Skip to comments.
Stop Alien Abductions! (with your thought-screen helmet)
Stopalienabductions.com ^
| JON LOCKE
Posted on 12/25/2002 12:51:04 PM PST by boris
STOP ALIEN ABDUCTIONS
THIS WEBSITE TELLS YOU HOW TO MAKE A THOUGHT SCREEN HELMET, THE MATERIALS AND TOOLS YOU NEED TO MAKE ONE, AND WHERE YOU CAN OBTAIN THE MATERIALS
The thought screen helmet blocks telepathic communication between aliens and humans. Aliens cannot immobilize people wearing thought screens nor can they control their minds or communicate with them.
Results of the thought screen helmet exceeded expectations. Since January 2000 aliens have not taken any abductees while they were wearing thought screen helmets using Velostat shielding. See Case Histories and Testimonials.
The thought screen helmet was invented by Michael Menkin in 1998 and named after the thought screens that were described by science fiction writer Edward Elmer Smith Ph.D. in the Gray Lensman novels.
Other shielding material was tried in previous models with less success. Do not substitute the Velostat shielding with other materials. The Velostat made by 3M works!
You can make a thought screen helmet for $35.
(Excerpt) Read more at stopabductions.com ...
TOPICS: Political Humor/Cartoons; Unclassified
KEYWORDS: alienabduction; brainwaves; helmet; holdmuhbeer; tinfoil
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-96 next last
To: Quix
This isn't funny enough to laugh about, especially in view of the large number of children taken, and the lasting psychological and other damage many suffer.
21
posted on
12/25/2002 3:27:15 PM PST
by
crystalk
To: boris
The
Benevolent
Alien-
Terrestial
Society wants to assure everyone this is just a coincidence:
'Velostat' anagram: 'Save Lott'.
B.A.T.S. is a non-partisan organization, and we take no positions on internal planetary politics.
22
posted on
12/25/2002 3:28:36 PM PST
by
mrsmith
To: boris
I know I have one of these things in my Y2K supplies somewhere. Maybe it is in that big box in the garage.... ;-)
23
posted on
12/25/2002 3:30:16 PM PST
by
cgbg
To: boris
I don't for a minute believe anybody is being abducted by aliens or by the US government posing as aliens for that matter. What I do believe is that there is a widespread form of paranoia manifesting itself with bizarre delusions about abduction. The really facinating thing about this delusion is the detail reported and the similarities in the detail.
For many years various researchers have been amassing the psychological records of people claiming abduction and they have very similar reports, respond the same way to trick questions and very frequently have some sort of childhood abuse in their backgroud.
There's more to this in the way of mental illness than just being deluded or seeking attention.
To: crystalk
There's truth in what you say.
However, Given even Corrie Ten Boom's nazi prison camp experiences. . .
I think we have to learn to laugh at ourselves AND laugh in the face of the enemy.
None of us are getting out of this alive unless we are raptured. God has a sense of humor.
Often humor is all that can help us to emotionally get through great suffering.
I don't know that we need to force it--though there is SOME research that even forcing--practicing laughter even when one isn't initially feeling it--THAT DOING SO EVEN THEN HELPS THE IMMUNE SYSTEM and the emotions. I'm all for that.
I also think that laughter can be a way of taking control away from the ET abductor's. Satan and such ET henchmen seem to control primarily through fear induced or fear enhanced mind control junk. Often laughter can slice through the fear and return at least a measure of control to the victims.
Certainly there are rampant traumas evidently on the part of millions of victims. Am not laughing AT them. But life is full of complex, bizarre, torturous, etc. experiences. Laughter is, can be, must be a coping resource.
Besides, if one is standing beside a moderately busy roadway at night, naked from an abduction in the middle of a shower or nude sleep session; Odd looking ET's are on both sides; cars are going by seemingly obliviouis--what else does one do but laugh?
25
posted on
12/25/2002 4:16:27 PM PST
by
Quix
To: muir_redwoods
ACTUALLY, the MENTAL ILLNESS explanation has been proven in virtually EVERY SOLID RESEARCH STUDY to just not hold water--and CERTAINLY NOT in terms of the skeptic's assumptions made etc.
SOME percentage of such victims understandably have higher scores in terms of Post Traumatic Stress Syndrome.
Some people think a small percentage of victims have slightly more significant suggestability but I don't believe that data has been clear cut by any means. And in some studies, it's non-existent.
In short, your assumptions about mental illness and ET abductions just do not hold water when faced with solid research studies.
In fact, at least one study, if my memory serves me right, had a slight but significant ABOVE AVERAGE mean score in terms of mental health when comparing the victims to the average society.
Your assumptions would be a nice out for those who'd like to feel safer and have a more conventional reality to contend with--especially in the dead of night. But if one is serious about dealing with reality as it is, one must lay such assumptions, fantasies, hopes aside. They don't wash.
26
posted on
12/25/2002 4:21:54 PM PST
by
Quix
To: muir_redwoods
Now certainly it has been occasionally documented that evidently government people and sometimes just a sequence of events can result in people feeling rather crazy and acting somewhat strange--GIVEN all the abduction traumas AND the disconfirmation of those closest to them as well as all the "experts."
But I dare you to under go any kind of similar long series of traumas AND suffer similar disconfirmation from ALL those close to you AND from all the experts you consult AND lose a lot of sleep AND THEN demonstrate 0% mental/emotional stress etc. beyond average.
27
posted on
12/25/2002 4:24:12 PM PST
by
Quix
To: muir_redwoods
THE SEEKING ATTENTION accusation also does NOT hold water.
I forget exact percentages but I think on the order of 98+% of the victims TRY VERY HARD TO AVOID ANYONE ELSE KNOWING AT ALL--EVEN CLOSEST FRIENDS AND RELATIVES.
That accusation does not hold up to the most cursory of fair-minded, solid analysis.
28
posted on
12/25/2002 4:25:52 PM PST
by
Quix
To: Moosefart
Lesson learned: cover your outhouse with tin foil!
29
posted on
12/25/2002 4:30:54 PM PST
by
gitmo
To: muir_redwoods
Actually, the understanding about the ATTENTION SEEKING fallacy is easy to figure out.
1) The victim goes through perhaps years of extremely traumatic experiences causing them to doubt many shades and aspects of normal reality.
2) They fear telling even those closest to them.
3) Somehow someone finds out--maybe due to a co-abductee running into them or maybe at a finally braved group. And then more people find out.
4) Along with virtually every non-victim finding out--the ridicule, whispered things behind their backs; the head shaking; the anonymous tin-foil hats in the mail; the crank phone calls of people asking obtuse accusatory questions and then laughing hideously before CLICK; the pressures from close relatives and friends to get medication; to commit themselves to a hospital etc;
5) Do you really think remotely normal--or much of ANYONE--would REALLY WANT MORE SUCH TREATMENT AND RESPONSES?
6) The few who dare to brave publicity and go on talk shoes etc. usually do so as a kind of catharsis and to help other victims face the facts and come more easily to terms with their traumas.
7) The fame and riches are too problematic and too relatively to very insignificant except for a very, very few--to be any kind of draw compared to the traumas of exposure.
30
posted on
12/25/2002 4:32:13 PM PST
by
Quix
To: RadioAstronomer; longshadow; PatrickHenry; Physicist; VadeRetro; general_re
Something fun to do with your Christmas evening!
31
posted on
12/25/2002 4:33:28 PM PST
by
Aracelis
To: boris
Aliens cannot immobilize people wearing thought screens nor can they control their minds or communicate with them. But what if the microchip is implanted in your butt? They'll still be able to find you!!
You might need more coverage.
To: Piltdown_Woman
To: uglybiker
They seem well able to control victims who are not implanted.
One has to become VERY ANGRY AND AGGRESSIVE EMOTIONALLY AND VERBALLY, IF NOT BEHAVIORALLY IN THE FIRST MICROSECONDS of an abduction or perceived impending abduction.
I don't know if I'd trust a tinfoil hat or the above fancy tinfoil hat, or not. Mercifully, I don't seem to have ever been abducted. And at 55 with a vasectomy, I doubt I will be.
34
posted on
12/25/2002 4:49:53 PM PST
by
Quix
To: pabianice
Ah yes, "Taken". In the words of the estimable Kane (
http://cmanandkane.com ) it was a "bloated underachievment".
To: boris; 185JHP; 38special; bert; BlackbirdSST; brat; crystalk; Davea; Doctor Stochastic; ...
Don't know how many are interested in this sort of doc.
But . . . if you've been abducted, or think you might be, I suppose it could be of interest. Anyway--your choice.
Best of New Year to you. It will likely be even more dramatic than the last two years.
36
posted on
12/25/2002 4:59:57 PM PST
by
Quix
To: aomagrat
;-)
37
posted on
12/25/2002 5:02:04 PM PST
by
dighton
To: Quix
Or just grab the steering wheel and force them down like happened here:
To: martin_fierro
Yes but they'll wait outside and leave messages in the pea patch.
To: Quix
Thanks
40
posted on
12/25/2002 5:05:44 PM PST
by
185JHP
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-96 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson