Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

NASA Unsure of How to Counter the 'Moon Hoax'
The Associated Press ^ | January 5th 2003 | MARCIA DUNN

Posted on 01/05/2003 5:06:37 PM PST by ContentiousObjector

CAPE CANAVERAL, Fla. -- Is that the moon or a studio in the Nevada desert? How can the flag flutter when there's no wind on the moon? Why can't we see stars in the moon-landing pictures?

For three decades, NASA has taken the high road, ignoring those who claimed the Apollo moon landings were faked and part of a colossal government conspiracy.

The claims and suspicious questions such as the ones cited here mostly showed up in books and on the Internet. But last year's prime-time Fox TV special on the so-called "moon hoax" prompted schoolteachers and others to plead with NASA for factual ammunition to fight back.

So a few months ago, the space agency budgeted $15,000 to hire a former rocket scientist and author to produce a small book refuting the disbelievers' claims. It would be written primarily with teachers and students in mind.

The idea backfired, however, embarrassing the space agency for responding to ignorance, and the book deal was chucked.

"The issue of trying to do a targeted response to this is just lending credibility to something that is, on its face, asinine," NASA chief Sean O'Keefe said in late November after the dust settled.

So it's back to square one -- ignoring the hoaxers. That's troubling to some scientific experts who contend that someone needs to lead the fight against scientific illiteracy and the growing belief in pseudoscience such as aliens and astrology.

Someone like NASA.
"If they don't speak out, who will?" asks Melissa Pollak, a senior analyst at the National Science Foundation.

Author James Oberg will. The former space shuttle flight controller plans to write the book NASA commissioned from him even though the agency pulled the plug. He is seeking money elsewhere. His working title: "A Pall Over Apollo."

Tom Hanks will speak out, too.
The Academy Award-winning actor, who starred in the 1995 movie "Apollo 13" and later directed the HBO miniseries "From the Earth to the Moon," is working on another lunar-themed project. The IMAX documentary will feature Apollo archival footage. Its title: "Magnificent Desolation," astronaut Buzz Aldrin's real-time description of the moon on July 20, 1969.

While attending the Cape Canaveral premiere of the IMAX version of "Apollo 13" in November, Hanks said the film industry has a responsibility to promote historical literacy. He took a jab at the 1978 movie "Capricorn One," which had NASA's first manned mission to Mars being faked on a sound stage.

"We live in a society where there is no law in making money in the promulgation of ignorance or, in some cases, stupidity," Hanks said. "There are a lot of things you can say never happened. You can go as relatively quasi-harmless as saying no one went to the moon. But you also can say that the Holocaust never happened."

A spokesman for the U.S. Holocaust Memorial Museum in Washington says there will always be those who will not be convinced. But the museum does not engage them in debate.

The spokesman acknowledges, however, that if a major news channel was doing a program that questioned the authenticity of the Holocaust, "I'd certainly want to inject myself into the debate with them in a very forceful way."

Television's Fox Network was the moon-hoax purveyor. In February 2001 and again a month later, Fox broadcast an hourlong program titled "Conspiracy Theory: Did We Land on the Moon?"

Roger Launius, who agreed to Oberg's book just before leaving NASA's history office, says the story about the moon hoax has been around a long time. But the Fox show "raised it to a new level, it gave it legs and credibility that it didn't have before."

Indeed, the National Science Foundation's Pollak says two of her colleagues, after watching the Fox special, thought it was possible that NASA faked the moon landings. "These are people who work at NSF," she stresses.

The story went -- and still goes -- something like this: America was desperate to beat the Soviet Union in the high-stakes race to the moon, but lacked the technology to pull it off. So NASA faked the six manned moon landings in a studio somewhere out West.

Ralph Rene, a retired carpenter in Passaic, N.J., takes it one step farther. The space fakery started during the Gemini program, according to Rene, author of the 1992 book, NASA Mooned America!

"I don't know what real achievements they've done because when do you trust a liar?" Rene says. "I know we have a shuttle running right around above our heads, but that's only 175 miles up. It's under the shield. You cannot go through the shield and live."

He is talking, of course, about the radiation shield.

Alex Roland, a NASA historian during the 1970s and early 1980s, says his office used to have "a kook drawer" for such correspondence and never took it seriously. But there were no prime-time TV shows disputing the moon landings then -- and no Internet.

Still, Roland would be inclined to "just let it go because you'll probably just make it worse by giving it any official attention."

Within NASA, opinions were split about a rebuttal book. Oberg, a Houston-based author of 12 books, mostly about the Russian space program, said ignoring the problem "just makes this harder. To a conspiracy mind, refusing to respond is a sign of cover-up."

Apollo 13 commander Jim Lovell does not know what else, if anything, can be done to confront this moon madness.

"All I know is that somebody sued me because I said I went to the moon," says the 74-year-old astronaut. "Of course, the courts threw it out."

The authorities also threw out the case involving Apollo 11 moonwalker Aldrin in September.

A much bigger and younger man was hounding the 72-year-old astronaut in Beverly Hills, Calif., calling him "a coward, a liar and a thief" and trying to get him to swear on a Bible, on camera, that he walked on the moon. Aldrin, a Korean War combat pilot, responded with a fist in the chops.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial; Foreign Affairs; Government; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events; Political Humor/Cartoons; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: apollo; crevolist; fox; istheantichrist; moonhoax; nasa; rupertmurdoch; russia
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 261-280281-300301-320321-329 last
To: nnn0jeh

ping


321 posted on 04/27/2006 8:31:24 PM PDT by kalee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ContentiousObjector

LOL! GO with the flow and start selling licensed 'Moon Cheeze' and other products. They might raise enough money to build that golf course up there, and all the condos as well.


322 posted on 04/27/2006 8:35:06 PM PDT by Smokin' Joe (How often God must weep at humans' folly.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ContentiousObjector

>>>NASA Unsure of How to Counter the 'Moon Hoax'

Because...a Hadith states, "Islam will end when man walks on the moon"


323 posted on 04/27/2006 8:38:55 PM PDT by Calpernia (Breederville.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Ditto
The Van Allen belts aren't all they are cracked up to be by the "crack pots" out there. A blast from Solar flares would be more worrisome, but the Apollo astronauts received doses far lower than the occupational exposure limits allowed by the NRC. And over the last 30 years, none of the astronauts has exhibited any ill effects from their missions.

I'm not sure about that ... haven't there been reports from some of the Apollo astronauts about recurring "flashes" in their vision?

I thought I'd read an article about this in Air&Space (Smithsonian) Magazine a few years ago ... apparently once outside the belt the astronauts were bombarded with microscopic particles that penetrated their suits, helmets, bodies, etc, and it's believed that the "flashes" are a result of this. I've done some googling on the matter, but can't find a reference to the subject. I did find this site (amateur/enthusiast site) that talks about the flashes ... but only in the context of them happening during the missions, not afterwards.
324 posted on 04/27/2006 9:14:46 PM PDT by tanknetter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 314 | View Replies]

To: bwteim

Not an insider, but one mighty resurrector.

This thread is nearly 3 1/3 years old.


325 posted on 04/28/2006 4:37:48 AM PDT by hellinahandcart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 296 | View Replies]

To: johnnyis kool; Eaker; Judith Anne; netmilsmom; Devil_Anse; T Minus Four; ~Kim4VRWC's~; ...

This resurrection was brought to you by johnnyis kool.

And it just might be the new record for thread-deadness.

326 posted on 04/28/2006 4:44:23 AM PDT by hellinahandcart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 294 | View Replies]

To: tanknetter
... haven't there been reports from some of the Apollo astronauts about recurring "flashes" in their vision?

Yes. It was discussed on the link I posed above. Stray cosmic rays hitting their rentas. I didn't seem to cause any problems. Now if the Sun had taken a big belch when they were out there, they would have got fried, but even in the 60s, NASA had a pretty good handle on solar cycles.

They also carried dosimeters with them on those missions and on their return it was found that total exposure was well below what is the allowable NRC yearly occupational exposure limit which itself is very conservative.

327 posted on 04/28/2006 5:06:22 AM PDT by Ditto (People who fail to secure jobs as fence posts go into journalism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 324 | View Replies]

To: hellinahandcart

I knew I was stretching the definition - but figured he/she had inside loonar knolledge of russia's space progrom... ;)


328 posted on 04/28/2006 5:24:15 AM PDT by bwteim (Begin With The End In Mind)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 325 | View Replies]

To: bwteim

Loonar knowledge, he has.


329 posted on 04/28/2006 5:33:14 AM PDT by hellinahandcart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 328 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 261-280281-300301-320321-329 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson