Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Murray - A Senator With Confused Loyalties
FrrontPage Magazine.com ^ | 03/01/2003 | John Perazzo

Posted on 01/04/2003 2:46:23 AM PST by DocFarmer

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041 next last
She's a real piece of work, ain't she? This guy seems to be on the ball regarding Murray and her ilk, though.
1 posted on 01/04/2003 2:46:23 AM PST by DocFarmer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: DocFarmer
This lady might win the Annual Cynthia McKinney Award.
2 posted on 01/04/2003 2:50:26 AM PST by Arthur Wildfire! March
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DocFarmer
:


Taliban in Tennis Shoes

:

3 posted on 01/04/2003 2:55:46 AM PST by ppaul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Arthur Wildfire! March
This lady might win the Annual Cynthia McKinney Award.

The award might even have to be renamed.

4 posted on 01/04/2003 3:07:21 AM PST by expatguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: DocFarmer
Indeed she said nothing about the $848 million the US has already spent for humanitarian relief and reconstruction in Afghanistan – including the rebuilding of schools, roads, and irrigation systems that were destroyed in conflicts long predating any American presence in that country.

Furthermore, America spent around $180M dollars on aid to Afghanistan (and Afghan refugees in surrounding countries) in the year before 911. For more, including many links down thread, see the following:

Humanitarian Work Progressing in Afghanistan

5 posted on 01/04/2003 3:31:04 AM PST by Stultis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DocFarmer
"....it was United States Senator Patty Murray of Washington, speaking to an audience of high-school students at Vancouver’s Columbia River High School on December 18. Soon thereafter her comments appeared on the pro-bin Laden Website, Taliban Online, under the heading "Democrat Senator Praises bin Laden."

Couple these comments by this DEMOCRAT senator, the overwhelming silence from this DEMOCRAT senator's DEMOCRAT collegues in the senate and the DEMOCRAT clinton administration's initiative to rush thru citizenship in time for middle easterners to vote DEMOCRAT in the '96 election and you have the makings of a real DEMOCRATIC 5th column.

6 posted on 01/04/2003 4:24:09 AM PST by RushLake
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Arthur Wildfire! March
This lady might win the Annual Cynthia McKinney Award.

I know you were just trying to be nice to the communist, but really...my wife is a lady, my daughter is a lady. Perhaps some desperate soul might tell Patty bin Murray that she is a lady at 10 minutes to closing time, but in the morning my wife and daughter will still be ladies.

7 posted on 01/04/2003 4:28:32 AM PST by RushLake
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: DocFarmer

RETIRE PATTY!

Speaking of our senior senator, the WSRP has just started a web site devoted to unseating Patty Murray when she’s up for re-election in 2004. It’s called www.retirepatty.com. Be sure to check it out! We’ll be updating it regularly with new information.
8 posted on 01/04/2003 4:30:13 AM PST by BullDog108
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DocFarmer
Ok, and the simple fact that she 1. calls herself a senator. 2. calls herself a democrat. 3. calls herself a woman. 4. calls herself an American, is enough to turn my stomach.
9 posted on 01/04/2003 4:45:32 AM PST by wita
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DocFarmer
Let's keep it simple.

Patty Murray is literally a drooling idiot. If she wasn't in Congress, she'd be checking groceries at your neighborhood Kroger.

10 posted on 01/04/2003 4:48:39 AM PST by RightOnline
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BullDog108
BullDog108,
I hope you won't take this wrong, but...

RETIRE?!?

HELL NO!!!


IMPEACH PATTY!


CONVICT PATTY!


JAIL PATTY FOR LIFE!!!


11 posted on 01/04/2003 5:00:47 AM PST by DocFarmer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: RightOnline
If she wasn't in Congress, she'd be checking groceries at your neighborhood Kroger.

No, that actually takes some brains. I doubt she'd qualify as a bagger (3rd class)...

12 posted on 01/04/2003 5:03:02 AM PST by DocFarmer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: DocFarmer
Unfortunately, neither Murray nor the COC offer any suggestions as to how

The shrillest critics never offer a real alternative.

13 posted on 01/04/2003 5:07:52 AM PST by StriperSniper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: StriperSniper
StriperSniper,

Actually, the only real alternative has already been suggested.

By President Bush.

It's called the "War on Terrorism".

And this will not be a war won by negotiation or appeasement. It will be won by killing the enemy. That's a brutal viewpoint, but it has historical basis. And it works.

Murray's incredibly stupid comments have only bolstered support for terrorism. She has given aid and comfort to the enemy in a time of war. Check Article III, Section 3 of the US Constitution. They describe Murray's actions perfectly.

It's called Treason.

The "shrill" critics believe she should be kicked out of the Senate. Although I don't believe myself to be "shrill", I am a critic and I do agree that they should boot her sorry arse out of Congress and convict her for treason. And while they're at it, they should do the same to Baghdad Jim and his other cohorts as well.

Many thanks.
14 posted on 01/04/2003 5:13:37 AM PST by DocFarmer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: DocFarmer
Patty Murray Is a leftwing blame and hate america Everone can do it better Than america.Get a life Patty Murray and get out of the senate.We need someone that love thier country and will stand with it not stand apart!!!!!!!!!!
15 posted on 01/04/2003 5:16:31 AM PST by solo gringo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DocFarmer
Confused loyalties? Where her loyalty lies seems clear to me.
16 posted on 01/04/2003 5:17:12 AM PST by BikerTrash
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DocFarmer
Someone in Bellingham has started a Recall Petition. Anyone have that link?
17 posted on 01/04/2003 5:17:47 AM PST by BullDog108
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: RushLake
Exactly Right!

The word 'Lady' is one of the most overused and inappropriately used words in American English.

The word 'Lady' (which is functionally equivalent to the word 'Gentlemen') is not a title, in the British sense.

Nor is it an honorific, in the sense that many Oriental languages rigidly assign rank and social stature to certain classes with modifiers such as the Japanese San.

Properly used, the word 'Lady' is a term that specifies a particular and individual human female whose behavior is sufficiently superior to the societal average to merit special distinction. It IS NOT properly interchangeable with the word 'woman'.

Unfortunately, many American men tend to be overly deferential to women and apply this term indiscriminately.

This has the regrettable effect of elevating many mere women, and even some bitches, sluts, whores, harpies and tramps above their station, while robbing authentic ladies of the distinction they have -by their behavior- earned.

I NEVER assume that a human female is a 'Lady' by virtue of her gender.

In those cases where I simply don't know the nature of the human female I'm referring to, 'woman' is the term that I initially use, it being both properly descriptive and judgement-neutral.

Of course, in those cases where the human female in question is known to be a bitch, slut, whore, harpy and tramp I always attempt to use the term that best describes the nature of her debasement most accurately.

18 posted on 01/04/2003 5:33:15 AM PST by DWSUWF
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: DocFarmer
In our current situation, I agree that for the most part we are doing the right thing. My point was also meant to be a broader statement about the state of the left in particular. They have a myriad of gripes with no solutions, just "the other side is wrong". This indicates one of two possibilities. First, they truly have no clue, and thus are incompetent to their charged posts. Or as you suggest, traitorous intent.

I lean toward the latter, with a healthy dose of the former!

(Time to start heating the tar, and plucking the chickens ;-)

19 posted on 01/04/2003 5:35:01 AM PST by StriperSniper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Arthur Wildfire! March
This lady might win the Annual Cynthia McKinney Award.

Seriously, Murray is beginning to irritate me almost as much. I didn't think that was possible.

I'm just sorry there has to be an annual award. But it's looking like a necesssity.

20 posted on 01/04/2003 5:48:27 AM PST by hellinahandcart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson