Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Stun gun shot preceded man's suicide moments before New Year's Eve tragedy in Arlington
The Dallas Morning News ^ | January 4, 2003 | By JASON TRAHAN / The Dallas Morning News

Posted on 01/04/2003 5:30:06 AM PST by MeekOneGOP


Stun gun shot preceded man's suicide

Moments before New Year's Eve tragedy in Arlington

01/04/2003

By JASON TRAHAN / The Dallas Morning News

ARLINGTON - An Arlington police officer fired an electrical stun gun at a distraught man just moments before he jumped to his death from a highway overpass on New Year's Eve, an analysis of photos taken by The Dallas Morning News shows.

A photographer for The News recorded the events leading up to the suicide of Ronald E. Wright, a 35-year-old Grand Prairie man.

The photos show a police officer pointing a stun gun at Mr. Wright. Electrical wires extend from the pistol's barrel and drape across the 10-foot expanse between the officer and Mr. Wright.

Sgt. Will Johnson, an Arlington police spokesman, saw the photographs on Friday but declined to confirm that an officer fired a stun gun at Mr. Wright. The brief police report that is publicly available made no mention of the use of a stun gun.

Several members of Mr. Wright's family said police officers came to their home and told them that a stun gun had been used during the incident.


A police officer fired a stun gun at Ronald E. Wright, 35, on the State Highway 360 overpass in Arlington just before Mr. Wright jumped to his death Tuesday afternoon. The wires hanging from the gun are attached to the darts that deliver the electrical charge.
(RON BASELICE / DMN)

"I think the [stun gun] was a poor idea," said Russell Wright, Ronald Wright's older brother. "They had him on the ground chitchatting with him. They had talked to him calmly for three hours and with one incident blew the whole deal."

Police Department policy prohibits discussing tactics because doing so could endanger the lives of the public or officers, Sgt. Johnson said.

"Based on the current information we have, we believe the decisions made and the resources used were appropriate," he said. "However, our response to this incident is currently being evaluated internally."

Statistics are not available for what percentage of police departments allow officers to carry stun guns. Departments across the country have purchased the devices for their tactical squads and patrol officers. In some cases, the guns are used to subdue suspects. They also can be an alternative to deadly force in hostage and standoff situations and occasionally have been used to thwart suicide attempts.

In the Arlington incident, seconds after the police officer fired the stun gun, Mr. Wright propelled himself over a waist-high concrete retaining wall atop the overpass where State Highway 360 and Interstate 20 come together. He fell an estimated 100 feet and was pronounced dead at the scene.

Family members were preparing for Mr. Wright's funeral set for Saturday. They declined to discuss his state of mind or possible reasons why he took his life.

How it works

A stun gun is designed to incapacitate but not seriously injure a person. It fires two darts attached to separate wires that deliver the electrical charge.

According to one manufacturer, the stun gun can be effective even if only one of the two darts hits its target.

An online manual for one brand of stun gun says that the full shock can still be delivered even if one dart falls on the grass or dirt. But the manual also warns that "results depreciate substantially" if a dart falls on asphalt or concrete.

Mr. Wright's leap, witnessed by dozens of onlookers, ended a three-hour standoff with police negotiators. They had managed to get within a few feet of him as they tried to talk him down to safety.

Earlier this week, police said Mr. Wright became agitated when he saw a television news truck pull up near the overpass. Shortly afterward, he jumped.

The incident began about 12:19 p.m. on New Year's Eve. Arlington police received several 911 calls from people who reported seeing Mr. Wright running in and out of traffic.

When officers arrived, he was perched atop the concrete wall on the overpass feeding southbound 360 traffic onto eastbound Interstate 20. During the standoff, he repeatedly got up on the wall and then came down.

Police blocked traffic in all directions, backing up vehicles for miles.

Rubbernecking motorists pulled onto the side of access roads around the scene. Some used high-powered binoculars to get a better look at the drama unfolding.

Police then began clearing the crowds to keep traffic moving, but people continued to park on medians and near High Point Church just northwest of the standoff.

At 2:30 p.m., Mr. Wright got off the ledge and slid to a sitting position next to the retaining wall - seemingly out of harm's way. A police negotiator sat a few feet away from him.

Thirty minutes later, he rose again and straddled the wall, one leg hanging over the side.

Police said Mr. Wright expressed concern with a television news van that had pulled up within his line of sight near High Point Church, about a quarter mile away.

Police Lt. James Hawthorne, the department's lead negotiator, radioed that someone needed to ask the van to move. A few seconds later, the Arlington police officer fired the stun gun.

Also Online

Graphic: How it happened

Mr. Wright - dressed in shirt, tie, dark pants and white athletic shoes - jumped to his death at 3:12 p.m.

Emergency medical workers in an ambulance below could do nothing, police said. They draped a sheet over Mr. Wright's body.

Linda Anderson, a spokeswoman for the Tarrant County medical examiner's office, said Mr. Wright died from blunt force injuries sustained in the fall. The manner of death is listed as suicide, she said.

Stun gun's role

News accounts tell of officers who have used stun guns to thwart suicide attempts.

In June 2001, a Florida police officer used a stun gun to subdue an emotionally distraught 47-year-old woman who was threatening to hurl herself off a coastal causeway.

Negotiators coaxed her away from the bridge's edge before the officer shot her with the stun gun.

The tactic worked in that case.

Sgt. Bob Newton, a supervisor in the Dallas Police Department's tactical section, said every case is different.

Dallas police have tested stun guns but have never purchased them, Sgt. Newton said.

"The [stun gun] might be a good choice with a jumper," he said. "But if you're on a bridge, maybe not. You might not get close enough to use it effectively. It has a place in such a situation, but that doesn't mean it's an overall answer either. It's one of the more difficult tactical situations you'll encounter."

Sgt. Johnson described Mr. Wright's death as a "tragic incident."

"The Police Department does not like it when lives are lost," he said.

Roscoe Wright, Ronald Wright's father, said the Arlington police officers who came to his home after his son died were "professional, polite and courteous."

"They said if we have more questions, to contact them and they'll be glad to answer them," Mr. Wright said.

Staff writers Ed Housewright, Scott Parks and Tim Wyatt contributed to this report.

E-mail jtrahan@dallasnews.com


Online at: http://www.dallasnews.com/latestnews/stories/010403dnmetstungun.5f908.html


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; US: Texas
KEYWORDS: arlington; highway360; police; stungun; suicide
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last
Several members of Mr. Wright's family said police officers came to their home and told them that a stun gun had been used during the incident.

The Dallas Morning News linked a large version of the picture in the article:


A police officer fired a stun gun at Ronald E. Wright, 35, on the State Highway 360 overpass in Arlington
just before Mr. Wright jumped to his death Tuesday afternoon. The wires hanging from the gun are attached
to the darts that deliver the electrical charge.

(RON BASELICE / DMN)

1 posted on 01/04/2003 5:30:06 AM PST by MeekOneGOP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: MeeknMing
Police said Mr. Wright expressed concern with a television news van that had pulled up within his line of sight near High Point Church, about a quarter mile away.

To the DMN: Then why not the title?:

Television News van pulled up to scene and preceded man's suicide moments before New Year's Eve tragedy in Arlington
2 posted on 01/04/2003 5:35:15 AM PST by MeekOneGOP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MeeknMing
The police in this case are a lot more humane than in San Fransisco where a police sniper shot and killed a potential bridge jumper.
3 posted on 01/04/2003 5:36:02 AM PST by coloradan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: coloradan
Maybe they did it for the children?..sarcasm
4 posted on 01/04/2003 5:39:40 AM PST by Puppage
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: MeeknMing
A stun gun is marketed as a non leathl tool for law emforcement. Nothing could be further from the truth.

1. A doped up or very angry person can handle the jolt and keep on fighting. I used to do this as an old bar trick. Hit me with the stun gun and if I don't spill "muh beer" you got to buy me another.

2. Because police are led to believe it is non lethal they will use it more often and in situtations where deadly force is not allowed.

3. I know of a persons father that has alzheimers and did not cooperate with the police because he was confused. The stun gun nearly killed him due to a heart condition.

4. The aging population of the U.S. and increased use of medical implant devices, i.e. pacemakers for example, insure that more of these stun gun uses will result in a negligent death lawsuit.

5 posted on 01/04/2003 5:40:36 AM PST by SSN558
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MeeknMing

6 posted on 01/04/2003 5:40:46 AM PST by Consort
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MeeknMing
Good grief, Meek, they talked to that guy for three hours, a job I surely wouldn't want to have. But his family shouldn't blame the police, they tried their best but that guy was determined to go and wanted to make a scene of it.
7 posted on 01/04/2003 5:40:54 AM PST by xJones
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: coloradan
"...The police in this case are a lot more humane than in San Fransisco where a police sniper shot and killed a potential bridge jumper..."

I wonder how close to the end of the shift each violent act by police occurred?

8 posted on 01/04/2003 5:42:08 AM PST by DWSUWF
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: xJones
But his family shouldn't blame the police, they tried their best but that guy was determined to go and wanted to make a scene of it.

Oh, I know. And if the DMNs report is correct and accurate, it appears they don't (I hope not, anyway):

Roscoe Wright, Ronald Wright's father, said the Arlington police officers who came to his home after his son died were "professional, polite and courteous."

"They said if we have more questions, to contact them and they'll be glad to answer them," Mr. Wright said.


9 posted on 01/04/2003 5:50:07 AM PST by MeekOneGOP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: SSN558
You make some very good points.

4. The aging population of the U.S. and increased use of medical implant devices, i.e. pacemakers for example, insure that more of these stun gun uses will result in a negligent death lawsuit.
My Dad - age 71 - has a pacemaker, as do more and more people these days...
10 posted on 01/04/2003 5:52:00 AM PST by MeekOneGOP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: MeeknMing
"Dam, I reached for the wrong choice of weapons again."


11 posted on 01/04/2003 5:57:10 AM PST by The Turbanator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xJones
I have to agree. It was the suicidal person themselves that took the decision to jump. That puts a pretty low limit on whatever liability the police have here.

The really bone-headed thing the police did was try to cover up the use of the stun gun. The BS about the man being agitated by the approach of a TV station's truck was not only dishonest, it could have gotten the suicide's family angry with the TV station. That could have created a dangerous situation.
12 posted on 01/04/2003 6:22:47 AM PST by eno_
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: MeeknMing
What's the problem? The dumb SOB got his wish, he died.
13 posted on 01/04/2003 6:32:23 AM PST by csvset
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: eno_
The really bone-headed thing the police did was try to cover up the use of the stun gun. The BS about the man being agitated by the approach of a TV station's truck was not only dishonest, it could have gotten the suicide's family angry with the TV station.

I can't argue with you, that was dishonest and dumb on the police's part. They were undoubtedly doing CYA to avoid any family lawsuits after the man splatted himself, and the police shouldn't have tried to cover up the stun gun. They were probably in shock, they had tried to talk to the man for hours, did their best, and then he jumped. The police negotiator may be feeling bad now, but he shouldn't; some people you just can't help.

14 posted on 01/04/2003 6:47:14 AM PST by xJones
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: xJones
The police negotiator may be feeling bad now, but he shouldn't; some people you just can't help.

I agree. There are no guarantees of success--all you can do is try. Beating yourself up because something didn't work is not being fair to yourself. One victim is enough.

15 posted on 01/04/2003 7:02:11 AM PST by Lion's Cub
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: MeeknMing
"At 2:30 p.m., Mr. Wright got off the ledge and slid to a sitting position next to the retaining wall - seemingly out of harm's way. A police negotiator sat a few feet away from him.

Thirty minutes later, he rose again and straddled the wall, one leg hanging over the side."

I saw this article in this morning's paper, and this is what stood out in my mind. While I'm certainly no expert in dealing with situations like this, if a police negotiator sat a few feet away from him for thirty minutes, couldn't he have just reached over and grabbed him? I have seen several articles about this and I don't recall any indication Mr. Wright was armed.

16 posted on 01/04/2003 7:15:35 AM PST by computerjunkie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: MeeknMing
what is that object behind the jumper?
It looks like a bag or something.
17 posted on 01/04/2003 7:20:40 AM PST by mamalujo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MeeknMing
The M26 will drop you when you're hit with it, the wave length of the electrical charge is very close to the wave length of muscel tissue control signals. The amperage is bumped up alittle also. The lower dart probably missed, it's set at a 8 degree angle to the top dart which is right on the laser spot, at 21 feet it's 36" low. The officer has to take this into consideration when firing and tilt the gun alittle respective to the bodys angle.

The guy went over the side like he said he would and that's to bad. Perhaps using the experimental glue gun would have stuck him to the side of the bridge. At any rate, better luck next time.
18 posted on 01/04/2003 8:10:02 AM PST by the rifleman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mamalujo
what is that object behind the jumper?
It looks like a bag or something.

I don't know. I thought it was the back of a policewoman's head...

19 posted on 01/04/2003 8:39:28 AM PST by MeekOneGOP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: MeeknMing
Several members of Mr. Wright's family said police officers came to their home and told them that a stun gun had been used during the incident.

Too bad they can't get the family to the scene to try and talk to the guy before trying the stun gun.

20 posted on 01/04/2003 9:37:43 AM PST by FITZ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson