Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Prosecutors are urged to fight against legalizing drugs like marijuana
Standard Democrat(Mississippi) | 12/29/02 | Scott Welton

Posted on 01/02/2003 5:17:17 AM PST by Sparta

BENTON - Prosecutors around the country are being urged to take a stand against attempts to legalize or decriminalize controlled substances - in particular, marijuana.

“Those who support drug legalization are well funded and highly adept at manipulating the media,” reads a Nov. 1 letter to prosecutors from the president of the National District Attorneys Association, Dan M. Alsobrooks. “And they do not mind deceiving the American public as well.”

The letter warns of “incremental victories” by those in favor of legalizing drugs and notes the “key role” local prosecutors play in anti-drug efforts.

Included with the letter was an open letter also dated Nov. 1 from Scott M. Burns, deputy director for state and local affairs for the White House Office of National Drug Control Policy, urging prosecutors “to take a stand publicly and tell Americans the truth” about marijuana and warning of “deceptive campaigns to normalize and ultimately legalize the use of marijuana.”

“I think it would be a nightmare to legalize it,” agreed Scott County Assistant Prosecutor Paul Boyd. “It would lead to so many more people out there high operating machinery and other things.” Boyd will be sworn in as the next county prosecutor at 11:30 a.m. Tuesday.

Of the 16 million drug users in America, 77 percent use marijuana and 60 percent of teenagers in treatment have a primary marijuana diagnosis, according to Burns. “No drug matches the threat posed by marijuana.”

Marijuana, Burns writes in the letter, is not harmless but has risen as a factor in emergency room visits 176 percent since 1994, surpassing heroin.

Burns writes of the increasing potency of marijuana and its addictive properties in addition to being a “gateway drug” for many people.

“I would agree that marijuana is a gateway drug to hardcore drugs,” Boyd said. Marijuana is “the great seducer,” Boyd said, because “it breaks down a person’s defense to say ‘no’ to the harder drugs.”

John McMinn of Charleston, administrator for the Circuit 33 Drug Court, also agrees that marijuana remains a problem for the courts.

According to National Institute of Justice statistics on arrests, 39 percent of the males and 26 percent of the females test positive for marijuana, and 53 percent of male juveniles and 38 percent of female juveniles test positive. “Roughly 80 percent of adult offenders in the 33rd Circuit Court come in with some kind of a drug issue be it alcohol or some other drug,” McMinn said.

“More people enter drug treatment every year because of marijuana as their drug of choice,” he added.

McMinn said a 2001 study of students in grades 8-10 showed 20 percent of 8th graders had used marijuana and 9 percent were current users, defined as having used the drug within the past 30 days. By the 12th grade, nearly half of the students had tried marijuana and 22 percent were current users.

McMinn does think research on medicinal and therapeutic properties should be pursued: “There is still so much research left to be done regarding the use of marijuana - the good and the bad.”

However, “there are other drugs that will work as well as marijuana,” he added, with some of the alternatives being more addictive and others that are just as effective while being safer.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Extended News; Government; News/Current Events; Philosophy; US: Mississippi
KEYWORDS: addictedlosers; druglawskill; drugskill; jobprotection; willprosecuteforfood
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 281-297 next last
To: strela
Hmmm . . . that sounds really tempting. Let me fire up this bone whilst I whip out my wallet . . .
41 posted on 01/02/2003 6:34:19 AM PST by Hemingway's Ghost
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Kevin Curry
Kevin, socialism and trying to control people goes together like screws and nuts. You claim that money is the reason you oppose the legalization of drugs. What if a law were passed that prevented public money from being used to treat dopers? Would you support it then?
42 posted on 01/02/2003 6:34:56 AM PST by Blood of Tyrants
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Kevin Curry
And all the pro-dope ersatz conservatives posting here will cheer the dawning of a new age of nanny state socialism.

What is wrong with allowing individual states decide how they will treat the recreation use of drugs?

43 posted on 01/02/2003 6:36:49 AM PST by Blood of Tyrants
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Blood of Tyrants
What if a law were passed that prevented public money from being used to treat dopers? Would you support it then?

If he won't, I will. Nothing pisses me off more than someone stealing my money to pay the freight for people who can't handle themselves.

44 posted on 01/02/2003 6:37:20 AM PST by Hemingway's Ghost
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Sparta
My, George Soros's blind and groping little liberdopian nanny socialist wasps are angry this morning. Whack their mud nest with the stick of truth and watch them go beserk.
45 posted on 01/02/2003 6:39:12 AM PST by Kevin Curry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sparta
On the one hand I don't care for drugs and their "legalization" but on the other I don't care for the federal government meddling in what should be a state/local issue. I never really did much research since it didn't concern me, but I was always under the impression that drugs weren't explicitly mentioned in the Constitution, therefore they should be decided at the state level.
46 posted on 01/02/2003 6:39:18 AM PST by af_vet_rr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gorons
No, our duly elected representatives (Such as Patty Murray) are too busy praising OBL.

Well, that's a relief. For a moment there, I was beginning to think we couldn't trust them.

47 posted on 01/02/2003 6:39:19 AM PST by tacticalogic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Hemingway's Ghost
While i'm for legalization of Pot I would still agree with this statement, one reason is that Pot is not Physically addictive and I don't condone nor support legalization of Narcotics which are the people that end needing this help.
48 posted on 01/02/2003 6:39:51 AM PST by HELLRAISER II
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: cynaman; buffyt; Hemingway's Ghost
Marijuana is a psychoactive drug. If it weren't, nobody would bother taking it. It is a dangerous drug that has landed people in the hospital.

And of course it is a gateway. Just think about it, even on the purely psychological level. Not to mention the fact that friends who smoke pot are more likely to have stronger drugs that they will, in social situations, pressure people to take, or even, as happened to me, put stronger drugs in a supposed reefer.

Buffyt, the fact that you wrote "Pot is pot" disqualifies you from participation in any future discussion of the subject. The greenest novice knows that there are widely varying strengths, and the reasons why.

The Internet will tell you anything you have itching ears to know, by the way. As conservatives, we should all know that.

49 posted on 01/02/2003 6:40:06 AM PST by firebrand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Kevin Curry; OWK; jla
"...all the pro-dope ersatz conservatives posting here will cheer the dawning of a new age of nanny state socialism."

How so, my pro-WOSD FRiend? Anybody who wants pot now can get it whenever they want it...do you really believe the nonsense that marijuana usage will go up dramatically when marijuana is legalized?! And even if it does--which I don't believe, BTW--do you really believe the nonsense that potheads will all become wards of the State?!

Seriously, dude, yer arguments ring shallow to anyone who ain't drinking the BigGuv'mentKoolAid...MUD

50 posted on 01/02/2003 6:41:23 AM PST by Mudboy Slim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Sparta
Congressman Dan Burton Slams Drug War, Hints at Legalization of Street Drugs
51 posted on 01/02/2003 6:42:46 AM PST by TLBSHOW
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kevin Curry
And all the pro-dope ersatz conservatives posting here will cheer the dawning of a new age of nanny state socialism.

As opposed to those who cheer the current age of nanny-state socialism?

Kevin, you and your buddies are the socialists here. Too bad you can't just admit it.

I'd have a smidgen of respect for you if you at least admitted your control-freak tendencies, instead of posing as a conservative.

BTW, Happy New Year.

52 posted on 01/02/2003 6:43:31 AM PST by ActionNewsBill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Kevin Curry
Dopers and socialism go together like screws and nuts.

When did you start smoking dope?

53 posted on 01/02/2003 6:44:57 AM PST by OWK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Kevin Curry
"George Soros's blind and groping little liberdopian nanny socialist wasps"

Don't take you Lib'ral BigGuv'ment types long to go straight to the name-calling, does it, my FRiend?! Then again, like all Lib'rals, I can see that you don't want a civil consversation on this issue to proceed 'cuz it will expose the ridiculousness of this abysmal failure we've dubbed the WarOnSomeDrugs.

Or are you willing to debate this issue using the facts and logic?!

MUD

54 posted on 01/02/2003 6:45:15 AM PST by Mudboy Slim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: TBall
That's not the real problem with this statistic. Incidents reported as being related to marijuana have absolutely nothing to do with marijuana use. People are routinely asked in emergency rooms if they use marijuana. The government has taken an interest in forcing health care workers to ask these stupid questions. Note that no attempt is ever made to determine if the patient is currently under the influence of the drug. Any health care worker will tell you this, and in fact, several who post here already have . . . repeatedly . . . to no avail.
55 posted on 01/02/2003 6:46:20 AM PST by jayef
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: firebrand
What stronger drugs were in your "reefer" ESTROGEN?
56 posted on 01/02/2003 6:47:04 AM PST by rastus macgill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Kevin Curry
You flatter yourself. The truth is one weapon that you do not posess in your arsenal.
57 posted on 01/02/2003 6:47:50 AM PST by jayef
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: rastus macgill
That doesn't really merit an answer, does it? But no, it was angel dust, for the record.
58 posted on 01/02/2003 6:49:33 AM PST by firebrand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: firebrand
Not to mention the fact that friends who smoke pot are more likely to have stronger drugs that they will, in social situations, pressure people to take, or even, as happened to me, put stronger drugs in a supposed reefer.

Looks like a good argument for growing your own

59 posted on 01/02/2003 6:49:43 AM PST by ActionNewsBill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: firebrand
Again, correlation NOT causation. I have asked this question over and over. Someone please tell me the exact substance/agent/chemical in marijuana that induces craving for other "harder" drugs!
60 posted on 01/02/2003 6:50:02 AM PST by jayef
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 281-297 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson