Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Grim truth about to emerge in Iraq
London Mirror ^ | January 16, 2003 | Christopher Hitchens

Posted on 01/16/2003 4:49:02 AM PST by ejdrapes

GRIM TRUTH ABOUT TO EMERGE IN IRAQ
Jan 16 2003
Christopher Hitchens

EVERYBODY seems to know the apparently smart things to say about Iraq these days.

You can get through any conversation or chat show by pulling a solemn face or adopting a serious tone and saying: "Well, the government hasn't made its case on weapons of mass destruction and there's no clear link between Saddam and al-Qaeda and, anyway, we need another UN declaration."

Those who have been getting through the past month by saying this are in danger of looking foolish in the extreme a few weeks from now. But that's what often happens to people who allow their thinking to be done for them.

On the weapons issue, for example, it is perfectly obvious that the Iraqi regime has something to hide.

The UN resolution on disarmament quite clearly requires Saddam to prove that he has disarmed. It is not a matter of waiting for the inspectors - in a country the size of Texas - to ask the right question.

Instead, the Ba'athists insultingly handed over a bunch of unsorted documents, which even Hans Blix (the man who once certified Iraq as "exemplary" and North Korea as clean) was forced to say were full of unexplained gaps.

(On the very same day as the document dump, Saddam Hussein made an insane speech in which he called for a united front with the forces of jihad, and expressed support for the pro- al-Qaeda forces in Kuwait.)

The only disclosure worth having has been about the amazing scale of the previous Iraqi attempt to acquire nuclear weapons; an attempt that was much closer to fruition than we had thought by the time of the last Gulf War. Of course, they lied about it then, too.

I can add some further detail, which is somewhat better than anecdotal. A very senior former inspector, who is a highly-regarded international civil servant, told me that he had been offered his own personal Swiss bank account by a top official in Saddam's government, on condition that he produced a favourable report.

HE declined the offer, which he later discovered had been accepted by some junior members of his staff.

The Iraqis later tried to poison his food, which he had to have flown in from Bahrain thereafter.

I doubt that Hans Blix has taken any bribes but his past leniency is notorious and it is an open secret that the Russian and French delegates to the UN, both friendly to Iraq, lobbied very hard to have him awarded the job.

This was after they had vetoed the reappointment of Rolf Ekeus, who had conducted very efficient inspections in the period immediately after 1992.

However, the United States and several Iraqi dissident groups have sources of their own on the whereabouts of some key sites, and the time is approaching when Blix and Saddam will be put to the test.

If I were you, I would watch out for the discovery that Saddam Hussein has been using cellars and tunnels underneath mosques to hide his weaponry: a disclosure that might have its effect in the Muslim world and at the United Nations.

And when the regime falls, which it will do in any case, there will be some other uncoverings that will astonish the world. Secret prisons, mass graves, bizarre sites and maniac palaces... just you wait. On the question of Saddam's links to terrorism, attention is now beginning to focus on the Ansar-al Islam group in northern Iraq.

This gang, which has clear and demonstrable connections with al-Qaeda, is made up of Arabs who have recently fled Afghanistan. They are concentrated in the Kurdish areas which have declared their independence from Saddam's rule, and they spend all their time trying to destroy the leadership of the autonomous Kurdish zone.

Now, why on earth would they want to do that? It doesn't seem like the highest priority of a holy war.

Saddam's other connections, to the suicide bombers in Palestine - and to the recently deceased Abu Nidal and his network of assassins - are so well known that one hardly needs to repeat them (though they appear to have escaped the attention of the Anglican bishops, whose most recent statement applies the presumption of innocence to Saddam in a really quite touching fashion).

Indeed, those who speak in the name of religion appear to go quite silly when confronted with this pagan Caligula who makes his people worship him and builds mosques dedicated to himself - and probably to other things.

BRITISH Muslim leaders have referred to Iraq as a "Muslim country", which it is not.

It is the home of some of the world's oldest Christian populations, and the place of innumerable pre-Christian and pre-Islamic treasures and was, until a few decades ago, the home of a enormous Jewish population.

Those who speak about the importance of "multiculturalism" in their own case should not forget it when it comes to others.

They should also be careful about identifying their sacred texts with the cause of a worldly despot.

Finally, what is all this about waiting for the UN?

Everybody is in favour of observing the rules and procedures of international law, and the Security Council has voted unanimously so far.

To speak of the need for another resolution is to put the cart right in front of the horse.

We don't know what will be revealed before any intervention takes place but some revelations would be enough in themselves to make a case for war. In such a case one would hope that Clare Short, for example, would criticise any Russian or Chinese or French veto that obstructed the will of the majority.

Especially since she seems to be saying at the moment that she'd be in favour of intervention just as long as she had more people on her side...

The Prime Minister is quite right to be impatient with arguments like this, from speakers who more or less admit that they have no minds of their own.


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-96 next last
To: ejdrapes
bookmark bump
21 posted on 01/16/2003 7:54:37 AM PST by lepton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnGalt
I agree with you .....but the Mirror is a very left wing Brit paper......someone in our government or the British government wanted the readership of that paper to get hit with that when they had their morning tea this morning.

Someone is playing the worlds media like a fiddle.....:-)

22 posted on 01/16/2003 7:58:19 AM PST by Dog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: ejdrapes
Paging Noam Chomsky, please reply....
23 posted on 01/16/2003 8:01:24 AM PST by Uncle Miltie (Islamofascism sucks!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ejdrapes
" HE declined the offer, which he later discovered had been accepted by some junior members of his staff. "

The name Scott Ritter comes to mind.

24 posted on 01/16/2003 8:02:12 AM PST by Republic of Texas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ejdrapes
Great piece, Mr. Hitchens.
25 posted on 01/16/2003 8:03:17 AM PST by Hemingway's Ghost
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Arkie2
Near as I can tell, Mr. Hitchens hates everybody. Thus, naturally, he winds up hating some people who deserve it.
26 posted on 01/16/2003 8:05:35 AM PST by ArrogantBustard (Islam Delenda Est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ejdrapes
Well, f'sure it won't appear in The Nation....
27 posted on 01/16/2003 8:07:02 AM PST by ken5050
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ejdrapes

28 posted on 01/16/2003 8:08:36 AM PST by cartoonistx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Coop
ping
29 posted on 01/16/2003 8:12:44 AM PST by patton (Let A=B, and B=1. Then AB=AA, AB=A(^2), AB-B(^2)=A(^2)-B(^2), B(A-B)=(A+B)(A-B), B=A+B, A=0.So 1=0.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Arkie2
"Ritter is a whore."

He is a traitor. Could he be charged with treason if it was discovered that he had a Swiss bank account from Saddam?
30 posted on 01/16/2003 8:29:17 AM PST by M. Peach (Eschew obsfucation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: M. Peach
He is a traitor. Could [Ritter] be charged with treason if it was discovered that he had a Swiss bank account from Saddam?

If that occurs, simply hand him over to a Marine rifle squad. We like to clean up our own messes.

31 posted on 01/16/2003 9:11:10 AM PST by Coop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: M. Peach
If any political leader in this country had any balls, yes, Ritter would be charged with treason. So, you can see, why that will never happen.
32 posted on 01/16/2003 9:13:13 AM PST by Republic of Texas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: ejdrapes
BTTT
33 posted on 01/16/2003 1:07:11 PM PST by citizen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Republic of Texas
We have more leaders with balls than critics with brains.
34 posted on 01/16/2003 1:15:14 PM PST by justshutupandtakeit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: 11B3; abwehr; Alamo-Girl; angkor; aristeides; Betty Jo; Black Jade; blam; boston_liberty; ...
Ping
35 posted on 01/16/2003 5:18:48 PM PST by Allan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ejdrapes
Hitchens writes too well to truly be a leftist.
36 posted on 01/16/2003 5:30:05 PM PST by Fraulein
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Attack on Iraq Betting Pool
37 posted on 01/16/2003 5:36:25 PM PST by Momaw Nadon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ejdrapes
Ritter probably took the Swiss bank account.
38 posted on 01/16/2003 5:40:31 PM PST by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Allan
"A very senior former inspector, who is a highly-regarded international civil servant, told me that he had been offered his own personal Swiss bank account by a top official in Saddam's government, on condition that he produced a favourable report. HE declined the offer, which he later discovered had been accepted by some junior members of his staff.

So are we going to get the names from our govt, or are they French and must have their "honor" protected?

39 posted on 01/16/2003 5:49:23 PM PST by Shermy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Allan
thanks for the ping, good article
40 posted on 01/16/2003 6:12:45 PM PST by knak
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-96 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson