Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Grijalva invites Ashcroft to see vigilante 'justice'
Arizona Daily Star ^ | 14 Jan 2003 | Unkown

Posted on 01/14/2003 8:01:56 AM PST by JackelopeBreeder

Grijalva invites Ashcroft to see vigilante 'justice'

ARIZONA DAILY STAR; Tuesday, January 14, 2003

U.S. Rep. Raul Grijalva stepped up his campaign to crack down on vigilantes Monday by inviting Attorney General John Ashcroft to come to Southern Arizona to see the threat they pose to border security.

The Tucson Democrat told Ashcroft in a letter that the federal government's silence on the issue is "seen as giving official sanction to this racist movement, both by the perpetrators and victims of vigilante 'justice.' "

Ashcroft's voice, Grijalva added, "is needed now to make clear that private armed groups claiming law enforcement powers have no role in patrolling our border with Mexico."

Last week, shortly after he was sworn in, Grijalva called for a federal inquiry into the vigilante groups that have formed in response to the thousands of illegal immigrants who make their way across Arizona's border every year.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Government; Mexico; News/Current Events; US: Arizona
KEYWORDS: arizonaborder; illegalimmigration; vigilantes
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 561-576 next last
To: BlackElk
Ah, the Southern Poverty Law Center is the group that is antagonistic to the 1100 pro-lifers whom I represented in criminal matters (without fee) when they were arrested shutting down abortion mills.

Oh, so you claim that you are a lawyer? Bull spit. A lawyer knows he has to prove his arguments and all you've done is post your claims and backed them up with nothing. As a lawyer...hehe...I'm sure that you know the definition of libel and slander. Tell me how those terms do not apply to what you've done here so far in your baseless attacks against Glenn Spencer of American Patrol and Chris Simcox of Civil Border Defense.

101 posted on 01/14/2003 11:35:17 AM PST by Spiff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: Spiff
If the state police, national guard or military crack down on these border patrol, this is one lifelong conservative who will applaud. The Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments are also the law and they trump any mere statute.

If, in Arizona, where these self-appointed buttinsky militia groups thrive, is so terribly worked up over these great threats to "our" civilization, perhaps you can explain McCain and your new governor. Were they elected by phantom ballots or were you guys so busy playing nighttime warrior that you don't bother electing guys like Salmon as governor? America wants to know, especially if Napolitano runs for Senate against, say, John Kyl.

102 posted on 01/14/2003 11:36:20 AM PST by BlackElk (Viva Cristo Rey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: HiJinx
I get the picture!
103 posted on 01/14/2003 11:36:34 AM PST by dennisw (http://www.littlegreenfootballs.com/weblog/weblog.php)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: JackelopeBreeder
This guy has the intellect of a turnip.

Hey now, there's no need to go on insulting perfectly good vegetables by comparing them to this worthless, cheese eating, sand pounding, demonrat politico!

That said, this guy is more clueless than LIEberman and daschle.

It's RACISM that people don't want ILLEGALS crossing through their property... gimme a break.

104 posted on 01/14/2003 11:37:37 AM PST by Johnny Gage (God Bless America, God Bless President George Bush, and God Bless our Troops!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JackelopeBreeder
I doubt that these 'vigilantes' stop to ask the race of the individual attempting to cross our borders illegally. They are merely stepping up to enforce the law in a way the government seems unable or unwilling to do. Sort of a 'citizen's arrest' kind of thing. So I have to wonder how Grijalva could explain why he calls them 'racist'.
105 posted on 01/14/2003 11:37:44 AM PST by MEGoody
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BlackElk
That's Jon Kyle... and Napolitano couldn't be any worse than McCain at this point...
106 posted on 01/14/2003 11:38:23 AM PST by marajade
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: BlackElk
That Dubya has Mexican relatives by marriage has been a major electoral advantage, protecting him from the claims of Demonrats

Of course his ties with Salinas de Gortari who stole billions of dollars from the Mexican people and then exiled to Cuba and then Ireland should make them wonder. Salinas with the murdered brother-in-law ---and he's not exactly loved by the people of Mexico who openly mock him. Salinas should have never passed background checks to be in the same room with an American president.

107 posted on 01/14/2003 11:38:27 AM PST by FITZ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: marajade
Oops Kyl
108 posted on 01/14/2003 11:39:15 AM PST by marajade
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: marajade
If he's on that committee ---yes he's working for a foreign government ---and a very corrupt one.
109 posted on 01/14/2003 11:39:17 AM PST by FITZ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies]

To: FITZ
Mexican politics is racial politics. In Raul Grijalva's photograph he looks like a member of the Spanish elite ruling class of Mexico. Not some border busting Mestizo/Indian.

His scheme is the same as the elite's. His goal the same. The transfer of Mexico's brown skinned underclass to the USA.
110 posted on 01/14/2003 11:40:30 AM PST by dennisw (http://www.littlegreenfootballs.com/weblog/weblog.php)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

To: FITZ
what committee?
111 posted on 01/14/2003 11:41:43 AM PST by marajade
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy
I'm not an SPLC fan, either, but I'm still having a hard time discounting their track record of successful court wins. Like it or not, this is one organization that seems to be pretty credible - and the fact that Glenn Spencer has appeared with the likes of Jared Taylor in the past could reasonably result in Mr. Spencer drawing the attention of the SPLC.
112 posted on 01/14/2003 11:45:39 AM PST by hchutch ("Last suckers crossed, Syndicate shot'em up" - Ice-T, "I'm Your Pusher")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]

To: BlackElk
If the state police, national guard or military crack down on these border patrol, this is one lifelong conservative who will applaud. The Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments are also the law and they trump any mere statute.

Well, Mister make-believe lawyer, if you knew the law you would know that these groups are not breaking the law. You have demonstrated an immense level of sheer ignorance about these groups, who they are, and how they operate. You seem to believe the libelous attack articles printed in the liberal lapdog media that these guys are rednecks forming their own militia and running around on the border with high-powered rifles hunting down "Pedros" (as you called them) for sport.

I know these guys. I've seen how they operate. That's not what they're doing.

There is no law the prevents any group - birdwatchers, hikers, rock hunters, or a group calling themselves "civil Homeland Defense" - from walking around in the border area carrying fully licensed and properly handled personal firearms for their protection. There is no law preventing any group - naturists, sightseers, nature photographers, or a group calling themselves "American Border Patrol" - from walking around in the border area using various photographic and wireless video equipment to record what they see. And if any of these groups happens to see suspected border intruders the law even states that they should report the crime to the appropriate authorities - which in this case is the U.S. Border Patrol.

Know the law, Mister make-believe lawyer, and maybe you'll stop spewing your nonsense.

113 posted on 01/14/2003 11:45:55 AM PST by Spiff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: hchutch
and the fact that Glenn Spencer has appeared with the likes of Jared Taylor in the past could reasonably result in Mr. Spencer drawing the attention of the SPLC.

That was an issue I had with Spencer, but after a lot of wrangling here on FR, that ended up being a primary point of agreement - that Spencer should probably be more careful with whom he associates, but otherwise none of the charges made by the SPLC could stick to him, and some were outright fabrications that the SPLC, when challenged, refused to substantiate.

114 posted on 01/14/2003 11:47:54 AM PST by dirtboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies]

To: HiJinx
In fact, they are looking for and stopping any person who crosses the border illegally.

Ah, the simplicity of it - you are absolutely dead on accurate! ALSO, it's not vigilante justice, it's militia taking up the slack and doing the job the Federal governement has failed to do.

Clearly, Rep. Grijalva (D-AZ) has a personal problem, that is, being liberal. "Liberal," by definition, means bigoted, mean spirited, etc. (you know, all those things they always call thinking Americans when we dare to disagree with them - their position is intellectually vacuous, so they resort to name-calling, not realizing that they are actually characterizing themselves)! People like Rep. Grijalva (D-AZ) cannot stand the light of truth!

Someone needs to tell this pathetic loser that "illegal," as in "illegal entry" (to the US), must be dealt with, and if not the gov't then the militia (NOT vigilantes) WILL take care of the problem! That's the AMERICAN WAY, and if illegal entrants can't deal with it, maybe they ought to stay home!

Stay vigilent, stay armed, and never trust a muslim or a liberal (both are terrorists, they differ only in technique and weaponry).

115 posted on 01/14/2003 11:48:33 AM PST by mil-vet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: BlackElk
How do people come here legally when it is reported that hundreds of thousands of applications to INS are stored for years at a time in Kansas warehouses? If the INS does not obey the law, what are the potential Americans to think?

Come close and listen.

Most of our cities are overcrowded, our schools are overcrowded, our expressways and freeways are bumber to bumber, our social services are being choked off, our GD jails are full of illegals, we have hundreds of thousands of American citizens out of work, our land fills are full, our energy resources are limited, there are only so many labor jobs left..

HELLO THERE! We don't need millions more people here, regardless of what the hell they look like.

HELLO? ANYONE HOME?

LOL!

You want to live on the coast. That is the coast that you describe. I moved inland to America from the East Coast.

Huh? The article of this story is about land locked Arizona, and many down there that are sick and tired of this titanic lawlessness. And yes I do live near the coast. So what are you suggesting? I move to Illinois if I don't like this titanic invasion? Horse crap.

They just opened up a Mexican consulate in downtown Indianapolis. LOL! The coast my butt. This attack on our borders is nationwide, from California to Florida, to New York, to Tennessee, to Oregon, to Colorado, to Ohio, to Illinois, to Utah, etc etc etc.........

America is largely empty. It is not by any means overcrowded

Huh? Go to *any* major city in America. It's the same in every damn city....You are fooling no one.....

116 posted on 01/14/2003 11:49:34 AM PST by Joe Hadenuf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: Spiff
Checked your profile. Question: If a man stands AGAINST the freedom of some men just because they were born on the "wrong side" of a border, is he still standing with God? What would a patriot and a man of God like Mormon Prophet and US Secretary of Agriculture Ezra Taft Benson say? I am not a Mormon but I have known and respected many and I have always been under the impression that it is a worldwide religion and not just an American one, much less an American nativist one. Am I wrong on that?

You too complain about "illegals" accessing welfare schemes but I don't notice you taking the genuinely conservative and perfectly legal approach of abolishing all welfare. Instead, you are suggesting that, Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments notwithstanding, we should simply deny welfare benefits to "persons" among us while maintaining them for ourselves. Your argument is with the authors of the Bill of Rights and with the Civil War era Congresses and the legislatures of both eras and not with me.

All of it sinks in but you are wrong and you advocate lawbreaking! Any applicable part of the constitution trumps any statute or any referendum or any executive order. Don't you agree?

You are wrong. Does that sink in?

117 posted on 01/14/2003 11:50:07 AM PST by BlackElk (Viva Cristo Rey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: Ben Ficklin
The illegals do not stay in Cochise County. It's too close to the border -- too much chance of getting caught and deported. There are no jobs for them here, anyway. The population is small and the needs for business are small. There are Mexican nationals working here -- legal Mexicans from Agua Prieta and Naco who commute every day.

The ranches are mostly family-run. The high school and college crowd has most of the restaurant and retail jobs. The biggest employer here is Fort Huachuca, and you're not gonna see a bunch of illegals hired to work for the Army Intelligence Center. The rest of the jobs are mostly high tech and most require a security clearance.

Most of the illegals are only here in Cochise County for a few hours, but the destruction they leave in their passing is unbelievable.
118 posted on 01/14/2003 11:53:06 AM PST by JackelopeBreeder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: Joe Hadenuf
Whoops make that Indianapolis Indiana.......LOL!
119 posted on 01/14/2003 11:53:28 AM PST by Joe Hadenuf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies]

To: BlackElk
All of it sinks in but you are wrong and you advocate lawbreaking!

If that ain't irony, I don't know what is. We're in favor of stopping illegal immigration and we're advocating lawbreaking.

Are there any other logical concepts that you wish to attempt to destroy today, or is your work done here?

120 posted on 01/14/2003 11:55:04 AM PST by dirtboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 561-576 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson