Skip to comments.
Police: Peephole In Children's Dressing Room Not Illegal
thekansascitychannel. ^
Posted on 01/17/2003 10:42:17 PM PST by chance33_98
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2b0ff/2b0ff750a056b0ad944798f7851c39cddccca592" alt=""
Police: Peephole In Children's Dressing Room Not Illegal
Mother Claims Girl Spied Upon, Will File Civil Suit
POSTED: 10:12 p.m. CST January 17, 2003 UPDATED: 10:33 p.m. CST January 17, 2003
KANSAS CITY, Mo. -- Police said that even if someone did spy on a 10-year-old girl while she changed clothes in a local department store dressing room, no crime was committed.
The girl's mother, however, does not agree.
Theresa Heckman, the girl's mother, noticed a hole in the dressing room wall while her daughter was changing clothes. Heckman claims she saw an eye behind that hole, and then a finger try to cover it up.
"I screamed, I yelled, I kicked the wall, I hit the wall. If i could have barelled through the wall I would have," Heckman said.
Heckman took photographs and reported the incident to police.
After an investigation, Detective Richard Neumann said that because the girl's vagina and breasts were not exposed, the department could not pursue the matter further.
"In this particular case, since the child had her shirt on and her panties on; none of those were exposed. So we do not have a violation of the statute," Neumann said.
Theresa plans to file a civil suit against the Sears department store for what happened in the dressing room.
TOPICS: News/Current Events; US: Missouri
KEYWORDS:
To: All
2
posted on
01/17/2003 10:43:07 PM PST
by
Support Free Republic
(Your support keeps Free Republic going strong!)
To: chance33_98
"If i could have barelled through the wall I would have," Heckman said.Oh, I bet if you tried ...
3
posted on
01/17/2003 10:45:04 PM PST
by
KayEyeDoubleDee
(const vector<tags>& obsoleteTags)
To: chance33_98
Wow. You see the size of that girl? You wouldn't be able to see her with just a peephole. You'd have to drill a porthole.
To: Texas Eagle; KayEyeDoubleDee
Them's some cold hearted comments :) Got more!? BWAHAHAHAHAHA
To: chance33_98
Anyone who would peep at that girl, or her mom, isn't mentally competent enough to be held accountable for his or her actions...
6
posted on
01/17/2003 10:56:50 PM PST
by
Linwood
And I wonder why some people think FR is childish and hateful. A joke is a joke, I have a sense of humor also. But at what point do we draw the line?
I was going to debate the merits of privacy laws etc, but after reading all the comments, what's the point in doing it here?
To: KineticKitty
Ok legally doesn't this girl have an expectation of privacy in a ladies dressing room?
8
posted on
01/17/2003 11:35:25 PM PST
by
apackof2
To: KineticKitty
What's to debate? Seems like a slam dunk for the girl and her mom to me.
The attitude of the Police would just make me more determined to see justice done.
9
posted on
01/17/2003 11:53:48 PM PST
by
ProudGOP
To: chance33_98
I would think the same rules that convict peeping toms looking in through windows into homes, would apply here. Isn't that a sex crime that requires registration? Also, since when does a peeping tom have to see someone in the nude for it to count? If he's watching a woman or child disrobing, it isn't to see if she's a regular customer.
10
posted on
01/18/2003 12:07:23 AM PST
by
DoughtyOne
(Ship, facilities, sun, ocean, games, food, ports, conversation, shopping, laughing, loving...)
To: apackof2
Yes, she does have an expectation of privacy, IMO. Otherwise, why would a dressing room have walls and a door that latches? Why not just change right out in the open? If the facts are as stated, I think this girl's mother will have no difficulty at all exacting a fairly generous settlement from Sears.
To: ProudGOP
Even if the police were correct in their interpretation of state law, Sears would settle anyway just to avoid the embarassment of bad publicity.
To: chance33_98
Say, wasn't Bill Clinton sighted in Missouri around that time?
13
posted on
01/18/2003 2:58:27 AM PST
by
garyhope
To: KineticKitty
There, there. We apologizes for our meanspiritedness... yessss, we doesssss!
14
posted on
01/18/2003 7:17:13 AM PST
by
Linwood
To: Linwood
Gee, Welcome to FRee Republic Linwood.
Congratulations on your great start. You should be proud of yourself. Most people find themselves defending their beliefs or their side of the debate, not their childish behavior.
To: apackof2; ProudGOP
Ok legally doesn't this girl have an expectation of privacy in a ladies dressing room? Yes she most certainly does.
To: Texas Eagle
Theres some things you just dont joke about this is one of them !
17
posted on
01/18/2003 9:43:56 AM PST
by
ATOMIC_PUNK
(The Fellowship of Conservatives)
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson