Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Oil giant sues Greenpeace
Reuters ^ | 01/08/03

Posted on 01/08/2003 12:44:03 PM PST by nypokerface

BRUSSELS (Reuters) - Oil giant Exxon Mobil is suing environmental group Greenpeace over a protest last year in Luxembourg, in which activists chained to petrol pumps brought business to a standstill, Greenpeace has said.

The company said it wanted compensation after 600 campaigners shut down all its 28 Esso petrol stations in the country for 14 hours last October, accusing Exxon of lobbying Washington to pullout of the Kyoto Protocol on climate change.

Exxon Mobil is the world's biggest publicly traded oil firm and the parent company of Esso. Greenpeace said on Wednesday the company was suing it in Luxembourg and the Netherlands for 225,000 euros (146,000 pounds).

"Esso is simply trying to squash all opposition by dragging anyone who dares to protest against its behaviour through the courts," said Pascal Husting, executive director of Greenpeace Luxembourg.

Exxon said it wanted the suit to be an indictment on Greenpeace's actions, which it called blatantly illegal and a violation of its freedom to do business.

"Esso Luxembourg...not only wishes to ask reimbursement for the incurred economic damage, but also to condemn the serious misconduct of Greenpeace militants," the company said in a statement earlier this week.

The Kyoto pact commits signatories to reduce "greenhouse gas" emissions linked to global warming. President George W. Bush walked away from the treaty, saying it would do too much damage to the U.S. economy.

Exxon denies allegations that it is not concerned about global warming and says it is tackling greenhouse gas emissions by improving energy efficiency and working with engine manufacturers.

Drivers from neighbouring countries often buy petrol in Luxembourg, because it has one of the lowest motor fuel tax rates in the European Union. Four of every five cars filling up in the country are registered outside it.

Greenpeace backed a "StopEsso" campaign, which has protested twice at Esso stations across Britain and boasts celebrities such as Eurythmics singer Annie Lennox and Bianca Jagger, former wife of Rolling Stones frontman Mick Jagger.

A poll commissioned by Greenpeace said a significant number of British motorists had stopped buying petrol from Esso stations and switched to other retailers. Esso says the campaign has not affected its retail sales.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Front Page News
KEYWORDS: enviralists
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last

1 posted on 01/08/2003 12:44:13 PM PST by nypokerface
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: nypokerface
If Greenpeace goes bust, where will Senator Kennedy get his escort when he goes for a swim?
2 posted on 01/08/2003 1:00:43 PM PST by sheik yerbouty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: *Enviralists
bump
3 posted on 01/08/2003 1:04:55 PM PST by The Obstinate Insomniac
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nypokerface
YES!! Rip a page out of the liberal playbook and throw it back in their faces!!
4 posted on 01/08/2003 1:05:59 PM PST by ServesURight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nypokerface
My thinking is the judges there are so anti-business, they have no chance of winning.

5 posted on 01/08/2003 1:08:45 PM PST by Guillermo (Sic em')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nypokerface
The company said it wanted compensation after 600 campaigners shut down all its 28 Esso petrol stations in the country for 14 hours last October, accusing Exxon of lobbying Washington to pullout of the Kyoto Protocol on climate change.

I wish someone would explain to Reuters that President Clinton's signature on Kyoto was in no way ratification of that treaty, therefore there is no agreement for the United States to pull out of.

6 posted on 01/08/2003 1:10:12 PM PST by dirtboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nypokerface
Good for Exxon. They should sue and they should win. What Greenpeace did was illegal and it damaged Exxon. There is no reason in the world why Greenpeace shouldn't pay compensation.
7 posted on 01/08/2003 1:16:20 PM PST by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nypokerface
"Esso is simply trying to squash all opposition by dragging anyone who dares to protest against its behaviour through the courts," said Pascal Husting, executive director of Greenpeace Luxembourg.

No, Pascal. Esso is just exercising their right to protest the behavior of some malcontents.

8 posted on 01/08/2003 1:17:58 PM PST by nightdriver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nypokerface
Most excellent news. Greenpeace must take financial responsibility for it's actions as they were illegal.
9 posted on 01/08/2003 1:20:07 PM PST by pfflier
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nypokerface
I want to see a judgement similar to attacks on big tobacco. Maybe $7 TRILLION dollars to be paid by Greenpeace.
10 posted on 01/08/2003 1:43:39 PM PST by Mark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nypokerface
I dont understand?...

If I Owned a pumping station, I would simply cut the chains immediatley, and forcibly eject them from the premises...follow on with a complaint to police to arrest them for trespassing if they entered the premise again...

Was Exxon originally guilty of apeasment?

11 posted on 01/08/2003 1:48:29 PM PST by antaresequity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mark
I would love to see the courts take some of the $green$ out of Greenpeace.
12 posted on 01/08/2003 1:50:16 PM PST by nypokerface
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: nypokerface
SUE EM INTO BANKRUPTCY!!
13 posted on 01/08/2003 2:16:16 PM PST by INSENSITIVE GUY
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nypokerface
While not generally in support of lawsuits for every situation, I have to admit I love it when the tables get turned on these liberals and their causes. It is high time THEY are put on the defensive.
14 posted on 01/08/2003 2:18:54 PM PST by sweetliberty (RATS out!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sheik yerbouty

That's a good question.. Does he have an amphibious limo by chance?

15 posted on 01/08/2003 2:26:05 PM PST by Jhoffa_ (OTOH, I bet she's going to be very popular..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy

No kidding, talk about the mother of all PR stunts..

Clinton signs, then doesn't submit for ratification because he knows it would be laughed out of congress and the public would hang him for it.. But he still get's full credit from the greenies somehow?

Why aren't they calling him "coward" and spitting on him for this half hearted, public ditching of Koyoto?

16 posted on 01/08/2003 2:29:56 PM PST by Jhoffa_ (OTOH, I bet she's going to be very popular..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone
Good for Exxon. They should sue and they should win.

Agreed, and even if Exxon doesn't win its stand will at least give other companies courage to take a stand. Fair warning, Greenpeace, this suit by Exxon is the thin edge of the wedge.

17 posted on 01/08/2003 2:41:31 PM PST by yankeedame
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy
"I wish someone would explain to Reuters that President Clinton's signature on Kyoto was in no way ratification of that treaty, therefore there is no agreement for the United States to pull out of."

Maybe that someone should be FOX. On news program after news program, they should point out how Reuters got it wrong, again, and make the above correction. I believe that FOX, as a fair and balanced news outlet, is obligated to shed much light on how the mainstream media lies and acts as socialist activists.

18 posted on 01/08/2003 2:46:35 PM PST by Paulie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: antaresequity
If I Owned a pumping station, I would simply cut the chains immediatley, and forcibly eject them from the premises...follow on with a complaint to police to arrest them for trespassing if they entered the premise again...

Give each a $1.00 squirt and pull out a Zippo...they'ed unlock themselves pretty quick.

19 posted on 01/08/2003 2:50:40 PM PST by Tijeras_Slim (Another disturbed youth makes good!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: nypokerface
GET EM EXXON!
20 posted on 01/08/2003 2:52:02 PM PST by Orion78 (I hope Golitsyn is wrong)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson