Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Sterilizing Drug Addicts
Washington Times | Liz Trotta

Posted on 01/09/2003 1:24:11 PM PST by strider44

Sterilization group hit with charges of racism By Liz Trotta THE WASHINGTON TIMES

NEW YORK — A group that is paying drug addicts and alcoholics $200 apiece not to have babies has expanded its reach into this city amid an outcry from liberal activist groups and a cold shoulder from the health care establishment. Top Stories • Bush signs jobless bill • GOP vows fast action on stalled agenda • White House set to stay out of affirmative-action case • Households set to face hefty heating bills • Homeland Security eyes site in Chantilly • A zeal for the 'Rings' • Warner vows to bolster schools

Children Requiring a Caring Kommunity (CRACK), also known as Project Prevention, seeks to stop addicts from giving birth by offering money in exchange for sterilization or long-term birth control. It also offers vasectomies for the same deal. Its philosophy is blunt: It is better for a child not to be born than to suffer the physical and psychological damage inherited from addicted parents. Barbara Harris of Orange County, Calif., founded the group in 1997. Mrs. Harris, who has given birth to six children and adopted four black children, has been branded a racist and more by some, but she scoffs at the detractors. "Everybody on the left and right and middle loves us because they agree it's not OK to abuse children," she said. More white women than black have availed themselves of the group's services, Mrs. Harris said. "To assume that they're all black is more racist than they could ever accuse me of. Black babies matter, too. And even if it were all black people, is that unacceptable?" she said. In October, Mrs. Harris announced the group's opening of an office in New York City at an unruly news conference attended by more anti-CRACK demonstrators than journalists. The National Advocates for Pregnant Women (NAPR), Mrs. Harris' chief antagonist, accused her of "racial targeting" and says that her group's activities are reminiscent of Nazi Germany's sterilization programs of the 1930s. "Nearly half the women she has paid are African-Americans," said Lynn M. Paltrow, NAPR executive director, adding that Mrs. Harris' statistical information is faulty. Asia, Tepper, a 27-year-old Brooklyn woman, constitutes CRACK's New York office. Mrs. Tepper volunteered to start the chapter after hearing about CRACK on a radio program. Part of her job is to distribute and post leaflets that read: "Get birth control. Get cash If you are addicted to drugs and/or alcohol then this offer is for you." She said the response among addicts, social workers and the homeless has been "amazing," adding that "not one person has said it's a bad idea." Mrs. Tepper, a mother of two, said it is important for children to be born into an environment where they are wanted. "Nobody wants to see a 2-day-old baby left in hospital without a name," Mrs. Tepper said. "I don't know one taxpayer who will say, 'Let's support a crack baby for the next two years.' We're targeting people who don't want to have children." In the two months since the office has been operating in New York, four persons have applied to the program, according to Mrs. Tepper, and some hospitals have expressed interest. But New York's medical establishment is not likely to take up CRACK's approach. The city's Health and Hospitals Corp., which runs 11 municipal hospitals, said in a statement that it is "philosophically opposed to coercing women, economically or otherwise, to make reproductive choices." Dr. Van Dunn, HHC's chief medical officer, said in an interview with The Washington Times that he opposed the group's methods because sterilization is irreversible. "Offering a woman, a poor woman, money to give up her reproductive rights is unethical," he said. Addicts and alcoholics apply to CRACK through a hot-line number on the group's fliers or Web site and through methadone clinics and other drug-treatment programs. They are required to fill out a form that must be taken to a doctor or clinic for "long-term birth-control" and also prove that they have a drug problem. CRACK has paid 838 women, half of whom received sterilization, according to Mrs. Harris. Twenty-two men have had vasectomies. Before contacting CRACK, the women treated had had a total of 1,322 abortions, with some having had 15. "They use abortion as birth control," Mrs. Harris said.


TOPICS: Culture/Society
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-32 next last

1 posted on 01/09/2003 1:24:11 PM PST by strider44
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: strider44
This is a tough call. Permanent sterilization is pretty severe, but I can see the arguement. Thoughts?
2 posted on 01/09/2003 1:26:20 PM PST by strider44
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: strider44
"the women treated had had a total of 1,322 abortions, with some having had 15. "

Is having 15 by one woman even possible??

3 posted on 01/09/2003 1:29:09 PM PST by KantianBurke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: strider44
Darwin would love this one.
4 posted on 01/09/2003 1:29:41 PM PST by AppyPappy (If you can't beat 'em, beat 'em anyway)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: strider44
Im against the WOD but I see nothing wrong with this. Indeed I applaud the efforts of any private group using non coercive means to sterilize undesirables
5 posted on 01/09/2003 1:29:48 PM PST by weikel (Scotty maximum power to flame shields)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: strider44
I like it a lot.

Thanks for the post.
6 posted on 01/09/2003 1:31:46 PM PST by lodwick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: strider44
The city's Health and Hospitals Corp., which runs 11 municipal hospitals, said in a statement that it is "philosophically opposed to coercing women, economically or otherwise, to make reproductive choices."

There is no such thing as 'economic coercion'; men and women who don't want to be sterilized can simply not take the money and be no worse off than before the offer was made.

7 posted on 01/09/2003 1:32:20 PM PST by MrLeRoy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: strider44
Maybe we should just resort to Bob Grant's old proposal: "Give them all a free overdose."
8 posted on 01/09/2003 1:32:40 PM PST by TBP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: strider44
Works every time.


9 posted on 01/09/2003 1:34:28 PM PST by humblegunner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: weikel
Yes, but playing Devil's advocate - you can argue that these drug addicts/drunks are most likely not in a sober state of mind to make a life-altering decision like being sterilized. They see a quick $200 for more drugs. Of course you can make the counter-arguement that someone who is so willing to throw away arguably their most important bodily function for a quick fix of drugs doesn't deserve the right to procreate in the first place. However, people can change their behavior.
10 posted on 01/09/2003 1:35:06 PM PST by strider44
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: strider44
1322 abortions is pretty severe. Not to mention who knows how many crack babies left to die or stuck in a hospital suffering until they die.

They don?t mention the type of sterilization. Perhaps it is reversible with an operation (tubes tied? vasectomy?)

11 posted on 01/09/2003 1:35:40 PM PST by Lichgod
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: strider44
I don't like abortion but if they can talk people into getting vasectomies and stuff I really don't see the problem.

Strange that people should be able to be talked into genetic suicide though.

12 posted on 01/09/2003 1:36:22 PM PST by Centurion2000 (Islam and Arabs = uncivilized barbarians.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: strider44
Yes, but playing Devil's advocate - you can argue that these drug addicts/drunks are most likely not in a sober state of mind to make a life-altering decision like being sterilized.

You make the mistake of thinking I care. Drunkeness is no excuse for anything.

13 posted on 01/09/2003 1:37:07 PM PST by weikel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: KantianBurke
I have no idea if it's possible to have 15 abortions. What I do know is that even if it's half that number, the money to pay for them far exceeds the cost of being sterilized. Do we assume that these abortions take place at Planned Parenthood? Does that organization receive any public funding? One more question for anyone out there - Is it possible for a woman to be chemically sterilized? I've heard of this being used on men, like repeat child molesters and serial rapists. I'm just not aware of a permanent chemical "shot" that makes pregnancy impossible in the long-term.
14 posted on 01/09/2003 1:41:37 PM PST by strider44
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: humblegunner
Maybe I'm slow, but I don't understand the Lysol picture. Spray it in an unmentionable place I assume?
15 posted on 01/09/2003 1:44:42 PM PST by strider44
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: strider44
It is completely voluntary, and does not involve abortion. What's not to like?
16 posted on 01/09/2003 1:44:51 PM PST by eno_
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: strider44
I think this is great.
The taxpayers support a junky birth a heck of a lot longer than 2 years. It's a lifetime of being on the welfare books , both medical , criminal , and shrinks.
Plus not having taxpayer paid abortions helps.
Long term birth control doesn't necessarly mean sterilization.
How many addicts really change their behavior anyway? 1%?
17 posted on 01/09/2003 1:46:31 PM PST by squibs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: strider44
--make it (permanent sterilization) a prerequisite for any kind of welfare or relief payment--
18 posted on 01/09/2003 1:46:48 PM PST by rellimpank
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: eno_
The only "not to like part" is if you have any belief in human redemption. Believe me, most of these people in this position deserve little if any respect. I agree with this program in general. I just think it presents as an interesting ethical dilema.
19 posted on 01/09/2003 1:48:22 PM PST by strider44
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: rellimpank
there's exceptions to every rule you forget. It is possible for an otherwise decent woman to have her marriage destoyed and be left with children and no means to support them. Should she be sterilized? I would say continued assistance should be terminated if the woman has new children out of wedlock.
20 posted on 01/09/2003 1:52:27 PM PST by strider44
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-32 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson