Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

UN's Ritter faced sex rap
New York Daily News ^ | 1/19/03 | Joe Mahoney

Posted on 01/19/2003 1:15:49 AM PST by kattracks

ALBANY - Former UN weapons inspector Scott Ritter was secretly prosecuted in Albany County in 2001 after he was snared in an Internet sex sting operation, law enforcement sources told the Daily News.

Ritter, who lives in the Albany suburb of Delmar, is now a high-profile critic of President Bush's war preparations.

He was arrested by Colonie Police in June 2001 on a misdemeanor charge after he allegedly had a sexual discussion on the Internet with an undercover investigator he thought was an underage girl, law enforcement sources disclosed on condition of anonymity.

The case was sealed, and Colonie officials declined to release the arrest records, explaining the matter was adjourned in local court in contemplation of dismissal.

The Schenectady Daily Gazette reported yesterday that Albany District Attorney Paul Clyne fired veteran Assistant District Attorney Cynthia Preiser last week for failing to inform him of the case against Ritter.

Clyne said that as a "sensitive" case, it should have been brought to his attention.

Ritter, who has made frequent appearances on network television after speaking to the Iraq National Assembly last year, could not be reached for comment.

Joe Mahoney



TOPICS: Breaking News; Crime/Corruption; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: napalminthemorning; pedophile; scottritter; treason; un; weaponsinspector; wot
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 301-320321-340341-360 ... 601-617 next last
To: Miss Marple
I want to go back to Ritter's comments that he had seen children prisoners. WHY would he have been shown that?

Could this be the bit of info Saddem has on Ritter?? .. video tape maybe?

321 posted on 01/19/2003 10:46:51 AM PST by Mo1 (Support Free Republic and become a monthly donor)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 279 | View Replies]

To: aristeides
I take it what you're saying maintained Ritter's credibility was burying this story, up to now. But that doesn't explain who set him up, and why. And it doesn't explain who's leaking the story now, and why.

Who is to say he was setup at all? Perhaps just another run of the mill pedophile in making caught in a sting.

If that's the case and it seems the most likely to me then the question is who was involved in keepitng it quiet.

As for who is leaking the story now, I can only say that I am sorry it isn't me. Any troll surfing for children deserves all the public recognition he can get.

But if your asking could it be political payback from the right, absolutely.

322 posted on 01/19/2003 10:48:47 AM PST by jwalsh07 (March for Life in DC ,1/22/03.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 308 | View Replies]

To: angkor
Hmmm. Marine. Based in Soviet Union and marries Soviet citizen. Comes back to U.S.

Sounds like another Lee Harvey Oswald to me.

323 posted on 01/19/2003 10:49:31 AM PST by mass55th
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 319 | View Replies]

To: Mad_Tom_Rackham
Even Susan McDougal is still making the rounds.

I saw .. she is such a nit wit

324 posted on 01/19/2003 10:50:11 AM PST by Mo1 (Support Free Republic and become a monthly donor)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 310 | View Replies]

To: Amelia
Happened in June 2001, but Homeland Security only recently discovered same during an investigation prompted by Ritter's strange behavior on the talk shows.
325 posted on 01/19/2003 10:50:41 AM PST by Jackie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 305 | View Replies]

To: mass55th
I would not be at all surprised to find out that Ritter and William Pitt shared little boys.
Pitt even looks the part.
326 posted on 01/19/2003 10:50:53 AM PST by Lancey Howard (Tag line (optional, printed after your name on post):)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 312 | View Replies]

To: TLBSHOW
The song is up and running --- YOUNG GIRL. A big thanks to Gary Puckett and the Union Gap.
327 posted on 01/19/2003 10:51:20 AM PST by doug from upland (May the Clintons live their remaining days in orange jumpsuits)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 225 | View Replies]

To: angkor
He satisifed himself? I wonder if somebody else looked into it!
328 posted on 01/19/2003 10:52:02 AM PST by Howlin (It's yet ANOTHER good day to be a Republican!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 319 | View Replies]

To: cake_crumb
I have a feeling only people who are compromised -- and therefore controllable -- are appointed to such positions.
329 posted on 01/19/2003 10:52:32 AM PST by aristeides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 313 | View Replies]

To: Miss Marple
Maybe there were reports of weapons being hidden in prisons? Do we know whether they inspected any other prisons? Are there any other reports about this children's prison?
330 posted on 01/19/2003 10:53:57 AM PST by aristeides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 316 | View Replies]

To: All
ONE MORE

Scott Ritter Admits He Shades the Truth to Prevent War Against Iraq


http://www.leftwatch.com/articles/2002/000093.html
331 posted on 01/19/2003 10:55:21 AM PST by TLBSHOW
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 314 | View Replies]

To: aristeides
But that doesn't explain who set him up, and why.

Perhaps he wasn't "set up" but was simply caught engaging in this disgusting behavior.

332 posted on 01/19/2003 10:55:36 AM PST by cyncooper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 308 | View Replies]

To: arete
"GW must need Iraq's oil pretty bad."

Yeah, like the way he needed Afghanistan's oil so badly he engineered the 9/11 atrocities on the WTC and pentagon, then framed bin Laden for it.

</sarcasm>

Like it or not, the most likely scenario is that the ADA was fired as a case of rear-end coverage by her superior once he discovered the person charged in the case is a media talking head.

The bar association is not likely to do much to the fired ADA. They'll close ranks because lawyers stick together. The DA is more likely to clam up to any investigators than he is to OPEN up. She'll emerge in another state and continue to practice law. Same thing goes for judges investigated by Judicial Advisory and Review boards.

The only conspiracy that I can see in this case is the usual: lawyers conspiring to close ranks and protect one another, because no lawyer can afford to have another forming a vandetta against him for NOT closing ranks.

Yes, I'm speaking from experience.

I will now log off and relax...and enjoy the idea of Scott having a REASON to be squirmy and wormy.

333 posted on 01/19/2003 10:57:00 AM PST by cake_crumb (What would we do without FR? Don't wait to find out. Become a monthly donor.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 272 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland
bttt
334 posted on 01/19/2003 10:57:28 AM PST by TLBSHOW
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 327 | View Replies]

To: cyncooper; jwalsh07; DAnconia55
As DAnconia55 has explained, he could well both be guilty and have been set up. Indeed, the fact that this case was sealed makes that seems very likely. If he was both guilty, and just unlucky enough to be caught, why was the prosecution sealed?
335 posted on 01/19/2003 10:57:43 AM PST by aristeides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 332 | View Replies]

To: esopman; MeeknMing
[In September 1998, Ritter testified to the Senate's Foreign Relations and Armed Services subcommittees.] Senator Biden, in his haste to defend the Clinton administration's inaction in the face of a gathering danger even then, scolded Ritter in the most insulting and demeaning terms. Addressing him as "Scotty-boy," he mocked Ritter's criticism of administration officials. These men, Biden told Ritter, "have responsibilities above your pay grade-[sneeringly] slightly above your pay grade--to decide whether or not to take the nation to war alone or to take the nation to war part-way, or to take the nation to war half-way. That's a real tough decision. That's why they get paid the big bucks. That's why they get the limos and you don't."

Source: JWR, Sam Shulman, "Biden was Right", 19 Sept 2002

The masters of blackmail only succeed when abetted by many silent wall-flowers. Every man or woman who keeps their mouth shut -- for whatever reason -- abets terrorism. The little bits count. Have courage.
336 posted on 01/19/2003 10:58:08 AM PST by bvw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 266 | View Replies]

To: angkor
he married a Russian woman he met while posted in the former U.S.S.R. Despite initial suspicions that the translating service she worked for was being used by the Soviets to gather intelligence through "attempted sexual compromise," he satisfied himself that "this did not appear to be the case."

I wonder how he met his wife, exactly...

337 posted on 01/19/2003 10:59:45 AM PST by cyncooper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 319 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
Perhaps this isn't the first time Ritter has been caught?

That's what I'm thinking, too.
This coverup stinks to high heaven. Somebody is out there right now covering tracks. I think there is a frenzied battle going on beneath the surface.

Meantime, I'll be keeping an eye peeled for strange deaths and "suicides".

338 posted on 01/19/2003 11:00:23 AM PST by Lancey Howard (Tag line (optional, printed after your name on post):)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 304 | View Replies]

To: arete

LOL! Thanks for the chuckle!

339 posted on 01/19/2003 11:00:41 AM PST by Cultural Jihad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 272 | View Replies]

To: bvw
Not quite sure where this post was meant to go, but my feeling is that we have quite enough reason to oppose Ritter on the facts about the war. If he has broken the law on any pornography issue, that is not related to his anti-war stance. I would feel appalled about him if he was getting into illicit porn even if he agreed with me on the war. Let's keep the issues straight.
340 posted on 01/19/2003 11:02:20 AM PST by Inkie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 336 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 301-320321-340341-360 ... 601-617 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson