Posted on 01/03/2003 2:45:28 PM PST by Remedy
AND IMPEACH THE NINTH!
Start the confiscation in a nice sparsely populated state like Montana where gun owners are unlikely to put up much resistance.
Petition to the President of the United States and Members of Congress
To declare that anyone who pledges allegiance to the Flag of our Country is breaking the law is to declare the President of the United States and every member of Congress to be law breakers. It has become abundantly clear that the two judges that voted for this must be impeached and removed from office. Please use the authority that you have been invested with and immediately vote to impeach judges Stephen Reinhardt and Alfred Goodwin.
I speak as an American citizen. The recent decision of the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals in San Francisco where the Pledge of Allegiance was ruled Unconstitutional is an attack on America by way of the legal system. We are indeed "One Nation Under God."
Read this related article: Judges that Ruled America is not "One Nation Under God" Must be Impeached
Date: June 27, 2002
From: Mathew Staver, Esq.
Judges that Ruled America is not "One Nation Under God" Must be Impeached!
On June 26, 2002, I was in a meeting out of my office when I received a call that a federal court ruled the Pledge of Allegiance unconstitutional. My first reaction was to question whether the call was a prank, and when I realized the caller was serious, my reaction turned to shock and outrage.
The decision to declare the Pledge of Allegiance unconstitutional was handed down by what is known as the Ninth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, the most liberal circuit court of appeals in the country. This court is the most reversed court in the country by the United States Supreme Court.
Although I am confident that this decision will be reversed, it’s a tragedy that it comes so close on the heels of September 11. The two judges that ruled in the majority essentially spit in the face of every veteran who shed blood to preserve the freedom of all Americans. This court essentially has turned its back on those who are currently overseas to defend this country in the war against terrorism.
The Ninth Circuit has always been a radical, left-leaning court. A recent survey showed that 80%-90% of the Ninth Circuit’s decisions are reversed by the U.S. Supreme Court. In one recent term, the Supreme Court reversed 24 of the Ninth Circuit’s decisions, and 16 of those decision were reversed by a 9-0 opinion by the United States Supreme Court. It’s hard to find the United States Supreme Court unanimously agreeing on anything, but one thing it has agreed on is that the Ninth Circuit is in left field.
It is time for Congress to take action and impeach the two judges on this Federal Court. They will only act if we all get involved and let them know our outrage. I am asking you to sign this petition and forward it to all your friends. You may not be able to go overseas and fight for our freedoms, but you can take a stand by signing this petition.
One of the two judges in the majority, Stephen Reinhardt, is a holdover from the liberal judges appointed by President Carter. This judge is even left of the Ninth Circuit Court. Judge Reinhardt once issued an opinion that the United States Constitution guarantees the right to assisted suicide. This decision was overruled. During one term of the Supreme Court, this same judge was unanimously reversed 5 separate times by the High Court on 5 separate cases. Obviously a judge like this does not belong on a Federal Court.
In just a few days America will celebrate its 226th birthday on the Fourth of July. In spite of what a couple of liberal judges say, this is still "One Nation Under God."It is imperative that every patriotic American signs this petition.
This petition will immediately be forwarded to all 535 members of the U.S. Congress. Those members have the authority to remove these judges. This petition will also be sent to President George W. Bush.
After you sign this petition, please forward this web link to everyone you know. Every family member and friend must join together with us and take a stand against this assault of the American spirit.
Let everyone in America in every schoolhouse and every church house lift their voices and their pens and cry out that we are indeed "One Nation Under God."
The Ninth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals was asked yesterday to reconsider its Dec. 6 ruling that individuals have no right to bear arms under the Second Amendment.
In ruling 2-1, the court upheld California’s ban on assault weapons. The ruling and the 70-page opinion by Judge Stephen Reinhardt was seen by many observers as a response to U.S. Attorney General John Ashcroft’s endorsement of a Fifth Circuit decision that went the other way.
Reinhardt said the Second Amendment never was meant to guarantee gun rights to individuals, but only to state-run militias like the national guard.
Impeach and remove from office.
One way or another, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals has to go. It's a rat infested marxist cell.
Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals Reorganization Act of 2001 (Introduced in House)
HR 1203 IH
107th CONGRESS
1st Session
H. R. 1203
To amend chapter 3 of title 28, United States Code, to divide the Ninth Judicial Circuit of the United States into two circuits, and for other purposes.
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
Mr. SIMPSON introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary
A BILL
To amend chapter 3 of title 28, United States Code, to divide the Ninth Judicial Circuit of the United States into two circuits, and for other purposes.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
This Act may be cited as the `Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals Reorganization Act of 2001'.
Section 41 of title 28, United States Code, is amended--
(1) in the matter before the table, by striking `thirteen' and inserting `fourteen'; and
(2) in the table--
(A) by striking the item relating to the ninth circuit and inserting the following:
`Ninth
Arizona, California, Nevada.';
and
(B) by inserting between the last 2 items the following:
`Twelfth
Alaska, Guam, Hawaii, Idaho, Montana, Northern Mariana Islands, Oregon, Washington.'.
The table in section 44(a) of title 28, United States Code, is amended--
(1) by striking the item relating to the ninth circuit and inserting the following:
20';
and
(2) by inserting between the last 2 items the following:
8'.
The table in section 48(a) of title 28, United States Code, is amended--
(1) by striking the item relating to the ninth circuit and inserting the following:
`Ninth
San Francisco, Los Angeles.';
and
(2) by inserting between the last 2 items at the end the following:
`Twelfth
Portland, Seattle.'.
Each circuit judge in regular active service of the former ninth circuit whose official station on the day before the effective date of this Act--
(1) is in Arizona, California, or Nevada is assigned as a circuit judge of the new ninth circuit; and
(2) is in Alaska, Guam, Hawaii, Idaho, Montana, Northern Mariana Islands, Oregon, or Washington is assigned as a circuit judge of the twelfth circuit.
Each judge who is a senior judge of the former ninth circuit on the day before the effective date of this Act may elect to be assigned to the new ninth circuit or to the twelfth circuit and shall notify the Director of the Administrative Office of the United States Courts of such election.
The seniority of each judge--
(1) who is assigned under section 5 of this Act; or
(2) who elects to be assigned under section 6 of this Act;
shall run from the date of commission of such judge as a judge of the former ninth circuit.
The provisions of the following paragraphs of this section apply to any case in which, on the day before the effective date of this Act, an appeal or other proceeding has been filed with the former ninth circuit:
(1) If the matter has been submitted for decision, further proceedings in respect of the matter shall be had in the same manner and with the same effect as if this Act had not been enacted.
(2) If the matter has not been submitted for decision, the appeal or proceeding, together with the original papers, printed records, and record entries duly certified, shall, by appropriate orders, be transferred to the court to which the matter would have been submitted had this Act been in full force and effect at the time such appeal was taken or other proceeding commenced, and further proceedings in respect of the case shall be had in the same manner and with the same effect as if the appeal or other proceeding had been filed in such court.
(3) A petition for rehearing or a petition for rehearing en banc in a matter decided before the effective date of this Act, or submitted before the effective date of this Act and decided on or after the effective date as provided in paragraph (1), shall be treated in the same manner and with the same effect as though this Act had not been enacted. If a petition for rehearing en banc is granted, the matter shall be reheard by a court comprised as though this Act had not been enacted.
In this Act, the term--
(1) `former ninth circuit' means the ninth judicial circuit of the United States as in existence on the day before the effective date of this Act;
(2) `new ninth circuit' means the ninth judicial circuit of the United States established by the amendment made by section 2(2)(A); and
(3) `twelfth circuit' means the twelfth judicial circuit of the United States established by the amendment made by section 2(2)(B).
The court of appeals for the ninth circuit as constituted on the day before the effective date of this Act may take such administrative action as may be required to carry out this Act and the amendments made by this Act. Such court shall cease to exist for administrative purposes on July 1, 2003.
This Act and the amendments made by this Act shall become effective on October 1, 2001.
|
It's a rat infested marxist cell. |
The Claremont Institute: Balancing the Ninth
There is a lack of balance on the Ninth Circuit, but it is not the one Senator Barbara Boxer would have us all believe. Of the 25 active judges currently serving on the court, 18 were appointed by Democrats (4 by President Carter and 14 by President Clinton). Only 7 were appointed by Republican Presidents (3 by President Reagan, 4 by the President George H. W. Bush). Even with the appointment of people like Cox and Kuhl, Democrat appointments will retain a 2 to 1 margin on the court, and given the high number of appointments made by President Clinton — 50% of the total seats authorized on the court — it will be a long time before that imbalance even begins to be corrected.
|
Impeach and |
Simpson’s bill would narrow the 9th Circuit to comprise just California, Arizona and Nevada
Why all of that? It'd still be a huge Circuit. I'd just give them SoCal.
1st- 9.9 mil
2nd- 2.3 mil
3rd- 21.5 mil
4th- 26.2 mil
5th- 28.3 mil
6th- 31.1 mil
7th- 23.9 mil
8th- 19.3 mil
9th- 54.3 mil
10th- 15.1 mil
11th-28.7 mil
If CA with 33.9 mil were split off to another circuit by itself, the 10th would be reduced to 20.4 mil
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.