Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Alien Enemies and Sedition Acts of 1798
Civics-Online.org ^ | 1/18/03

Posted on 01/18/2003 10:16:48 AM PST by NormsRevenge

Title: The Alien and Sedition Acts of 1798
Author: U.S. Government
Year Published: 1798

THE ALIEN ENEMIES ACT

An Act respecting alien enemies.

 

SECTION 1. Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America, in Congress assembled, That whenever there shall be a declared war between the United States and any foreign nation or government, or any invasion or predatory incursion shall be perpetrated, attempted, or threatened against the territory of the United States, by any foreign nation or government, and the President of the United States shall make public proclamation of the event, all natives, citizens, denizens, or subjects of the hostile nation or government, being males of the age of fourteen years and upwards, who shall be within the United States, and not actually naturalized, shall be liable to be apprehended, restrained, secured and removed, as alien enemies. And the President of the United States shall be, and he is hereby authorized, in any event, as aforesaid, by his proclamation thereof, or other public act, to direct the conduct to be observed, on the part of the United States, towards the aliens who shall become liable, as aforesaid; the manner and degree of the restraint to which they shall be subject, and in what cases, and upon what security their residence shall be permitted, and to provide for the removal of those, who, not being permitted to reside within the United States, shall refuse or neglect to depart therefrom; and to establish any other regulations which shall be found necessary in the premises and for the public safety: Provided, that aliens resident within the United States, who shall become liable as enemies, in the manner aforesaid, and who shall not be chargeable with actual hostility, or other crime against the public safety, shall be allowed, for the recovery, disposal, and removal of their goods and effects, and for their departure, the full time which is, or shall be stipulated by any treaty, where any shall have been between the United States, and the hostile nation or government, of which they shall be natives, citizens, denizens or subjects: and where no such treaty shall have existed, the President of the United States may ascertain and declare such reasonable time as may be consistent with the public safety, and according to the dictates of humanity and national hospitality.

SEC. 2. And be it further enacted, That after any proclamation shall be made as aforesaid, it shall be the duty of the several courts of the United States, and of each state, having criminal jurisdiction, and of the several judges and justices of the courts of the United States, and they shall be, and are hereby respectively, authorized upon complaint, against any alien or alien enemies, as aforesaid, who shall be resident and at large within such jurisdiction or district, to the danger of the public peace or safety, and contrary to the tenor or intent of such proclamation, or other regulations which the President of the United States shall and may establish in the premises, to cause such alien or aliens to be duly apprehended and convened before such court, judge or justice; and after a full examination and hearing on such complaint, and sufficient cause therefor appearing, shall and may order such alien or aliens to be removed out of the territory of the United States, or to give sureties of their good behaviour, or to be otherwise restrained, conformably to the proclamation or regulations which shall and may be established as aforesaid, and may imprison, or otherwise secure such alien or aliens, until the order which shall and may be made, as aforesaid, shall be performed.

SEC. 3. And be it further enacted, That it shall be the duty of the marshal of the district in which any alien enemy shall be apprehended, who by the President of the United States, or by order of any court, judge or justice, as aforesaid, shall be required to depart, and to be removed, as aforesaid, to provide therefor, and to execute such order, by himself or his deputy, or other discreet person or persons to be employed by him, by causing a removal of such alien out of the territory of the United States; and for such removal the marshal shall have the warrant of the President of the United States, or of the court, judge or justice ordering the same, as the case may be.

JONATHAN DAYTON, Speaker of the House of Representatives.

THEODORE SEDGWICK, President of the Senate, pro tempore.

APPROVED, July 6, 1798:

JOHN ADAMS, President of the United States.

 

THE SEDITION ACT OF JULY 14, 1798

An Act in addition to the act, entitled "An act for the punishment of certain crimes against the United States."

SEC. I Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America, in Congress assembled, That if any persons shall unlawfully combine or conspire together, with intent to oppose any measure or measures of the government of the United States, which are or shall be directed by proper authority, or to impede the operation of any law of the United States, or to intimidate or prevent any person holding a place or office in or under the government of the United States, from undertaking, performing or executing his trust or duty; and if any person or persons, with intent as aforesaid, shall counsel, advise or attempt to procure any insurrection, riot. unlawful assembly, or combination, whether such conspiracy, threatening, counsel, advice, or attempt shall have the proposed effect or not, he or they shall be deemed guilty of a high misdemeanor, and on conviction, before any court of the United States having jurisdiction thereof, shall be punished by a fine not exceeding five thousand dollars, and by imprisonment during a term not less than six months nor exceeding five years; and further, at the discretion of the court may be holden to find sureties for his good behaviour in such sum, and for such time, as the said court may direct.

SEC. 2. And be it further enacted, That if any person shall write, print, utter or publish, or shall cause or procure to be written, printed, uttered or publishing, or shall knowingly and willingly assist or aid in writing, printing, uttering or publishing any false, scandalous and malicious writing or writings against the government of the United States, or either house of the Congress of the United States, or the President of the United States, with intent to defame the said government, or either house of the said Congress, or the said President, or to bring them, or either of them, into contempt or disrepute; or to excite against them, or either or any of them, the hatred of the good people of the United States, or to excite any unlawful combinations therein, for opposing or resisting any law of the United States, or any act of the President of the United States, done in pursuance of any such law, or of the powers in him vested by the constitution of the United States, or to resist, oppose, or defeat any such law or act, or to aid, encourage or abet any hostile designs of any foreign nation against the United States, their people or government, then such person, being thereof convicted before any court of the United States having jurisdiction thereof, shall be punished by a fine not exceeding two thousand dollars, and by imprisonment not exceeding two years.

SEC. 3. And be it further enacted, and declared, That if any person shall be prosecuted under this act, for the writing or publishing any libel aforesaid, it shall be lawful for the defendant, upon the trial of the cause, to give in evidence in his defence, the truth of the matter contained in the publication charged as a libel. And the jury who shall try the cause, shall have a right to determine the law and the fact, under the direction of the court, as in other cases.

SEC. 4. And be it further enacted, That this act shall continue and be in force until the third day of March, one thousand eight hundred and one, and no longer: Provided. That the expiration of the act shall not prevent or defeat a prosecution and punishment of any offence against the law, during the time it shall be in force.

JONATHAN DAYTON, Speaker of the House of Representatives.

THEODORE SEDGWICK, President of the Senate, pro tempore.

APPROVED, July 14, 1798:

JOHN ADAMS, President of the United States.

Civics Online
http://www.civics-online.org


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Extended News; Foreign Affairs; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: alienenemies; sedition
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-37 next last

1 posted on 01/18/2003 10:16:48 AM PST by NormsRevenge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: All
Byrd Says "Free Republic is Pretty. Pretty Pretty Pretty Pretty. But I want it to be a figment. A Fig Leaf! Fie on Free Republic! Fie on Conservatives!

Tick him off. Donate Here By Secure Server

Or mail checks to
FreeRepublic , LLC
PO BOX 9771
FRESNO, CA 93794

or you can use

PayPal at Jimrob@psnw.com

STOP BY AND BUMP THE FUNDRAISER THREAD- It is in the breaking news sidebar!

2 posted on 01/18/2003 10:18:34 AM PST by Support Free Republic (Your support keeps Free Republic going strong!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
Isn't this the infamous Alien and Sedition Act that totally violated the First Amendment, and was used to lock some Democratic-Republican publishers who spoke out against the Adams administration, leading to the political battle of the election of 1800?
3 posted on 01/18/2003 10:25:13 AM PST by Pyro7480 (+ Vive Jesus! (Live Jesus!) +)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
The Alien and Sedition Acts were found Unconstitutional at the time. Not by todays liberal courts, but by Founders of the Nation when they were still around and sitting on the Supreme Court.

So9

4 posted on 01/18/2003 10:31:39 AM PST by Servant of the Nine (We are the Hegemon. We can do anything we damned well please.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Servant of the Nine
So why are they still on the books?
5 posted on 01/18/2003 10:38:54 AM PST by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi .. FReep the Capitol and San Fran This Week-End ... Support Our Troops and President Bush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Servant of the Nine
Actually those acts were never declared unconstitutional by any federal court. They simply had a sunset provision and were allowed to expire.

To be perfectly honest, I'm not sure that the notion of "seditious libel" is in conflict with the first amendment, since there's no indication that it was intended to protect libel of any kind. I realize that these acts went further than that in ways that would have conflicted with the 1st (such as by saying that truth isn't a defense), but I think the response to it has led to more confusion about what the 1st amendment does and does not say, and why.

6 posted on 01/18/2003 10:40:13 AM PST by inquest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: inquest
The Sedition Act is a "sunshine" statute and expires after cessation of hostilities or after a brief period of time, usually a few years. Woodrow Wilson invoked it in 1917.
7 posted on 01/18/2003 11:21:10 AM PST by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi .. FReep the Capitol and San Fran This Week-End ... Support Our Troops and President Bush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
This Alien and Sedition Act marred John Adam's presidency and cast a stain upon his long-distinguished career. Most of the Founding Fathers were repulsed by it, especially Thomas Jefferson, who immediately pardoned those convicted under it once he became president in 1801.
8 posted on 01/18/2003 11:25:20 AM PST by SamAdams76
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: inquest; NormsRevenge
I stand Corrected. Just put it down to Senile Dementia.

So9

9 posted on 01/18/2003 11:33:54 AM PST by Servant of the Nine (We are the Hegemon. We can do anything we damned well please.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: SamAdams76
They weren't contending with a VGWC, Vast Global Whacko Conspiracy, working within our borders. The Founding Fathers were not all on the same sheet of music, but for the age they lived in, I don't blame either for their strong views.

What do you think? Is it an appropriate act to invoke, again? The lines between open dissent and inflammatory remarks made by some speakers today may necessitate it.

What did FDR do in WW2 re: Sedition? .. Besides let us take a massive sucker punch to get us involved up to our keesters in foreign / international affairs...
10 posted on 01/18/2003 11:37:04 AM PST by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi .. FReep the Capitol and San Fran This Week-End ... Support Our Troops and President Bush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
I don't think Wilson invoked the actual 1798 act. There may have been a new act of Congress during WW1, but the original Sedition Act expired completely in 1801, to the best of my knowledge.
11 posted on 01/18/2003 11:38:30 AM PST by inquest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: inquest
Here I go again, getting way in over my head.. ;-)

I'm gonna do a bit of research. ie; and post the Wilson piece and also check for FDR and his use as well during WW2. The basic principle, while in appearance in violation of the 1st Amendment to say any thing you want without fear of retribution, may still be valid in concept today based on the conditions, in order to preserve the Republic and its institutions for many and to stifle the few who would overthrow the govt and all its institutions. (Sorry for the jumbled sentence!)
12 posted on 01/18/2003 11:44:57 AM PST by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi .. FReep the Capitol and San Fran This Week-End ... Support Our Troops and President Bush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
I have no issues with the "Alien" part of the act. Those who are not U.S. citizens, I believe we have the right to deport them at will or bar them from entering the country. I believe that non-citizens do NOT have the rights of a U.S. citizen, even if they reside in this country.

It is the "Sedition" part of the act that I totally disagree with. U.S. citizens should have the right to criticize their government no matter what the circumstances.

13 posted on 01/18/2003 11:52:45 AM PST by SamAdams76
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: inquest
Here's an interesting read from a historical perspective.. Some background from his perspective of then and now.

Column: Is the "War on Terrorism" just another "Quasi War"?

Wilson pushed thru the Epsionage Act in 1917 and then the Sedition Act in 1918.
14 posted on 01/18/2003 11:57:29 AM PST by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi .. FReep the Capitol and San Fran This Week-End ... Support Our Troops and President Bush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
There needs to be a clear understanding of the meaning of the first amendment, since there's no indication that its meaning changes depending on the exigencies that the country's faced with. Thus, if it allows government to prohibit certain types of utterances now, it allows it to do so anytime.

As I said earlier, I don't believe that the amendment prohibits laws against seditious libel, or any other kind of libel. Dissent, on the other hand, is not in and of itself libel, and it appears that the 1st was explicitly written to protect it. And if we're going to have laws against libel, then government needs to be bound by such laws as well. For example the compiling and publishing of lists of "subversive organizations", without evidence that they had violated any laws, would have to be disallowed, since that is just as defamatory as calling the government a subversive organization, without basis. There needs to be complete parity between the people and government in terms of what is and is not allowed.

15 posted on 01/18/2003 12:01:36 PM PST by inquest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: SamAdams76
FDR signed into law, the Smith Act, in 1940 which required that Aliens must register. I don;t see that he invoked a sedition act. Altho, internment, etc of legal residents might warrant that conclusion that such a policy, justified or not, was implemented. Unfairly, IMO.

I appreciate your sentiment about "It is the "Sedition" part of the act that I totally disagree with. U.S. citizens should have the right to criticize their government no matter what the circumstances."

When you advocate the overthrow of the US Govt, does that not in fact warrant some reasonable actions may be deemed necessary against those proponents? Just playing Devil's Advocate.. Some of these speakers today are hardly what I consider reasonable folks.
16 posted on 01/18/2003 12:08:02 PM PST by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi .. FReep the Capitol and San Fran This Week-End ... Support Our Troops and President Bush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: SamAdams76
(From Albert Beveridge, "The Life of John Marshall", vol. 2)

"The Alien Act authorized the President to order out of the country all aliens whom he thought 'dangerous' or 'suspected' of any 'treasonable or secret machinations against the government,' on pain of imprisonment not to exceed three years, and forever being afterwards incapacitated from becoming citizens of the United States. But if the alien could prove to the satisfaction of the President that he was not dangerous, a presidential 'license' might be granted permitting the alien to remain in the United State so long as the President saw fit and in such place as he might designate. If any expelled alien returned without permission he was to be imprisoned for as long as the President thought 'the public safety required'.
"The Sedition Act provided penalties for the crime of unlawful combination and conspiracy against the Government; a fine not to exceed two thousand dollars and imprisonment not exceeding two years for any person who should write, print, publish or speak anything 'false, scandalous, and malicious' against the Government, either House of Congress, or the President 'with intent to defame' the Government, Congress, or the President, or 'to bring them or either of them into contempt or disrepute; or to excite against them or either or any of them the hatred of the good People of the United States, or to stir up sedition within the United States.'
"When Jefferson first heard of this stupid proposed legislation, he did not object to it, even in his private letters to his lieutant (James) Madison..."

17 posted on 01/18/2003 12:22:09 PM PST by yankeedame ("Oh, I can take it but I'd much rather dish it out.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: inquest
dissent.. libel .. rights .. whewww!!

Even the Founding Fathers knew there would be snakes and rats in the granaries from time to time.

Your points are well taken. The question is, "What price freedom and liberty for all?" In our day and age, we are again confronted with those who work from within our own system to overthrow it. Do we turn a blind eye or .. ?

Many say the PATRIOT Act goes too far, some say, it doesn't go far enough. On a day when thousands protest, do we just turn our heads and hope for the best, or do we exercise our rights to confront the protesters wherever they may gather? Or do we ask the government sworn to protect the nation to move to stifle the dissent that is not born of reason, but of anarchy.
18 posted on 01/18/2003 12:22:23 PM PST by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi .. FReep the Capitol and San Fran This Week-End ... Support Our Troops and President Bush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
Hmm, that was an interesting comparison, the author's obvious leftist bent notwithstanding. Except to say that unlike the Quasi-War, the stakes are much higher in this war, and it could wind up being anything but "quasi" for us if we don't go about it with clear heads.
19 posted on 01/18/2003 12:31:45 PM PST by inquest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

..unlike the Quasi-War, the stakes are much higher in this war, and it could wind up being anything but "quasi" for us if we don't go about it with clear heads.

BUMP
20 posted on 01/18/2003 12:38:10 PM PST by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi ... Support Our Troops and President Bush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-37 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson