Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Powell to Stephie: Your Boss, Not Mine, Let North Korea Have Nukes
newsmax ^ | Dec. 29, 2002 | Carl Limbacher

Posted on 12/29/2002 7:55:34 AM PST by TLBSHOW

Powell to Stephie: Your Boss, Not Mine, Let North Korea Have Nukes

Appearing on ABC's "This Week" Sunday morning, Secretary of State Colin Powell challenged host George Stephanopoulos over the former Clinton aide's contentions that his old boss had managed to keep the North Korean nuclear crisis in check while the Bush administration had bungled the situation.

The exchange went like this:

STEPHANOPOULOS: In fact, the Clinton administration said that if the spent (nuclear) fuel was reprocessed that would be a red line that couldn't be crossed.

POWELL: It was crossed. During the Clinton administration the North Koreans had nuclear weapons. That was our intelligence estimate then, it's our intelligence estimate now. And in fact, the Clinton administration did have a declaratatory policy that if anything else happened at (North Korea's nuclear facility at) Yongbyon they would attack it. (End of Excerpt)

Moment earlier, Stephanopoulos cited complaints that Bush's hard line towards North Korea had contributed to the crisis.

STEPHANOPOULOS: I want to show something that Sen. John Kerry said the other day about the administration's policy. What he said (was), "What happened in North Korea is predictable and totally anticipated based on this administration's complete avoidance of a responsible approach to North Korea in over a year and a half. It is the absence of diplomacy, it is the absence of common sense that has brought this on." How do you respond to Sen. Kerry?

POWELL: Well, John Kerry is running for office. And I disagree with the senator as much as I respect him. The fact of the matter is that this (nuclear) program was not started during the Bush administration. It was started during the previous administration. Back in 1998 and 1999, the intelligence shows clearly that North Korea had embarked on a program of enriching uranium. And so, we inherited this problem. (End of Excerpt)

In fact, a November 1999 congressional report warned that the "Agreed Framework" negotiated with North Korea by the Clinton administration had given Pyongyang the capacity to produce 100 nuclear bombs per year.

The study was undertaken by the House North Korea Advisory Group, chaired by Rep. Benjamin A. Gilman, R-N.Y. Members of the panel included Rep. Doug Bereuter, R-Neb., then chairman of the Subcommittee on Asia and the Pacific, Rep. Porter J. Goss, R-Fla., chairman of Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence, and Christopher Cox, R-Calif., then chairman of the Republican Policy Committee.

With more than a year left in President Clinton's term, the Advisory Group cautioned that the deal that was supposed to derail Pyongyang's nuclear weapons program had instead backfired.

"Through the provision of two light water reactors [LWRs] under the 1994 Agreed Framework, the United States, through KEDO, will provide North Korea with the capacity to produce annually enough fissile material for nearly 100 nuclear bombs, should the Democratic People's Republic of Korea [DPRK] decide to violate the Nonproliferation Treaty [NPT]," the Advisory Group warned.

The report explained:

"If the 1994 Agreed Framework is implemented and two LWRs are eventually built and operated in North Korea, the reactors could produce close to 500 kilograms of plutonium in spent reactor fuel each year; enough for nearly 100 bombs annually if North Korea decides to break its obligations and reprocess the material."

Officials in Pyonyang acknowledged in October that North Korea had indeed broken its obligations under the Clinton accord and are now rapidly proceeding with a full-blown nuclear weapons program.

The Advisory Group further cautioned:

"Although the 1994 Agreed Framework was essentially aimed at eliminating North Korea's ability to make nuclear weapons, there is significant evidence that nuclear weapons development is continuing, including its efforts to acquire uranium enrichment technologies and its nuclear-related high explosive tests."

In one of the Advisory Group's most chilling observations, the report warned that since the implementation of the Clinton accord, North Korea had made significant progress in developing an intercontinental ballistic missile fleet capable of targeting the U.S. with weapons of mass destruction:

"In the last five years, North Korea's missile capabilities have improved dramatically. North Korea has produced, deployed and exported missiles to Iran and Pakistan, launched a three-stage missile [Taepo Dong 1], and continues to develop a larger and more powerful missile [Taepo Dong 2].

"Unlike five years ago, North Korea can now strike the United States with a missile that could deliver high explosive, chemical, biological, or possibly nuclear weapons. Currently, the United States is unable to defend against this threat."

The report also featured a bar graph that shows a direct correlation between increases in Clinton administration aid and North Korea's enhanced ICBM capacity.

The Advisory group also contended that the "Agreed Framework" had made North Korea "the largest recipient of U.S. foreign aid in the Asia-Pacific region."

"In an astonishing reversal of nine previous U.S. administrations, the Clinton-Gore administration, in 1994, committed not only to provide foreign aid for North Korea, but to earmark that aid primarily for the construction of nuclear reactors worth up to $6 billion," the House report noted.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: clinton; northkorea; nukes; powell
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-44 next last
To: bvw
You hit the nail on the head. Clinton was always about style, never about substance. It seemed most of the time that he was playing the role of president on a bad television show.

As for Stephanopoulus: It is so obvious that he is still a shill for the Democrats, the network should be embarrassed to put him forth as a supposedly objective host.

I watched just one program after he took over the top job. He interviewed Condoleeza Rice and kept interrupting her every 10 or 15 seconds. She was the lone Republican she interviewed that day. Then he had three Democrats on, and let them ramble on extensively without interruptions. One guy, I forget his name, actually made a self-serving speech for a minute and a half while Stephanopoulus smiled approvingly and didn't open his mouth.

This travesty of what used to be a good political show is disgusting. But then, it is probably produced by someone who is part of the Hollywood/New York liberal establishment that thinks the New York Times is a centrist newspaper.
21 posted on 12/29/2002 9:19:30 AM PST by Scribe35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: TLBSHOW
"In an astonishing reversal of nine previous U.S. administrations, the Clinton-Gore administration, in 1994, committed not only to provide foreign aid for North Korea, but to earmark that aid primarily for the construction of nuclear reactors worth up to $6 billion," the House report noted.

Like George Will said, "Bill Clinton...one of the worst humans to be President..." or something along those lines.Much more will be revealed in the coming years.

22 posted on 12/29/2002 9:21:15 AM PST by Pagey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: johnny7
Come on Johnny tell us what you really think of Bill Clinton.
23 posted on 12/29/2002 9:29:00 AM PST by Rik0Shay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Pagey
I bet the Clintons got a tidy little kick back for being so helpful to N.Korea.
24 posted on 12/29/2002 9:49:35 AM PST by dalebert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Pagey; Alamo-Girl
Much more will be revealed in the coming years.


THANKS TO OUR OWN ALAMO-GIRL

DOWNSIDE LEGACY AT TWO DEGREES OF PRESIDENT CLINTON
INTRODUCTION AND TABLE OF CONTENTS
Revised 1/9/02



http://www.alamo-girl.com/
25 posted on 12/29/2002 9:53:24 AM PST by TLBSHOW
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Pagey
Like George Will said, "Bill Clinton...one of the worst humans to be President..." or something along those lines.Much more will be revealed in the coming years.

You have to love George Will. How the man can tolerate "Kiddy Hour with Georgie and Friends on ABC" is amazing.

I think Will's quote will resonate throughout history:

"Bill Clinton may not have been our nation's worst President, but there is ample evidence that he most likely is the worst person ever to be President."

Will then wrote about Clinton's rape charge by Juannita Broaddrick, and Clinton's numerous allegations of sexual assault.

When Will's article was published, some newspapers removed the paragraphs where Will talked about the rapes and sexual assaults by Clinton.

But the media is all "right-wing" now controlled by Rush Limbaugh and FOX News, don't cha know.

26 posted on 12/29/2002 10:06:16 AM PST by SkyPilot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Jhoffa_
Exactly.
27 posted on 12/29/2002 11:11:08 AM PST by DoughtyOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: CometBaby
He did good today! Real good slamming the rat Clinton!
28 posted on 12/29/2002 11:14:08 AM PST by TLBSHOW
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: TLBSHOW
Wow! I guess Powell does have bxxxs after all!


MARK A SITY
http://www.logic101.net/
29 posted on 12/29/2002 11:15:41 AM PST by logic101.net
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TLBSHOW
From what you posted, I wish I had had the opportunity to "choose" to see the most recent episode of the "George Steffie-awfulness" sit-com. (Most Sundays I get to use my constitutional right to "choose" whether or not to watch him.)

Thanks for letting us know what Powell said. It sounds like he was pretty firm.

I'll bet some liberals wish they hadn't listenened to George S's show today. Now they might have indigestion right through to 2003.

30 posted on 12/29/2002 11:52:40 AM PST by syriacus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: syriacus

White House weighing N. Korean missile deal, Clinton trip, December 8, 2000 (CNN)

31 posted on 12/29/2002 11:58:29 AM PST by syriacus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: syriacus
September 18, 1999
Clinton relaxes U.S. sanctions against North Korea

October 17, 2000
Annan welcomes progress between US and DPR of Korea

October 23, 2000

http://www.cbsnews.com/images/2000/10/23/image243281l.jpg

32 posted on 12/29/2002 12:22:49 PM PST by syriacus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: TLBSHOW
This thread is not about abortion.
33 posted on 12/29/2002 12:25:06 PM PST by Republic of Texas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: TLBSHOW
the Clinton administration did have a declaratatory policy that if anything else happened at (North Korea's nuclear facility at) Yongbyon they would attack it.

That would have been in '94 or '93. It was public knowledge.

34 posted on 12/29/2002 12:28:53 PM PST by RightWhale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jimtorr
The nuclear club spread far and wide during the Clinton-Gore-Clinton administration

Bump

35 posted on 12/29/2002 12:30:51 PM PST by alrea
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: syriacus
Great research!
36 posted on 12/29/2002 12:39:14 PM PST by ErnBatavia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Lonesome in Massachussets
I lifted the line from the WSJ...
Cheers !
37 posted on 12/29/2002 4:19:27 PM PST by Eric in the Ozarks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: jimtorr
I believe that the spread of NBC weapons across the globe is part of a plan to re-create the balance of terror in the world. The U.S.A. must be contained at any cost, and not be allowed to spread it's version of Democracy.

Liberals have always sought to reduce the lead the U.S. had over less capable nuclear equipped adversaries.

Remember the "mutually assured destruction" mantra the liberals pontificated in the 70s, I believe? This treatise proclaimed that the world was a much safer place when the U.S. was faced by a equal but opposite array of nuclear weapons. Somehow the liberals believed that our enemies slept easier if they had megaweapons aimed at the U.S. but would never use them.

So it is not suprising that the Clintonistas let the WMDs proliferate with a wink and a handshake. Besides the CinC had more pleasant activities to attend to.

38 posted on 12/29/2002 4:37:59 PM PST by The_Media_never_lie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: The_Media_never_lie
So it is not suprising that the Clintonistas let the WMDs proliferate with a wink and a handshake. Besides the CinC had more pleasant activities to attend to.

But remember during the Clinton administration, no nuclear missiles are any longer aimed at the children of the United States.

He did it for the children! LOL!

39 posted on 12/29/2002 4:42:11 PM PST by The_Media_never_lie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: TLBSHOW
Thank you so much for linking to the Downside Legacy! Here's a special page for information on Clinton's handling of North Korea
40 posted on 12/29/2002 10:38:30 PM PST by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-44 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson