Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

CALIFORNIA: 5-year-old ban in bars leaves owners, customers fuming
Appeal-Democrat.com ^ | 5 January 2003 | Scott Bransford

Posted on 01/06/2003 6:58:16 AM PST by SheLion

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 541-560561-580581-600 ... 701-716 next last
To: DoughtyOne
Good Lord. And they think I have a problem.

We don't think you have a problem, we know.

561 posted on 01/06/2003 8:45:53 PM PST by Great Dane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne
;) Row faster...

He doesn't have to, you just sank.

562 posted on 01/06/2003 9:02:05 PM PST by Great Dane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 139 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne
As for the heavy hand of government, it really is a shame the government had to do what simple good manners could have accomplished all along.

Quote of the day D1!

What all of you smoker's rights types do not want to face up to: People who stink up an enclosed place are just plain rude, whether it be with perfume, car exhaust, or tobacco. Your mothers didn't teach you good manners, and you think it's your right to be rude. Unbelievable!

Let the other guy go down the street while I stink up the place. If you guys had been a little less arrogant about your right to foul the air indoors, then public opinion wouldn't have turned against you and today you wouldn't be on the wrong side of "the man".

Another pet peeve. Keep your damn butts in the garbage where they belong. I constantly see smokers flip their butts out their car window because they don't want to stink up their own car. It's impossible to walk down a public beach without getting cigarette butts between your toes. It's disgusting. It's your own fault that public opinion has turned against you.

563 posted on 01/06/2003 9:11:00 PM PST by BigBobber
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: geaux
So, how could it go out of business? It would lose a small percentage in favor of a much larger percentage who prefer places with a smoking ban.

Now there you go making sense, our mayor said that a ban would bring out all the non-smokers..... didn't happen, it seem non-smokers are for the most part stay at home kind of folks.

564 posted on 01/06/2003 9:18:32 PM PST by Great Dane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 199 | View Replies]

To: A CA Guy
You have been well and truly brainwashed.

Go in peace.
565 posted on 01/06/2003 9:48:25 PM PST by Max McGarrity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 425 | View Replies]

To: luckystarmom
No, it means if there are fewer places to go, those places will be busier.
566 posted on 01/06/2003 9:53:58 PM PST by Max McGarrity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 446 | View Replies]

To: Max McGarrity
I live in CA and have witnessed the success of the no smoking law. I am not brainwashed, I have witnessed the success first hand.

I have no agenda, just call it like I see it.

Go anywhere you wish in peace as well.
567 posted on 01/06/2003 9:55:49 PM PST by A CA Guy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 565 | View Replies]

To: A CA Guy
There is nothing the same about the boiled frog in water story and the need to restrict a dirty habit in enclosed public places that makes many sick. If it didn't stink and offend people and get asthmatics sick, maybe you could apply the frog story. In this case the boiled frog holds no water.

Everything's the same...rights are not lost all at one time because people would fight back and see that it didn't happen. They are willingly thrown away for others who have been deemed "unworthy." But every right lost for anyone is a right lost for everyone. You keep implying that people are FORCED to be in smoker-friendly places where they might be annoyed or made sick, but that's never been true and the bans have nothing to do with it.

It is a great idea that has been a blessing in CA that needs to go nationwide. IMO!

You and your friends may be happy with the People's Republik of Kalifornia and its jackbooted thugs, but many real people were hurt and will never recover financially from your one-size-fits-all liberal thinking.

Bet you were "educated" right here in the Golden State, weren't you?

568 posted on 01/06/2003 10:05:14 PM PST by Max McGarrity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 468 | View Replies]

To: A CA Guy
We don't want to lower society to allow your unination bar, no!

Your fascist ideas have lowered society until it's nearly unrecognizable. What's the difference?

569 posted on 01/06/2003 10:14:01 PM PST by Max McGarrity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 503 | View Replies]

To: Mears
I can't imagine a normal adult giving up anything to "gain acceptance." Nor trying to force others to do something they don't want to do...or throwing a tantrum demanding that all places cater to their whims. My children outgrew all that by about age three with my help.
570 posted on 01/06/2003 10:21:11 PM PST by Max McGarrity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 530 | View Replies]

To: luckystarmom
Well, no one is forcing anyone to ingest the peanuts or seafood. A smoker however does force non-smokers to ingest the smoke.

How? Has anyone ever put a gun to your head and FORCED you into a smoker-friendly place? Did you not have the CHOICE to go to a place that didn't permit smoking? Or do you, like other antis, demand it all....just in case you someday might want to enter a place? No need to answer, your attitudes are plain as day.

571 posted on 01/06/2003 10:26:51 PM PST by Max McGarrity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 546 | View Replies]

To: luckystarmom
That is the current law. Smoking is okay in a private club.

Not in Kookiefornia. And it soon will be prohibited in one's own home and car as well because people like you and A CA Guy have greased the slippery slope with your own hate.

572 posted on 01/06/2003 10:29:48 PM PST by Max McGarrity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 549 | View Replies]

To: Max McGarrity
People don't realize that these bans are just the tip of the iceberg. If anyone thinks the nanny staters are going to stop with smoking bans and fast food they're on drugs. Enjoy the day when all bars can't serve alcohol anymore and the only menu items these state directed non smoking restaurants will be allowed to serve is tofu (by law). It's for our own good, they'll tell us.
573 posted on 01/06/2003 10:31:34 PM PST by Hillarys Gate Cult
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 569 | View Replies]

To: Eaker
Not a liar. It was a few years ago at DFW. Now, maybe things have changed in the past few years, but I don't think so.

I grew up in Lake Highlands, and I went to Texas A&M.

How's that for being a Texan. My ancestor were part of the founding members of the Republic of Texas. We come from Tyler County, more specifically Woodville and Chester, Texas.

Don't call me a liar.
574 posted on 01/06/2003 11:24:40 PM PST by luckystarmom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 554 | View Replies]

To: A CA Guy
Just means that businesses run under restrictions.

But shouldn't there be a limit to what those restrictions can be?

575 posted on 01/06/2003 11:26:31 PM PST by timm22
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 533 | View Replies]

To: Max McGarrity
Not in my area. Restaurants are doing okay. The only ones that have had trouble are high priced ones ($50 per meal per person types). They are lowering their prices to accomodate the change in the economy.

They are opening up 5 more moderate restaurants in a few months in my area.
576 posted on 01/06/2003 11:29:26 PM PST by luckystarmom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 566 | View Replies]

To: Max McGarrity
They didn't force a gun to my head, but it did prevent me from being able to work in a smoke free environment.
577 posted on 01/06/2003 11:30:29 PM PST by luckystarmom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 571 | View Replies]

To: A CA Guy
The evidence I cite is the fact the law still is legal after challenges in court.

That shows right there that it was a sound law.

Lots of bad laws have survived challenges in court. Just look at all the Federal gun control laws we have. Then again, I have a suspicion that you aren't exactly a gun rights zealot....

Also keep in mind that we are talking about a California court.

578 posted on 01/06/2003 11:38:56 PM PST by timm22
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 555 | View Replies]

To: Myrddin
Roadhouse was one of my favorite movies. The bouncers at the local bars make the Roadhouse bouncers look like a bunch of pantywaist wannabes. The city has been quietly trying to figure out a way to pull the liquor licenses from a few of those establishments. They easily consume 1/3 of the law enforcement labor hours on the streets. The number of battery claims and civil lawsuits alone will drag those places out of business. It just takes time to document the behavior in such an overwhelming fashion that success is ensured.
The first part of Roadhouse could be used as a training film for decent clubs. "It's a job, its not personal". A thick skin is actually more important than anything else. The irony is the muscleheads also like the movie for the wrong reasons.

It's amazing how many bar owners go into the business without a clue, seeing themselves more as Head Patron than businessmen and their staff as the enforcers of their whims. Such places inevitably are headaches and don't stay in business very long. That's what it sounds like is going on there.

-Eric

579 posted on 01/07/2003 4:19:01 AM PST by E Rocc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 412 | View Replies]

To: Bloody Sam Roberts
Just thought you might enjoy a different version of the same Abbott and Costello bit.
It's the version that was first performed on their television show in 1952. It's a redux of the original scene from "The Naughty Nineties". Of all the versions out there, I've found this one to be the "snappiest". Enjoy.

Excellent ! Thanks, I love it. I've added that to my collection...
580 posted on 01/07/2003 4:21:29 AM PST by MeekOneGOP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 550 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 541-560561-580581-600 ... 701-716 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson