO girl!!

[Jay D. Dyson]

God Bless Ann Coulter! She always has a way of hitting the nail smack on the head.

(FYI to those who haven't read her book "Slander" yet, go out and buy or borrow it at once. Fantastic work on exposing the lies of the Left.)

-Jay

[ThinkDifferent]

Either we're removing a dictator who currently has plans to fund terrorism against American citizens or – if Bush is completely wrong and Eleanor Clift is completely right – we're just removing a dictator who plans to terrorize a lot of people in the region, but not Americans specifically.

Outstanding point. Even if Saddam really has no WMD (hah), removing him is even more justifiable on humanitarian grounds than Clinton's attack on Serbia.

[lainie]

Coulter is Right.

Hedgecock today talked a little about the League of Nations and its inability to stop the Japanese, Hitler, etc. and so on.

[AnnaZ]

As Bush said, after detailing some of Saddam Hussein's charming practices: "If this is not evil, then evil has no meaning." It's not as if anyone is worried that we're making a horrible miscalculation and could be removing the Iraqi Abraham Lincoln by mistake.

 

BWAHAHAHAHA!!!

[IronJack]

Eleanor Clift is completely right

I read the words, but they have no meaning. "Eleanor Clift" and "right." Hmmmmm. I suppose it COULD happen. Stopped clock and all that ...

[copycat]

So good I read it twice...

[facedown]

Joe Biden made the terrific argument that if we don't wait for U.N. approval, it would "make a mockery of the efficacy of the U.N."

Ummm...I think they do a pretty good job of that all by themselves.

[exit82]

A brilliant treatise. I have to put my sunglasses on to read her column.

Democrats--the party of treason. Has a nice ring to it.

[cactusSharp]

you can say all you want of her looks but for me, I could read a dozen Ann Coulter's to one Peggy Noonan's piece

[cricket]

"If this is not evil, then evil has no meaning."

. . .great line and truth expressed by GW and one that confounds the Libs who are unable to define, distinguish or discern 'Evil'.

[Mr. Mulliner]

Last year in the SOTU address the president used the phrase "axis of evil" and was laughed at by liberals. It later turned out that he used that phrase much more knowingly than anyone really gave him credit for, I think.

This year he used this phrase: "If this is not evil, then evil has no meaning." It seems like a rhetorical advice, kind of like that "axis of evil" thing last year. But you know what? This really gets very close to the way that liberals think: nothing is evil, nothing is good, it's all relative.

[jammer]

Good column. You know that I have been extremely skeptical about the invasion of Iraq. However, my view is rapidly changing. Why? Not due to the efforts/words of the Administration, but due to the lack of any coherence by the opposition. Hell, if there is not better reason for skepticism than they can offer, let's roll.

[Wphile]

She's right on target here. The dems are trying to have it both ways. Ted Kennedy wants a new vote on military action in Iraq. I say let them do it. Let the dems vote against it. Fine. Then, at least their true colors will show through.

At this point, they are all equivacating like mad (except for Zell Miller, Joe Lieberman, and perhaps some others) and look ridiculous. They didn't know what they voted for? Sheesh...who elected these morons? If they have to vote, up or down, then it will be on the record. They only voted for it last fall because of the elections. Daschle keeps raising the bar because he really is just plain against it but doesn't have the cajones to come out and say it.

I swear the democrats are such a bunch of panty-assed wimps.

[ThinkDifferent]

However, my view is rapidly changing. Why? Not due to the efforts/words of the Administration, but due to the lack of any coherence by the opposition.

My sentiments exactly. The "arguments" of the opposition are that they hate Bush, America, and/or capitalism.

[Martin Tell]

Kerry looked terrible last night. Even more Lurch-like than usual. I can't believe he will last long in the presidential primaries. God forbid he ever makes it to the presidency. Can you imagine having to look at the sour long face every night on the news!