1 posted on
01/17/2003 5:28:59 AM PST by
NukeMan
To: NukeMan; RightWhale; VadeRetro; ASA Vet; vannrox; blam; Physicist; RadioAstronomer
Ping - first criticisms
2 posted on
01/17/2003 5:29:46 AM PST by
NukeMan
To: All
3 posted on
01/17/2003 5:30:44 AM PST by
Support Free Republic
(Your support keeps Free Republic going strong!)
To: Physicist
Speed of Gravity Results 'Incorrect,' Physicist Says Out there stirrin' up trouble again, eh?
To: NukeMan
What's really cool to me about this is two people who are good friends can debate about the truth, disagree, knowing that one or both of them must be wrong, but still be friends. They must not be democRATs (or at least not deeply involved with the party).
To: NukeMan
This is an interesting question - because it is not exactly clear theoretically (at least per my understanding) that gravity waves must travel at the speed of light.
To: NukeMan
Speed of Gravity Results 'Incorrect,' Physicist Says
Faulty radar gun cited as cause...
To: dd5339
ping
8 posted on
01/17/2003 5:54:48 AM PST by
Vic3O3
To: NukeMan
GEEK FIGHT! GEEK FIGHT!
9 posted on
01/17/2003 5:54:50 AM PST by
strela
(... and none of that talk about "stuffing" either - this is a family joint.)
To: NukeMan
To: NukeMan
We're all gonna die!</sarcasm>
12 posted on
01/17/2003 6:17:47 AM PST by
Noslrac
To: NukeMan
Professional jealousy, nothing more. The careers of a lot of these scientists are completely wrapped up in one scientific dogma or another, and any discovery that challenges their specific one is understandably met with jealously, rage, etc. The "gravity is instantaneous" crowd is the suffering party in this instance. Forgive me if I shed no tears for them.
13 posted on
01/17/2003 6:31:06 AM PST by
Mr. Mojo
(The Silver & Black is back.)
To: NukeMan; BOBTHENAILER
It would be nice if they addressed the phoney science advanced by the global warming Watermelon Jihadists.
23 posted on
01/17/2003 8:30:58 AM PST by
Grampa Dave
(Freeploaders-- A $5/month donation is a cheap way to treat the left wing disease of FREEPLOADING!))
To: NukeMan
read later
To: NukeMan
Kopeikin said he has found a mistake hidden deep in Will's calculations, and that other mathematicians concur. "He does not agree," Kopeikin said of Will today. "But mathematics is against him."
Be on the lookout for the specific math that is in question.
To: NukeMan
"Thursday on a report from last week that claimed the speed of gravity had been determined by observation and was equal to the speed of light. OK, so if the speed of gravity equals the speed of light and according to Albert E. to attain the speed of light you would go back in time. Then when I fall down I should get younger ...
Correct?
28 posted on
01/17/2003 9:20:42 AM PST by
Mad Dawgg
(E=EMC Hammer)
To: NukeMan
Peter van Nieuwenhuizen, a physicist at Stony Brook University in New York, called the interpretation of the results by Fomalont and Kopeikin "compete nonsense,"Ouch. Bump.
29 posted on
01/17/2003 9:23:32 AM PST by
Roscoe
To: NukeMan
Gravity is working my my body fast enough.
30 posted on
01/17/2003 9:23:41 AM PST by
AdA$tra
To: NukeMan
Bump
33 posted on
01/17/2003 9:45:52 AM PST by
Fiddlstix
(Tag Line Service Center: FREE Tag Line with Every Monthly Donation to FR. Get Yours. Inquire Within)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
