Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Black Crunch jams Universal cycle [Cosmology]
Nature Magazine ^ | 23 Decemeber 2002 | PHILIP BALL

Posted on 12/22/2002 6:07:08 PM PST by PatrickHenry

Space might end up dark, thick and boring.

The Universe is not as bouncy as some think, say two physicists. If a Big Crunch follows the Big Bang, it may get stuck that way for ever1.

A fluid of black holes would bung up space. There would be nothing to drive another Big Bang, and nowhere else to go. The Universe would be, you might say, stuffed.

In a bouncing universe, all the matter currently flying apart slows until it reverses and falls towards a Big Crunch. Some physicists think this could ignite another Big Bang, in an unending sequence of expansion and contraction.

An idea called M-theory suggests how the switch from crunch to bang could happen2. The details depend on the shape of space: whether it is infinite and flat, or finite and curved like the surface of a balloon or a doughnut.

Thomas Banks of Rutgers University, New Jersey, and Willy Fischler of the University of Texas at Austin have considered a flat, infinite space in which particles get ever closer and ever denser.

In a space with such features, the smallest kinks in density are amplified into black holes, the densest objects in the Universe. So the whole of space-time would congeal into a very lumpy soup - a black crunch.

"We don't really know what this fluid is made out of," Fischler admits. But he and Banks argue that it may reach a pressure at which it cannot become any denser. At this point, the speed of sound equals the speed of light. Deadlock results.

No theory can cope with a Big Crunch. Because of this, says Fischler, the analysis that he and Banks have performed remains speculative. And a doughnut-shaped Universe could meet a quite different fate, he adds.

References:

1. Banks, T. & Fishler, W. Black Crunch. Preprint http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/hep-th/0212113, (2002). |Article|
2. Khoury, J., Ovrut, B. A., Seiberg, N., Steinhardt, P. J. & Turok, N. From Big Crunch to Big Bang. Preprint http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/hep-th/0108187, (2002). |Article|
[See the original article for links in the footnotes]


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Miscellaneous; Philosophy
KEYWORDS: bigbang; bigcrunch; blackhole; cosmology; crevolist
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 281-285 next last
To: MHGinTN
An average carpenter could figure it.

I agree completely!

121 posted on 12/22/2002 11:19:05 PM PST by RadioAstronomer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies]

To: Doctor Stochastic; MacDorcha
your attempt shows how long you've been out of school.

Dollars to donuts, this kid doesn't even have a clue what the word stochastic means.

122 posted on 12/22/2002 11:29:14 PM PST by Aracelis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies]

To: MacDorcha
i know my abilities. other wise, i wouldnt be so damned bull headed. i am sorry, but your story doesnt move me.

Ok, kid...let me give this to you straight. You are dealing with professors and professional scientists, NOT the average Joe-flunky that you likely have successfully bullsh*tted for years with your great "intelligence". Got it? Good.

One more thing: you are an evil-mannered, arrogant snot. Grow up.

123 posted on 12/22/2002 11:42:07 PM PST by Aracelis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies]

To: Physicist
"A problem like, "there's a 10-foot ladder propped at a 60-degree angle against a house; how high does it reach?" is quite beyond most freshmen"

you mean side-angle-side? thats a 30-60-90 triangle, so lets see... 5 feet away from bulding... 10 cubed root... 8.6 something or other feet.... up
124 posted on 12/22/2002 11:43:41 PM PST by MacDorcha
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

Comment #125 Removed by Moderator

To: Piltdown_Woman
as for my intellect, MENSA says im in the top .5% of the world's iqs. but far be it for me to question authorities on such matters. so, you can either "MENSA may be wrong" so i may say "professionals who haven't been there may be wrong" or, you can say "MENSA is right," and in which case, i still have arguing room. dont trifle with me. im by no means an average person.
126 posted on 12/22/2002 11:51:53 PM PST by MacDorcha
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies]

To: MacDorcha
dont trifle with me. im by no means an average person

Thank you for proving my point.

127 posted on 12/22/2002 11:53:52 PM PST by Aracelis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies]

To: Piltdown_Woman
stochastic

ill give you the short. it means it involves randomness. next?
128 posted on 12/22/2002 11:55:16 PM PST by MacDorcha
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies]

To: Piltdown_Woman
i never said i didnt need to grow up, i said you need to be put in your place. you still dont HAVE a point
129 posted on 12/22/2002 11:56:05 PM PST by MacDorcha
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 127 | View Replies]

To: MacDorcha
i said you need to be put in your place

Yawn! Those of us in Mensa at the top 0.1% are bored with you.

130 posted on 12/22/2002 11:58:29 PM PST by Aracelis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 129 | View Replies]

To: MacDorcha
i never said i didnt need to grow up, i said you

Try using (I) instead of (i) when referring to yourself in a sentence.

131 posted on 12/22/2002 11:59:21 PM PST by RadioAstronomer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 129 | View Replies]

To: RadioAstronomer
excellent statement. yes, you can find them both that way. i must admit however, that i slept much of the parabola chapters, and didnt care for them in 9th grade. you may refresh me if you like. it only helps to know. (no, im not being asinine to you, please teach me, i forgot.)
132 posted on 12/22/2002 11:59:38 PM PST by MacDorcha
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies]

To: RadioAstronomer
funny, you understood my statement... i dont change my postings here. you know what i meant, and thats the point of language.
133 posted on 12/23/2002 12:01:30 AM PST by MacDorcha
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies]

To: Piltdown_Woman
then go to bed.
134 posted on 12/23/2002 12:02:01 AM PST by MacDorcha
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 130 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry
I've read -- this is 2nd hand only -- that back in the 1930s, someone named Tolman showed that entropy increase was inevitable for a continuously oscillating universe. The reason I'm dubious is that I don't know where the "lost" energy/information would go. It's all got to be preserved in a crunch for yet another performance of the cosmic show. Or so it seems to me.

Energy doesn't get lost or go anywhere outside our universe. It simply gets redistributed very evenly, so that work becomes impossible.

135 posted on 12/23/2002 12:03:05 AM PST by Moonman62
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: MacDorcha
excellent statement. yes, you can find them both that way. i must admit however, that i slept much of the parabola chapters, and didnt care for them in 9th grade. you may refresh me if you like. it only helps to know. (no, im not being asinine to you, please teach me, i forgot.)

Ummm.... This is not the time or place to teach elementary math. I suggest you buy a good book on math and also one on grammar.

136 posted on 12/23/2002 12:03:55 AM PST by RadioAstronomer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 132 | View Replies]

To: Moonman62
"Energy doesn't get lost or go anywhere outside our universe. It simply gets redistributed very evenly, so that work becomes impossible. "

in such a case, is it safe to say that the universe would simply cease at some point? no expand, contract, up or down. no vibration at all? how would we know when we reached that state? as eternity would pass without our knwing... could we be jumpstarted by another event shedding energy into our existance? and we would start again, without having known we stopped? could this have happened already? hmm.... im not going to get sleep tonight.....
137 posted on 12/23/2002 12:07:00 AM PST by MacDorcha
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 135 | View Replies]

To: MacDorcha
funny, you understood my statement... i dont change my postings here. you know what i meant, and thats the point of language.

The problem is (like it or not), you are judged by you posts (grammar included). All that is available here is the ability to communicate using the written word.

138 posted on 12/23/2002 12:07:08 AM PST by RadioAstronomer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 133 | View Replies]

Comment #139 Removed by Moderator

To: MacDorcha
ok, i was being nice.... now you can shove it.

Why? Is it because I am not in the mood to try and teach you what you slept through? (your words, not mine)

140 posted on 12/23/2002 12:09:45 AM PST by RadioAstronomer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 139 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 281-285 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson