Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DoughtyOne
Yes it is private property. So what?

So you have no legitimate power to violate his property rights. You can choose not to enter. That's what.

242 posted on 01/06/2003 11:46:28 AM PST by Protagoras
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 220 | View Replies ]


To: ThomasJefferson
The people who imposed the ban are in agreement with you. Doughty is arguing against the people who imposed the ban.That is why the ban had to be based on the supposed "unsafe working enviroment" argument, because they knew they had no authority to prohibit legal behavior in private establishments. That is why owner operators are not subject to the ban.
249 posted on 01/06/2003 11:50:50 AM PST by free me
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 242 | View Replies ]

To: ThomasJefferson
Okay brainiac, then explain away the issues I raised. The truth is you can't explain away any need for every government intervention. And so, you lose.
254 posted on 01/06/2003 11:53:05 AM PST by DoughtyOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 242 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson