Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Al-Qaeda Supporters Threaten Nuclear Attacks
International Policy Institute for Counter-Terrorism ^ | 1/10/02 | Reuven Paz

Posted on 01/17/2003 1:15:28 PM PST by Angelus Errare

Al Qaida Supporters Threaten Nuclear Attacks

Recently, the moderator of an Islamist Internet forum frequented by al-Qaida supporters wrote that Al-Qaida possesses, and will use, dirty bombs and "virus bombs" against the United States. The author, Abu Shihab al-Qandahari, is regarded by experts on the al-Qaida network as a figure of some importance, who appears to be fairly close to the organization's "official" propaganda apparatus.

For this reason, the threat is seen as being important, regardless of whether it can be regarded as a concrete threat; it is important in what it reveals about al-Qaida and its supporters, and how they see their war against the West. As ICT's Reuven Paz writes (see Commentary below): "even though this may be a false alarm, it would seem to reflect another stage in the escalation in the tone of al-Qa`idah propaganda, and as such, could raise the expectations of Islamists for a “mega operation” against the United States or Russia."

The First Islamist nuclear threat against the United States

Reuven Paz

Senior ICT Researcher

On December 26th 2002, the moderator of the radical Islamist Internet forum al-mojahedoon.net – Abu Shihab al-Qandahari – published a short article titled “The nuclear war is the solution for the destruction of the United States.” The forum is one of the main web sites of supporters of Qa`idat al-Jihad, and one of its most popular among radical Muslim youngsters. The author, nicknamed al-Qandahari, is a popular figure among the participants of the Islamist forums of al-Qa`idah supporters and one of the older ones there, and fought in Afghanistan. He appears to be of Yemeni origin, according to previous information he published in several of these forums. Naturally, the article gained lot of enthusiastic reactions in the forum from young sympathizers of al-Qa`idah.

The article could be viewed as a mere threat, which exploits numerous rumors from various sources. It may also be deliberate disinformation regarding al-Qa`idah’s possession of nuclear, biological, or chemical weapons. Or it could be propaganda aimed at encouraging Islamists. Yet, this is the first time that such a threat has been made publicly by supporters of al-Qa`idah, at least by a figure who is known as close to the al-Qa`idah propaganda apparatus.

The short article is interesting in several aspects. Al-Qandahari writes about the American and Russian use of “dirty” weapons in Iraq, Afghanistan, and Chechnya. Yet, he does not even mention at the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. This may lead to the conclusion that the use of “dirty” weapons by al-Qa`idah should be a retaliation only against countries that have already used it.

The article is short and the usual “philosophical” elements typical of the writings of Islamist scholars against the United States or the West are missing.

To sum up, even though this may be a false alarm, it would seem to reflect another stage in the escalation in the tone of al-Qa`idah propaganda, and as such, could raise the expectations of Islamists for a “mega operation” against the United States or Russia.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Following is a translation of the article

The nuclear war is the solution for the destruction of the United States Yes, you did read the title correctly. It is the only way to kill the maximum number of Americans. This is the nuclear terror, which Americans have never feared. In the Second World War, the United States used this weapon twice in three days due to the successful Japanese attack in Pearl Harbor. These days the United States is using the most violent and modern weapons to bomb innocent civilians in Iraq and Afghanistan, and totally support the Russian war against the Chechens. Not out of love of the Russians but out of hatred of the Muslims.

The United States attacked Iraq using weapons that contaminated the lands and water by radiation for thousands of years. Furthermore, it used Uranium bombs to create maximum damage to the lands and human beings, so it could leave Muhammad’s Peninsula after turning it into a forbidden area that no one would consider visiting. Yet, it seems that the beasts of the White House have forgotten one very important fact – and we are very proud to note it – Al-Qa`idah.

This is the organization that terrorized the core of the infidel West, and made from several youngsters, who own nothing but love for Allah and his messenger, a means to punish the sons of the bitches. Moreover, these youngsters demonstrated the finest example of leaving the materialist life. They could enjoy the good life, yet they ran away from it, wishing only what Allah could give them. They sold their souls to Allah, and he accepted them.

Eye for eye and tooth for tooth. If the Americans have bombs that no one else owns, Al-Qa`idah is stronger. It owns “dirty bombs” and “lethal viruses bombs”, which could cover the American cities with deadly diseases and turn this nation, which is “a professional in contempt for other nations,” into a crowd of contaminated and sick people. The coming days would prove that Qa`idat al-Jihad is capable with Allah’s help, of turning the United States into a lake of lethal radiation, that would seem as the last days of humanity. It would also prove that Al-Qa`idah is very popular all over the Islamic world.

Yes, the United States and its allies would be destroyed, as a result of the misuse of their power against the weak. Their end is closer now, by the arms of the uprising youngsters, who while riding their horses, never step down but victorious or martyrs. In both cases this is their victory.

Pray much for your victorious brothers and to Allah who is almighty.

This is an announcement to all people, to enlighten only the believers. As to the deviates we ask Allah either to direct them or hurry in gathering their souls. As to our enemy – Allah will help us to defeat them.

Allah is behind all intentions, and he is merciful.

Abu Shihab al-Qandahari


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Extended News; Foreign Affairs; Government; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events; Russia
KEYWORDS: islamicviolence; jihadinamerica; talibanlist
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-78 next last
To: Imal
I have no doubt that you're right, the gloves would definitely come off. We would be justified in "disappearing" lots of swarthy folks, and not just around friendly countries either. We'd definitely ratchet up the rules of engagement in Iraq. But you know we'd be itching for the Big Revenge, Rambo at Armageddon on steroids with a bad attitude and a Big Gun.

The thing that's so unusual about the al Qaeda/Hamas/Taliban/Jihadi thing is that there is no geographical enemy to single out, no one upstart country to stomp on, no single face to put on the boogeyman. There's just as many in Egypt and Pakistan and Saudi as there are in Iraq or Afghanistan, and quite a few probably in the US and Canada and all over South America, you name it. We can't get them all...can we?

It's like we're dealing with the Borg, one mass consciousness of millions of potential martyrs, all plugged in to the diabolical server somewhere. If we could just unplug that server...

21 posted on 01/17/2003 4:16:06 PM PST by Sender
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Sender
Your point about the distribution of the enemy is dead on. We can't just throw some nukes around and expect to hit terrorists, which is why we won't.

Personally, I would rather be instantly vaporized than face what our terrorist enemies are facing. Although we're playing a game of catch-up right now, we're doing a very good job of it.

I am both proud and not a little concerned about the secret juggernaut we're building. It won't be too long before we can find, reach out and touch anyone, anyone, anywhere in the world, as easily as we can buy lunch. Hell, once we find them, we can kill them all with chemically-induced heart attacks if we wanted to.

Pity our enemies. While I'm sure they will hit us again, and hit us hard, we don't face anywhere near the sort of slow, painful extinction they do.

22 posted on 01/17/2003 4:28:37 PM PST by Imal (Oh My God, They Killed Kenny! You Bastards!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Imal
I agree with everything you've written, but wasn't all this said the day after 9/11?

We talk tough and then allow this "Religion of Peace" to continue building Mosque's in our country. We continue to allow Islamic students in High Schools to have their special rooms for prayer 5 times a day. Etc. Etc. Etc.

We should have taken out Mecca on 9/12. The time for being compassionate to those who have threatened to kill our people is over. Talk is cheap, action is priceless. Do it now and be done with it.
23 posted on 01/17/2003 4:33:35 PM PST by panaxanax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Sender
It's like we're dealing with the Borg, one mass consciousness of millions of potential martyrs, all plugged in to the diabolical server somewhere. If we could just unplug that server...

Geeky side note: Every Borg vessel has a "vinculum", a device which links the minds of the drones so they can act as one.

For Muslims, the "vinculum" could be abstractly considered to be the Quran and Sunna. On a more practical level, the local Mosque is a "vinculum".

And the Prime Vinculum is the Qaaba in Mecca. If it were destroyed by a 50-megaton urban renewal project, Muslims everywhere would be praying to a glass-lined crater five times a day, and expected to make their pilgrimage (the Hajj) to a radioactive pit.

That would be justified only if Islam itself were finally considered to be "the Enemy". I only see that happening if the war becomes couched in those terms. As it is, the U.S. has many, many honorable and powerful Muslim allies, and would be wise to keep them.

Just as fundamentalist Christians shouldn't be cause for destroying Christianity, fundamentalist Muslims shouldn't be cause for destroying Islam. I haven't always felt this way, but I finally figured it out.

24 posted on 01/17/2003 4:39:51 PM PST by Imal (Oh My God, They Killed Kenny! You Bastards!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Angelus Errare
Thanks. They sold their souls all right. A good choice of words by the author himself.
25 posted on 01/17/2003 4:39:56 PM PST by MarMema
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: panaxanax
There's no legitimate moral basis for nuking Mecca. Doing that would be more likely to destroy us than Islam, which is why we won't do it.

Rather, we're going to hunt down everyone even remotely related to terrorist acts against the U.S. and render them unable to ever do so again.

Not as dramatic, I know, but far more effective, and far more terrifying for the targets of our wrath.

26 posted on 01/17/2003 4:43:54 PM PST by Imal (If You Think I'm Bad, You Obviously Haven't Met My Evil Twin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: MarMema
I thought you might find this particularly interesting given all of Fusion's discussion of "Allah's suitcase" and what not.
27 posted on 01/17/2003 4:44:49 PM PST by Angelus Errare
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Imal
Just as fundamentalist Christians shouldn't be cause for destroying Christianity, fundamentalist Muslims shouldn't be cause for destroying Islam. I haven't always felt this way, but I finally figured it out.

Bad Example. Fundamentalist Christians are the ones who are obeying what it says in spreading the Gospel, and teaching the Church to obey God's word.

Muslim clerics are teaching their people to hate.

Believeing the Bible and what it says brings a person to peace. Believing what the Koran says teaches a person to hate Jews and Christians.

28 posted on 01/17/2003 8:46:22 PM PST by RaceBannon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

Comment #29 Removed by Moderator

To: Angelus Errare
ROPMA
30 posted on 01/17/2003 9:10:02 PM PST by ChadGore
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bikers4Bush
why would Bush nuke a religion that he and his administration refer to as "The Religion Of Peace?"
31 posted on 01/17/2003 9:12:40 PM PST by MatthewViti
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Angelus Errare
This is the nuclear terror, which Americans have never feared

What freakin planet is this retard from ?? We had (and to some degree still have) 10,000 nuclear weapons pointed at us by the BIGGEST and BADDEST enemy on the planet !!

You think one nuke is going to scare us ? Hell, we'll turn around and let fly 100 nukes and then get ready with the rest of them. Islamic terrorists are too stupid for words if they think that one is going to do us in.

America, land of the usually fat, dumb and happy crowd. Till you piss us off; then we go forth and exterminate ENTIRE cultures.

32 posted on 01/17/2003 9:14:27 PM PST by Centurion2000 (Memetic Engineer in training.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Highest Authority
Weather forecast------mushroom cloud over Mecca.
33 posted on 01/17/2003 9:16:28 PM PST by alaskanfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Angelus Errare
Here is my question....
At what point do we allow a obviously terrorist mouth peice website to continue under the thought it is better to monitor. There has to be a point where someone says.... the liablities out weigh the assests of monitoring the chatter?
34 posted on 01/17/2003 9:23:16 PM PST by Walkingfeather
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Imal
Al Qaeda may or may not understand just how nasty the U.S. can get when the chips are down.

Oh, they know, they know. Terrified, the rats have gone to ground. They should pull dirt in on themselves before we end their days with a BLU-82.

There is no asylum; there is no haven or safe place. They are hunted 24/7 by America's finest. One by one they will wink out like candles in a sudden night breeze.

35 posted on 01/17/2003 9:26:57 PM PST by Kevin Curry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Angelus Errare
If they had this stuff and were able to use it, they would have used it on 9/11 and 9/12 and everyday afterwards.
36 posted on 01/17/2003 10:57:00 PM PST by Grampa Dave (Freeploaders-- A $5/month donation is a cheap way to treat the left wing disease of FREEPLOADING!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Grampa Dave
If they had this stuff and were able to use it, they would have used it on 9/11 and 9/12 and everyday afterwards.

I agree. I was very worried in the first few weeks after 9/11 that there was a second shoe to drop. It never did. IMHO, we have grossly overestimated Al Qaeda's power. If they had a nuke, they would have used it. However, I am still worried about the hijackers' interest in cropdusters. They definitely have or expected to have access to chemical or biological weapons. I hope our guys massing in the Middle East for the attack on Iraq have good anti-aircraft defenses, especially against simple small planes.

We've been lucky in the sense that Bin Laden had no strategic vision. Immediately after 9/11, a series of follow up attacks would have sent our economy into chaos and depression.

37 posted on 01/17/2003 11:25:29 PM PST by mikegi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Angelus Errare
...being able to deliver it here.

No big trick to that, what with the thousands of uninspected maritime cargo containers delivered to our seaports each month.

38 posted on 01/17/2003 11:26:05 PM PST by JimRed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: mikegi
I saw Ollie North on Fox News about a week after 9/11. He said then that if they had some terrible weapon, they would have used by then.

I'm sure that we will have some things still happen.
Hopefully when compared to 9/11, they will be small potatoes.

This is about the 1,000,000 warning like this. They were rampant right before we started bombing and killing Tally Goat Humpers in Afghanistan.

When it became evident that we will move on Iraq/Saddamm, these warnings for us and the UK and have been coming out several a day. I believe it is the old bully technique trying to save their a$$es when the a$$ stomping is getting near.
39 posted on 01/17/2003 11:35:17 PM PST by Grampa Dave (Freeploaders-- A $5/month donation is a cheap way to treat the left wing disease of FREEPLOADING!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Sender
Unfortunately, they have all islamic need and ends to nuke our cities. They know we won't nuke mecca back, so they're gonna hit us first.

Depressing situation. They got away with 9/11, they'll get away with a bio attack, they'll get away with a nuke attack.. And we'll just falter more and more.
40 posted on 01/17/2003 11:37:54 PM PST by Monty22
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-78 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson