Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: LibertarianInExile
See I did not generalize because I said MOST not ALL. If I said all that would be generalizing. And no I am not adding to the Republicans are sexist-racist-homphobes bandwagon since I did not say Republicans are bigots but paleocons are. Sam Francis, Peter Brimelow, Thomas Fleming, Chilton Williamson, Jared Taylor etc etc etc. Have you read any of their articles? The make Trent Lott's comment seem like the I have a Dream Speech. I am a conservative because of my belief in traditional values and classical economics, not because I think that our white European Christian civilization is threatened by the colored masses of the third world. I am against affirmative action, illegal immigration, and the left wing version of multiculturalism. I also happen to be for a reduction in legal immigration levels. But I do not racialize the issue and I happen to believe that immigrants can assimilate, all of them no matter where they come from. I know I did it rather well. And you know what? I am not the one who labels myself a neoconservative, at least not originally. I thought that I was just a plain conservative until these paleocons labeled ME and everyone conservative that thinks as I do a neocon. Paleoconservatives are mostly intolerant, of other viewpoints and of people who are different from them.
127 posted on 12/31/2002 2:18:46 PM PST by Classicaliberalconservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies ]


To: Classicaliberalconservative
You do some nasty labelling. But the bottom line seems to be that you are intolerant of people who want to preserve more traditional values than you do. What really is your point? Because you are 80% as Conservative as some of those whom you assail, is that a reason to assail them, rather than the "Leftists" with whom you agree only 20% of the time?

This need to throw bones, as it were, to the propagandists of the Left, who have spent three generations trying to condition Academia to what is now "politically correct," is tearing the Right apart in America. And when dysrons like Bill Kristol actually work with the New York Times--no moderate news media, it--the pattern becomes even clearer.

Let me, then, attack head on, what you seem to be saying. You would limit immigration and restraints on economic freedom, motivated by Leftwing social engineering, but you want to make it perfectly clear, that you do not like Conservatives who want to preserve their ancestral faiths, blood-lines--the ties of kith and kin--and the celebration of a common history and shared struggle. But why--other than the staccato cries of "xenophobia," "racism," "nativism," and "bigotry," which the Left uses because they have no valid argument--would you feel that way?

Since Biblical times, the greatest motivation for positive social behavior in the West, has been to pass on your values, heritage, material and spiritual achievements, etc., to your descendants. Nationality has always been about those things. It is ludicrous how many otherwise intelligent Conservatives and moderates, feel a compulsion to distance themselves from normal human motivations. It is also fatal to our cause.

If you are concerned about acts of cruelty directed against other peoples, I have no problem with that concern. I share it. But let's not put people down, who simply want to preserve the cultural and biological heritage that they were born into. That is not a rational basis to put anyone down!

William Flax Return Of The Gods Web Site

129 posted on 12/31/2002 2:43:00 PM PST by Ohioan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 127 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson