Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Farmers Threaten To Block US-Mexico Border Crossings [NAFTA]
Voice of America News ^ | Dec. 28, 2002 | AP, AFP and Reuters

Posted on 12/28/2002 7:10:41 AM PST by madfly

Angry Mexican farmers are threatening to block U.S.-Mexico border crossings on New Year's Day to protest the lifting of tariffs on agricultural products under free trade rules.

The farmers say they fear they will not be able to compete with U.S. and Canadian producers when tariffs are removed on January 1 as part of the North American Free Trade Agreement.

The farmers and their supporters are calling on the Mexican government to do more to protect the agricultural sector.

President Vicente Fox refuses to re-negotiate the free trade agreement, but he has pledged to help the farmers compete with the United States and Canada.

Some information for this report provided by AP, AFP and Reuters.



TOPICS: Breaking News; Business/Economy; Foreign Affairs; Government; Mexico; US: Arizona; US: California; US: New Mexico; US: Texas
KEYWORDS: borders; fox; freetrade; nafta; tariffs
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 201-214 next last
To: FreeSpeechZone
What does an indirect subsidy of U.S. exporters have to do with the topic of this thread? I thought the U.S. doesn't export anything anymore. /sarc
61 posted on 12/28/2002 11:18:58 AM PST by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy
I am merely pointing out that, if NAFTA is creating higher-paying jobs in Mexico...

Who said higher paying jobs were being created in Mexico? They're not, that's the problem and why you can't do trade deals with third world countries. It becomes lopsided in favor big-business who will simply move to the country that will provide cheaper labor.

American businesses aren't moving to Canada are they, and they're part of NAFTA too. Why would they, the wages up there are comparable to ours, it wouldn't be worth the move.

62 posted on 12/28/2002 11:20:06 AM PST by Reaganwuzthebest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: FITZ
I can't speak for the used clothing market, but since NAFTA was enacted, U.S. manufacturing exports to Mexico have increased. In other words, while some jobs may have been "sucked" southward, others were created here.
63 posted on 12/28/2002 11:26:56 AM PST by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: Reaganwuzthebest
Who said higher paying jobs were being created in Mexico?

Every single person who posts that we're losing our high-paying jobs to Mexico. Don't even start down that road.

64 posted on 12/28/2002 11:29:12 AM PST by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: Reaganwuzthebest; 4Freedom
The problem you two keep running into is that you think that by countering me, your argument will prevail. But you see, I bring no opinions. I don't write the Dept of Labor unemployment stats; or DOJ stats; or demographic stats. I'm not a analyst at CATO. I don't write for the LA Times. I just post this stuff. Meanwhile, you two post only your opinions.

The whole world continues towards a market economy and there are truisms about a market economy that can't/won't be denied.

Will the US/Mex border tighten? Undoubetedly. will illegal immigration stop? No. Hell, there needs to be somebody there to clean the table next time you go out to eat.

65 posted on 12/28/2002 11:30:06 AM PST by Ben Ficklin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy
Every single person who posts that we're losing our high-paying jobs to Mexico. Don't even start down that road.

What are you talking about? High paying, liveable textile and electronic jobs in the US are moving to Mexico where they can pay the workers barely anything. That's why illegals continue to pour in in the US. This is undeniable fact of life since NAFTA was enacted.

66 posted on 12/28/2002 11:34:29 AM PST by Reaganwuzthebest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: Ben Ficklin
No. Hell, there needs to be somebody there to clean the table next time you go out to eat.

This is such a ludicrous argument but you keep making it anyway.

Where I live there are few illegal aliens, mostly legal immigrants. And restaurant tables are getting cleaned Ben, same with the toilets, the hotels, and the lettuce and tomatoes are getting picked. You simply don't want to recognize supply and demand. If there's too many restaurants and hotels that can't be properly staffed, they close or pay better wages, and market forces work themselves out. That's why in my area and Canada that have few illegals the work gets done.

But I suppose you'll keep saying it over and over we need millions of illegals till like in 1984 the lie becomes the truth.

67 posted on 12/28/2002 11:43:05 AM PST by Reaganwuzthebest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: Reaganwuzthebest
European Union countries or Anerica Union countries ?
68 posted on 12/28/2002 11:46:09 AM PST by FreeSpeechZone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: Reaganwuzthebest
800,000 Jobless Americans to Lose Aid
69 posted on 12/28/2002 11:47:52 AM PST by FreeSpeechZone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: Reaganwuzthebest
Don't lose sight of my point. In order to claim that high-paying jobs are being lost to Mexico, one must acknowledge that higher-paying jobs are being created in Mexico.

No one can argue with a straight face that a Mexican working a Ford assembly-line south of our border is making the same amount of money that he would polishing hubcaps in Mexico City. In other words, a higher-paying job (in respect to the local wage-rate) has been created.

My point is that one cannot argue that we are losing these high-paying jobs to Mexico because of NAFTA, and simultaneously claim that illegal immigration to the U.S. is increasing because NAFTA is reducing Mexican wages, or otherwise adversely affecting Mexican employment.

70 posted on 12/28/2002 11:52:47 AM PST by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: FreeSpeechZone
At least with the EU the countries participating have similar pay structures and rules governing employers/employees. NAFTA is far from a level playing field between the US and Mexico. Perot was right, there is a sucking sound and it's only just begun.
71 posted on 12/28/2002 11:53:46 AM PST by Reaganwuzthebest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy
Then try taking some new clothes down there to sell ---or any other product and see how far you get. It's not free trade.
72 posted on 12/28/2002 11:59:11 AM PST by FITZ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy
...simultaneously claim that illegal immigration to the U.S. is increasing because NAFTA is reducing Mexican wages, or otherwise adversely affecting Mexican employment.

NAFTA may not be reducing wages in Mexico, but it isn't increasing them very much either. Again, why would anyone want to stay in Mexico and earn $2.00 an hour when he can come to the US and make at least $5.50 or more with all kinds of free taxpayer subsidized benefits? In that sense, NAFTA has been a total failure and has done nothing to stop illegal immigration.

73 posted on 12/28/2002 11:59:30 AM PST by Reaganwuzthebest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy
one must acknowledge that higher-paying jobs are being created in Mexico.

What good are higher-paying jobs if the cost of living has become outrageous there?

74 posted on 12/28/2002 12:00:58 PM PST by FITZ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: Carry_Okie
I can't improve on your comment!
75 posted on 12/28/2002 12:01:19 PM PST by AuntB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Reaganwuzthebest
To earn $2 an hour in Mexico, you'd better at least have a college degree. It's more like $0.50. Minimum wage has now risen to just over $4 a day ---that's about $30 a week.
76 posted on 12/28/2002 12:02:42 PM PST by FITZ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: Reaganwuzthebest
In that sense, NAFTA has been a total failure and has done nothing to stop illegal immigration.

No. In that sense, you are admitting that NAFTA has nothing to do with illegal immigration.

77 posted on 12/28/2002 12:03:28 PM PST by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: FITZ
I mean $25 a week.
78 posted on 12/28/2002 12:03:34 PM PST by FITZ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: Ben Ficklin; Reaganwuzthebest; WRhine
There are Libertarians at CATO. Yes, I've seen you post the CATO Institute's Libertarian interpretations of statistics and independent poll results.

Like the Libertarians at CATO are any less pro-illegal immigration and open borders than La Raza!

The Dept. of Labor statistics don't count the chronically unemployed in this country. The Dept. of Labor conveniently assumes that people that won't work for what an illegal alien will work for don't want to work.

You also post INS statistics that were compiled under that other fool Libertarian, James Ziglar. How many times do you have to be directed to Marine Inspector's website before you realize (admit) the INS is lying, too?

When are you going to admit that Ronald Reagan wasn't an open borders, pro-illegal immigration, one-worlder?

You're the one with the problem, Ben.

You claim not to be a Libertarian, but you're very libertarian-minded by your own admission. So, give it a rest already. We all know exactly where you're coming from, Mr. CATO.

79 posted on 12/28/2002 12:04:50 PM PST by 4Freedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy
" así como la eliminación de aranceles en el marco del TLCAN en enero del 2003, la migración interna y hacia territorio estadunidense será de grandes magnitudes."

What does this tell you??
80 posted on 12/28/2002 12:07:32 PM PST by FITZ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 201-214 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson