Skip to comments.
INSPECTOR, HEAL THYSELF (Ritter)
New York Post ^
| 1/21/03
Posted on 01/21/2003 1:11:16 AM PST by kattracks
Edited on 05/26/2004 5:11:16 PM PDT by Jim Robinson.
[history]
January 21, 2003 -- Former U.N. weapons inspector Scott Ritter has been all over the news lately, defending Saddam Hussein against the Bush administration's accusations that he's harboring weapons of mass destruction.
Once Iraq's strongest critic, Ritter in recent years has come to regard America as "the arrogant international bully" - and never passes up a media opportunity to say so.
(Excerpt) Read more at nypost.com ...
TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Editorial; Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
1
posted on
01/21/2003 1:11:16 AM PST
by
kattracks
To: kattracks
Maybe Scott was to be paid $400,000 and 70 pre-adult female children by Iraq. How do we know that is not true now?
2
posted on
01/21/2003 1:28:56 AM PST
by
A CA Guy
To: kattracks
Thanks, that answers my question.
The $400,000 that an "Iraqi businessman" paid Ritter for making a "documentary film" was just a smokescreen.
Jailbait. Waiting in a wrapper with bows at Baghdad Airport, any time Scottieboy stops by to pay the Great Leader a visit.
My guess at Ritter's chatroom handle?
motherofpigtails
3
posted on
01/21/2003 1:31:46 AM PST
by
tictoc
To: kattracks
Much more dirt to come, no doubt, only to be covered up by the leftist media. Will they really have the gall to keep parading him around in support of Saddam? Or, will Ritter slink off quietly somewhere? Stay tuned...
Today's News
To: Types_with_Fist
5
posted on
01/21/2003 2:11:38 AM PST
by
kattracks
To: kattracks
6
posted on
01/21/2003 2:13:23 AM PST
by
MadIvan
To: Molly Pitcher; Mia T
Scott Ritter was arrested??
Isn't there's a current inspector with a similar sex problem?
7
posted on
01/21/2003 2:30:48 AM PST
by
The Raven
(Quiz (5 pts) : Name the countries implementing Socialism without mass murders)
To: kattracks
"you must have the wrong person."With "intelligence" officers like this, it's a wonder the Marines are even still in existence. What an idiot.
8
posted on
01/21/2003 3:11:59 AM PST
by
Bonaparte
To: kattracks
That's a pretty full report. Obviously the NY Post has been lurking here.
9
posted on
01/21/2003 3:16:18 AM PST
by
dennisw
(http://www.littlegreenfootballs.com/weblog/weblog.php)
To: kattracks
BTTT
To: The Raven
Yes. Such people used to be screened for sensitive jobs, because of the vulnerability to blackmail. Guess it doesn't matter anymore....
11
posted on
01/21/2003 5:22:16 AM PST
by
Molly Pitcher
(Demolish the Criminal Party!! NOW!!)
To: kattracks
HAHAHA! SR is now qualified to run for office ala bill clinton style, just needs a good dem base in the area he'll be in like flynn. i wonder if they are recruiting him already...
12
posted on
01/21/2003 5:25:43 AM PST
by
libbylu
To: kattracks
To: Molly Pitcher
I've been thinking the same thing---adverse information. For the close to eight years I had a security clearance (all during the Cold War), adverse information was a constant carrot/stick routine for keeping or losing a clearance. The carrot was keeping the clearance because of coming totally clean on adverse information, while the stick was losing it if adverse information was discovered (before you were blackmailed with it, of course). The joke on coming clean was that usually adverse information was grounds for not keeping a clearance in the first place, so it was blackmail of a different sort---tell us or lose it, okay you told us, the other side can't blackmail you now, but we don't like what you told us, so you still lose it.
In any event, I guess adverse information went away with the Soviets because there seem to be an awful lot of people out there with sensitive access who have adverse information by the boatload. The members of Congress whom the Klintoons have by the FBI file short hairs and Ritter being prime examples.
14
posted on
01/21/2003 8:44:19 AM PST
by
Dahoser
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson