Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: LiteKeeper
One problem - this posting has to do with Christmas, and I don't see that one listed among the "Biblical Holy Days in the New Testament."

The point being that Christmas is the primary season (not even a day) that has replaced God's Holy days.

As wonderful a time as Christmas, and truly a time for worship, to contend that Christmas comes from ancient tradition is erroneous. For a time, the celebration of Christmas was even outlawed by the various churches, particularly because there was no Biblical basis for it.

I'm sorry but the facts on the orgin of Christmas are clear. You can go to any source and read about it as the article made clear. The history of the early church and how they merged nascent Christianity with paganism is also clear. You are correct in that various church groups have recognized the truth throughout history...groups of Puritans probably being the most prominent.

NOTE: I celebrate Christmas with the best of them. But, my faith and practice do not rest on it.

That is wise. My most illuminating moment was when I realized that the most God hating, secular, athiests celebrated Christmas in almost the exact same fashion as most Christians do.

95 posted on 12/21/2002 10:04:00 PM PST by DouglasKC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies ]


To: DouglasKC
The point being that Christmas is the primary season (not even a day) that has replaced God's Holy days.

Since I am a rigid advocate for sola scriptura, where is your scriptural justification for this statement?

103 posted on 12/21/2002 10:41:18 PM PST by LiteKeeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson