Skip to comments.
Ritter's Attorney says "No Comment"
Capital News 9 ^
Posted on 01/20/2003 6:38:25 AM PST by per loin
Articles report dismissed charges
Updated: 1/20/2003 8:17 AM
By: Capital News 9 web staff
Two newspapers reported over the weekend that former UN weapons inspector and Delmar resident Scott Ritter was arrested for a Class B misdemeanor, but that the details of the case were sealed, after proceedings in Colonie Town Court.
The Schenectady Gazette and the Daily News report that the 41-year-old Ritter was arrested in June of 2001, and as a result of the handling of the case, a veteran Albany County assistant district attorney was fired.
District Attorney Paul Clyne told the Gazette he was quote "shocked and angered" when he learned that Assistant DA Cynthia Preiser had not told him about the case, in apparent violation of office policy, that he be informed about sensitive cases.
The newspapers report that Ritter was given what is called an adjournment in contemplation of dismissal, and entered no pleas in the case in Colonie Town Court, and that all records of the incident were sealed.
Details of the nature of the arrest were also sealed.
Ritter's attorney, Nora Murphy has declined to comment on the case. We attempted to contact Ritter at his house in Delmar.
An individual at his home said Ritter was out of town and would have no comment on the case.
We also attempted to contact former Assistant District Attorney Cynthia Preiser at home, and an individual on the phone told us they had no comment.
The Gazette reports that Ritter said Friday he had no knowledge of the arrest. Ritter has been a prominent commentator on national news networks and here on Capital News 9.
As a former UN weapons inspector in Iraq he has gained prominence recently for his outspoken opposition to Bush Administration policies in Iraq.
TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21 next last
1
posted on
01/20/2003 6:38:26 AM PST
by
per loin
To: per loin
what!? ritter's attorney doesn't echo the "mistaken identity" defense that scott used?
2
posted on
01/20/2003 6:41:48 AM PST
by
debg
To: per loin
An individual at his home said Ritter was out of town and would have no comment on the caseIn the old days a shamed woman would enter a convent and devote the remainder of her life to God. Maybe Scotty has entered the priesthood.
3
posted on
01/20/2003 6:45:15 AM PST
by
putupon
To: per loin
Maybe Ritter was set up in an Iraqi honeypot sting?
To: per loin
So how about the ADA? Who's investigating her? Because it sure as heck sounds as though someone ought to be...
5
posted on
01/20/2003 6:47:36 AM PST
by
mewzilla
To: debg
Ritter has devolved to believing that "the facts" are whatever he has decided they will be. The attorney apparently is more connected with reality, ande thus issues the loud "no comment".
6
posted on
01/20/2003 6:48:42 AM PST
by
per loin
To: per loin
This guy makes my skin crawl, the Saddam sympathizer!
7
posted on
01/20/2003 6:49:23 AM PST
by
JustPiper
To: putupon
An individual at his home said Ritter was out of town and would have no comment on the case Why do you think it's a woman?
8
posted on
01/20/2003 6:50:07 AM PST
by
Tijeras_Slim
(Ritter creeps me out.)
To: Semper Paratus
Maybe Ritter was set up in an Iraqi honeypot sting? That would explain his about face on Saddam. Perhaps the Iraqi's watched him closely on his visit to that hidious children's prison, and spotted an oddity in his reactions.
9
posted on
01/20/2003 6:53:25 AM PST
by
per loin
To: Catspaw; DAnconia55
FYI.
To: Tijeras_Slim
age, not gender, was what I was thinking of in Scott's case
11
posted on
01/20/2003 6:56:18 AM PST
by
putupon
To: putupon
Maybe Scotty has entered the priesthood.Good one. After they think about it you will have upset a lot more people than just Scotty.
12
posted on
01/20/2003 6:59:51 AM PST
by
FreePaul
To: aristeides
Geez, they all sound like Sgt. Schultz: I know nothing! I see nothing!
13
posted on
01/20/2003 7:02:01 AM PST
by
Catspaw
To: putupon
age, not gender, was what I was thinking of in Scott's caseWell that's an awfully closeminded way of looking at it. Our diversity is our strength! :-)
14
posted on
01/20/2003 7:04:27 AM PST
by
Tijeras_Slim
(Tolerance is another way of saying it's all about ME!)
To: per loin
Perhaps the Clintons got to him as a fly in W's ointment.
I don't know whether the porn charge is true. Porn is the easiest thing to plant to blackmail. People do not change sides so quickly unless there is a gun trained on them. This stinks like a Clinton operation. Remeber the Lewinsky affair and how many people declined to dance. Those FBI files were worth something and these leftist Stalinist tactics are reemerging.
15
posted on
01/20/2003 7:33:10 AM PST
by
mlmr
To: per loin
Did they confiscate Scotties computer. If not, why not. That seems to be the S.O.P. of police in such cases nowadays.
16
posted on
01/20/2003 7:34:16 AM PST
by
hgro
To: putupon
Maybe Scotty has entered the priesthood. No, I think his taste is for young girls.
So9
17
posted on
01/20/2003 8:08:36 AM PST
by
Servant of the Nine
(We are the Hegemon. We can do anything we damned well please.)
To: per loin
"I said to myself when I saw you - I said, 'That's a guy with the most normal-looking face I ever saw in my life'...It's great to see a normal face, because I'm a normal guy. It would be great for two normal guys like us to get together and talk about world events - you know, in a normal sort of way..."
To: per loin
Has anyone else oticed that Scott Ritter has become a physical twin for Michael Moore?
The stories yesterday made it clear that he was busted for attempting a meeting with an underage girl met in a chatroom. The "girl" was actually a vice cop.
We are not talking about porn, but attempted statutory rape, whatever the actual charge was.
So9
19
posted on
01/20/2003 8:13:07 AM PST
by
Servant of the Nine
(We are the Hegemon. We can do anything we damned well please.)
To: Servant of the Nine
We are not talking about porn, but attempted statutory rape, whatever the actual charge was.Yes. A serious charge. With Scott being such a public figure, I'm surprised that Drudge hasn't picked up on this yet.
20
posted on
01/20/2003 8:20:02 AM PST
by
per loin
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson